RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to order our questions specifically designed for maximum retention of the Patrol Guide--plus full-length exams!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Official Lieutenant Prediction Thread
How big will the Lt’s List be? [113 vote(s)]

Less than 1000
16.8%
1000-1500
35.4%
1500-2000
31.0%
2000+
16.8%


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 50
Date:
RE: Official Lieutenant Prediction Thread


saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:

if its 1250 names maybe ill make it


 your score is too low youll die on the list


 if im on the list they have to promote me


 no they dont



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 50
Date:

saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:

if its 1250 names maybe ill make it


 your score is too low youll die on the list


 if im on the list they have to promote me


 no they dont


 yes they do



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 50
Date:

saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:

if its 1250 names maybe ill make it


 your score is too low youll die on the list


 if im on the list they have to promote me


 no they dont


 yes they do


no they dont 



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 50
Date:

saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:

if its 1250 names maybe ill make it


 your score is too low youll die on the list


 if im on the list they have to promote me


 no they dont


 yes they do


no they dont 


 ENOUGH ALREADY



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 284
Date:

Why ?



-- Edited by nycop80 on Sunday 18th of June 2023 08:31:33 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 500
Date:

Can you imagine what Mikes forum would look like. 12 year olds make all the decisions

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 962
Date:

SATCOM wrote:

Is there a Facebook group or something other than this EDP forum to share and receive information? I have had a few things come up in the past few weeks that might have been helpful but I hesitated because of this nonsense. The worst part is these EDPs are definitely on the job or retired.  They know the jargon and process.

 

 Oh and where the hell are the moderators?  How can you take the Rising Star products and services seriously if these are the undertones.  



-- Edited by SATCOM on Sunday 18th of June 2023 02:35:51 PM


 Can you please share the info or private message the info. Would greatly appreciate it thanks.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 237
Date:

saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:
saharadesert23 wrote:

if its 1250 names maybe ill make it


 your score is too low youll die on the list


 if im on the list they have to promote me


 You clearly have no maturity and no clue.



__________________

You are what your record says you are.

-Me



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 39
Date:

What score is to low

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 267
Date:

61 is the cutoff with scale, not counting throwouts.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 500
Date:

A trophy for participation has finally made its way down to this job.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 288
Date:

This is nothing. Back in the day there was no such thing as failing / passing. You took the test, they made a list and If they got to you they got to you. People were getting in the 50s and getting promoted. Ray Kelly put a stop to it and made the 70 passing score

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 325
Date:

NauseousPBBN wrote:

61 is the cutoff with scale, not counting throwouts.


 Is that chart being followed for this exam?



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 267
Date:

The .231 scale was used on the 2017 Sgt Exam, and the last Sgt and Capt exam. Safe to assume the same will be applied to this exam, but as always, anything is possible.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 68
Date:

Agreed, with the .231 curve, a 61 with you get you on the list, thats not including if you pickup any throwouts or double answers. 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 453
Date:

Any word on TVB

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 237
Date:

3testwonder wrote:
NauseousPBBN wrote:

61 is the cutoff with scale, not counting throwouts.


 Is that chart being followed for this exam?


 One would think but as always...nobody knows



__________________

You are what your record says you are.

-Me



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 140
Date:

1800 people on the list as of right now

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 523
Date:

WETBRAINEDGINGER wrote:

1800 people on the list as of right now


 1800 without the curve? Or with? 1800 sounds way to high



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 196
Date:

No way in hell 1800 passed initially so if 1800 is true Im gonna say thats with the curve 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 267
Date:

They haven't started tvb yet or just started. For 1800 to be true, that means everyone passed once you factor in throwouts...lol

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 39
Date:

How many took the test

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 325
Date:

2500

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 39
Date:

1800 is a crazy number if thats the case people In the 50s are safe 1200 is more realistic lets see what happens just have to wait it out good luck all

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 68
Date:

Hopefully the TVB starts soon, 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 190
Date:

People thought the idea of 4,400 on the Sgt list was insane, and yet it was true. 1800 wouldn't shock me.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 453
Date:

NauseousPBBN wrote:

They haven't started tvb yet or just started. For 1800 to be true, that means everyone passed once you factor in throwouts...lol


 how sure are you?



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 267
Date:

83.5678% sure...

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 453
Date:

NauseousPBBN wrote:

83.5678% sure...


 I see 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 103
Date:

I dont think the job needs as many LTs as you all think. Compared to last year theres only a few comands that are short LTs. Those same commands are terribly short on sergeants and cops but not LTs...going to be a slow crawling list no matter how many people are on it

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 179
Date:

Theres currently 537 Lieutenants who can retire TODAY with a full 20+ year pension.

There are 1,015 Lieutenants who have between 15 to 19 years of service.

Total active Lts currently is 1,701.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 29
Date:

Plus the 400 thats gonna get promoted to Captain

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 124
Date:

Bklynsouth3020 wrote:

This is nothing. Back in the day there was no such thing as failing / passing. You took the test, they made a list and If they got to you they got to you. People were getting in the 50s and getting promoted. Ray Kelly put a stop to it and made the 70 passing score


 This is correct and in full swing.  This administration's intentions are to make lists and promote on an as-needed basis.  Realistically candidates in the lower tier will not get promoted unless there is a black swan event like covid and the riots where attrition became an issue.  The method they are adopting will account for these potentially catastrophic personnel issues without depending on new exams.   This all basically means, try and score above a 70 before curves and throw-outs and you will have a high chance for promotion.  The lower you are on the list the higher your chances of getting killed on the list.   Take all of this for what it is...All verified information.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 237
Date:

HeartsNminds wrote:

Theres currently 537 Lieutenants who can retire TODAY with a full 20+ year pension.

There are 1,015 Lieutenants who have between 15 to 19 years of service.

Total active Lts currently is 1,701.


 Keep dreaming sgts. Most of those morherfuckers are staying past 20. 



__________________

You are what your record says you are.

-Me



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 402
Date:

Take 50% of over 20, & 50% approaching 20 will leave. Thats about 750 + 400 captains of whole list gets made puts the LT list at 1100-1200. Sounds about right.

__________________

Youre all Keyboard Warriors



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 103
Date:

Bill Parcells wrote:
HeartsNminds wrote:

Theres currently 537 Lieutenants who can retire TODAY with a full 20+ year pension.

There are 1,015 Lieutenants who have between 15 to 19 years of service.

Total active Lts currently is 1,701.


 Keep dreaming sgts. Most of those morherfuckers are staying past 20. 


 They dont get it, these guys think that just because you can retire means you will. If they wanted to retire...they would have already



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 359
Date:

Cool theories guys. Do any of these ideas work with the Captain or Sergeants lists? No? Ok.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 523
Date:

Does anyone have the actual number of original passers to the Test so far without Curve/Throwouts like through a foil request? Ive heard as low as 350 to around 550.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 962
Date:

Satcom has some intel but doesnt want to release it because of the few idiots posting nonsense.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 385
Date:

Wen is this list gunna come out

__________________
Ak


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 962
Date:

Anyone have the official headcount of current vacancies and terminals for all ranks ?

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 523
Date:

RookieScum posted this a few days ago

Vacancies as of 6/16/23

Sergeant 533 (3568 out of 4101)

Lieutenant 66 (1378 out of 1444)

Captains -17 (367 out of 350 with 22 on Terminal)

DI 36 (144 out of 180 with 13 on Terminal

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 68
Date:

Just by Looking at the vacancy numbers for Lts, looks like Lts are retiring.  



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 75
Date:

Beta86 wrote:

Just by Looking at the vacancy numbers for Lts, looks like Lts are retiring.  


 Because theres 4.6% of the allotted rank open?



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 325
Date:

Veryy quiet here hmm

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 962
Date:

Taketheday wrote:

RookieScum posted this a few days ago

Vacancies as of 6/16/23

Sergeant 533 (3568 out of 4101)

Lieutenant 66 (1378 out of 1444)

Captains -17 (367 out of 350 with 22 on Terminal)

DI 36 (144 out of 180 with 13 on Terminal


 If you go on that 360 app on the desktop.. total vacancy numbers seem to be higher. Lts. 1710 give or take, as opposed to the 1444 listed here. Anyone know why there is a difference?



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 237
Date:

Because they promoted all those Lts on that ridiculous last list.

__________________

You are what your record says you are.

-Me



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 29
Date:

And this list will be even more ridiculous

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 359
Date:

2000+ easily

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 962
Date:

Bill Parcells wrote:

Because they promoted all those Lts on that ridiculous last list.


 With that being said then the dept can over promote from allotted vacancies ?



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 46  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us