RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to order our questions specifically designed for maximum retention of the Patrol Guide--plus full-length exams!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: You can now post test questions


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 398
Date:
You can now post test questions


I'll start..

The vehicle pursuit question...

The answer that jumped off the page at me initially was the one that said that the primary and the boss can call for additional unit(s) because they feel it is becoming too dangerous to apprehend the perp.

After further thought, I think I got it wrong. If it's too dangerous to apprehend the perp safely, shouldn't the pursuit be called off?

The radio codes in the question broadsided me. I had no clue. Was that the correct answer?

Does anyone know what # it was so we can reference it on the spreadsheet?



-- Edited by Wingnut on Thursday 24th of October 2013 12:53:29 AM

__________________



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date:

There were two cops doing Day tour  because they had collared.



-- Edited by Zmann on Thursday 24th of October 2013 02:37:37 AM

__________________


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:

There is no official date for the protest review session. The back of the green form says, in summay, that requests to attend the review session are to be postmarked no later than one week following the regular test date (i.e., must be sent postmarked by October 26, 2013). It continues to say that if you do not receive your appontment letter to the protest within 4 1/2 weeks from the date of the regular test then you must appear in person at the address given. Furthermore, it states that the appointment letters are mailed "about 10 days before the date of the PRS" (really professional wording of that important fact DCAS). This leads me to believe that the Protest Review Session will be held late November. Between 6-7 weeks following the date of the actual test. Plan on it probably being the week of Thanksgiving - just MY opinion.



-- Edited by Brooklyn1er on Thursday 24th of October 2013 07:10:49 AM



-- Edited by Brooklyn1er on Thursday 24th of October 2013 07:16:50 AM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1082
Date:

I spoke with 1 of the other moderators and we agree that posting test questions is no longer a big deal.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 398
Date:

Can you ban the user "kenny" now.

Leonard's a Section 8.

__________________



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1082
Date:

I only ban trolls..... Not border line EDPs.  



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date:

Wingnut wrote:

I'll start..

The vehicle pursuit question...

The answer that jumped off the page at me initially was the one that said that the primary and the boss can call for additional unit(s) because they feel it is becoming too dangerous to apprehend the perp.

After further thought, I think I got it wrong. If it's too dangerous to apprehend the perp safely, shouldn't the pursuit be called off?

The radio codes in the question broadsided me. I had no clue. Was that the correct answer?

Does anyone know what # it was so we can reference it on the spreadsheet?

Can't remember the pursuit one....the radio code was 99T7  Darp and other tow

-- Edited by Wingnut on Thursday 24th of October 2013 12:53:29 AM


 



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 38
Date:

That's the right answer. The radio codes were reversed.



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:

What was the answer for the vouchering of the gun and the silencer? I chose same voucher not a seperate.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 38
Date:

Same voucher. Gun,mag,chamber,other cart and silencer



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 45
Date:

ShaunNY wrote:

Same voucher. Gun,mag,chamber,other cart and silencer


 same voucher...



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 45
Date:

ok people what about the force figure question which is number 4 on the answer key...

from what i caught there were four things to look for

1. Dont count the ICO OR THE PLT CMDER (PLT CMDER started at 1100)
2. Dont count limited or restricted
3. Dont count the Detail people
4. Include the cop doing a court tour with a new arrest.

My total was 41... answer being A


__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 45
Date:

Zmann wrote:

There were two cops doing Day tour  because they had collared.



-- Edited by Zmann on Thursday 24th of October 2013 02:37:37 AM


 yea i remember that.. but if i remember correctly the second guy was not counted... for some reason cant remember why....



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date:

MJV231 wrote:
Zmann wrote:

There were two cops doing Day tour  because they had collared.



-- Edited by Zmann on Thursday 24th of October 2013 02:37:37 AM


 yea i remember that.. but if i remember correctly the second guy was not counted... for some reason cant remember why....


 Ohhh that I don't remember lol so I guess I got that 1 wrong. 

What was the answer for the 16 year old missing that had a fight with her mother and never came home.?



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 38
Date:

Seems like a lot of people had mixed emotions on that question. Think it was question #4 and if u look at the spreadsheet A,C and D are heavy favorites. Think it went in numerical also. I choose A= 41.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 29
Date:

What are the Traffic Agent getting assaulted towards the end questions. I picked that form that may or may not be completed by Patrol Supervisor.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 68
Date:

One of the questions has the TS taking a CCRB report and asks what part of the forms are to be filled out. I was looking for an answer of " none of the above " but it wasn't an option. I feel that question should be tossed since the TS can never take a ccrb complaint and must forward it to the Desk

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 29
Date:

Liberal Tools wrote:

One of the questions has the TS taking a CCRB report and asks what part of the forms are to be filled out. I was looking for an answer of " none of the above " but it wasn't an option. I feel that question should be tossed since the TS can never take a ccrb complaint and must forward it to the Desk


   Ahhhh good point I remember seeing that as well. That very well maybe a good one that gets the boot.



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date:

Liberal Tools wrote:

One of the questions has the TS taking a CCRB report and asks what part of the forms are to be filled out. I was looking for an answer of " none of the above " but it wasn't an option. I feel that question should be tossed since the TS can never take a ccrb complaint and must forward it to the Desk


 That's exactly what I was thinking. That question threw me completely off. I was like wtf.. TS operator never takes a ccrb. But I bet that will conveniently be one of the "research" questions lol



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:

Yaaaayyyyy. I got it right!!!



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:

What about the barricaded EDP. I was lost. More ESU for me

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:

Oh and the CIMS. For one I chose NYPD for the water control. The other I guessed. Anyone else gor tripped up. By the other CIMS question?

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:

Oh ok. I'll be right there ;) Thank you



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 73
Date:

I hated that stupid jury duty question. I looked into that procedure PG 211-21 and found out you notify the ICO if it was 7 days from the jury duty. Didn't realize we can keep the fee. I didn't do that when I had jury duty. The cims question was nypd for water/ice rescue and the other cims had something to do with life safety operations which I think was FDNY because they are also in charge of mass decontamination. Which question was the t/s one with ccrb so we can all protest that one. The barricaded edp 216-05 turns into a hostage barricaded and we then comply with PG 212-38 and the patrol supervisor ensures that HNT is coming thru communications because the umos is already supposed to notify taru, hnt, esu. Also in the procedure central automatically notifies patrol supervisor and esu. Also the vehicle pursuit was PG 212-39 and the primary and supervisor can ask for assistance if they cannot safely apprehend the suspects.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Date:

Zmann wrote:
Wingnut wrote:

I'll start..

The vehicle pursuit question...

The answer that jumped off the page at me initially was the one that said that the primary and the boss can call for additional unit(s) because they feel it is becoming too dangerous to apprehend the perp.

After further thought, I think I got it wrong. If it's too dangerous to apprehend the perp safely, shouldn't the pursuit be called off?

The radio codes in the question broadsided me. I had no clue. Was that the correct answer?

Does anyone know what # it was so we can reference it on the spreadsheet?

Can't remember the pursuit one....the radio code was 99T7  Darp and other tow

-- Edited by Wingnut on Thursday 24th of October 2013 12:53:29 AM


 wrong it said any supervisor...so this will be protested because a civilian supervisor cannot call additional units?


 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 398
Date:

JDawg?

The jury duty question(s) is a ground ball verbatim from 205-26.

I got it wrong, twice..

__________________



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:

well I guess I got that one wrong. Damndisbelief



-- Edited by dedicated on Thursday 24th of October 2013 07:12:59 PM

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 43
Date:



-- Edited by Romeo23g on Saturday 26th of October 2013 10:15:38 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 172
Date:

dang with the pursuit i had a feeling the codes were reversed and i picked it anyway 



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:

What about the CIMS questions. I chose the NYPD for the water question. I gueased the other one. Can anyone tell me how they figured the second CIMS question. I know I just chose B

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 398
Date:

NYPD for water rescue was definitely right. I don't remember what the other CIMS question was but I do recall thinking it was a ground ball also.

__________________



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:

Ok. Gooodddd :))))

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 73
Date:

Someone at work mentioned that to me but when I went back to check they were referring to the process server question where the DO doesn't accept it and sends the server to new pct. I know I got that one wrong. I'm just trying to gather as much info before the protest session as possible.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:

Me too. Jdawg. But noones posting questions.  I don't know why when I know I remember a lot but not all. If we all put up questions, we will eventually have the questions that we as a whole might want to protest. Lets do it yall



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date:

Jdawg wrote:

Someone at work mentioned that to me but when I went back to check they were referring to the process server question where the DO doesn't accept it and sends the server to new pct. I know I got that one wrong. I'm just trying to gather as much info before the protest session as possible.


 Crap the answer for this one was send him to the members new command.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 118
Date:

In my opinion the  armed EDP was isolated and contained  and never went into Hostage/Barricaded mode. I noticed he only spoke Russian so I went with 216-05 and asked for the help of a translator . But I think it could go both ways.



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:

oml!!!!!! You are right Damn



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 242
Date:

Caballo Loco wrote:

In my opinion the  armed EDP was isolated and contained  and never went into Hostage/Barricaded mode. I noticed he only spoke Russian so I went with 216-05 and asked for the help of a translator . But I think it could go both ways.


 i asked for the translator



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 44
Date:

what did you guys put for the question about when the monthly reports are due? I thought it was a ground ball, till someone at work mentioned to me that they gave us a date of October ,making it when the quarterly reports are due.. I put the 2nd for the cop, 5th for the Sgt to LT... I think the right answer might have been, sgt to lt on the 7th since it was the month the quarterly is due..

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 73
Date:

Yea but the armed EDP, one of the choices was P/S request HNT through communications which is the very first step in the procedure as you can see Romeo. Because EDP is very similar to hostage barricaded and that's one of the things that the umos requests but he P/S ensures. I think that is also a great protest question since both answers do seem right. Let's remember these questions guys and create a list for all of us to protest individually but still with strength in numbers. Jay i don't think they asked for the quarter but that could be a good question to review when you go.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 44
Date:

jdawg, that's what I said, until I read the procedure.. 205-57 (notes- under step 14) it basically says that they are due to the LT by the 5th, but in the months of Jan,April,July, and OCT, the quarterly review will be done. Im positive it didn't say "quarterly report" on the test, but its written in the PG as if in those month, it will automatically be the quarterly, and as a SGT in OCT, you will automatically do the quarterly report.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Date:

The answer to the second CIMS question was A , it included "life safety operation", that's the only thing you had to see to get the answer.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 73
Date:

Yes manhands I picked that choice as well. Jay, if it didn't ask for the quarter, then they were looking for the regular month which is the 2nd to the sgt and the 5th to the LPC/SOL. But check that question out for the review because I will certainly re analyze that one.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 44
Date:

I hope so, and I will also.

__________________


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Date:

Jay77 wrote:

jdawg, that's what I said, until I read the procedure.. 205-57 (notes- under step 14) it basically says that they are due to the LT by the 5th, but in the months of Jan,April,July, and OCT, the quarterly review will be done. Im positive it didn't say "quarterly report" on the test, but its written in the PG as if in those month, it will automatically be the quarterly, and as a SGT in OCT, you will automatically do the quarterly report.


 The question said according to 202-17 patrol supervisor and 202-21 police officer NOT 205-57



__________________


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Date:

Jdawg wrote:

I hated that stupid jury duty question. I looked into that procedure PG 211-21 and found out you notify the ICO if it was 7 days from the jury duty. Didn't realize we can keep the fee. I didn't do that when I had jury duty. The cims question was nypd for water/ice rescue and the other cims had something to do with life safety operations which I think was FDNY because they are also in charge of mass decontamination. Which question was the t/s one with ccrb so we can all protest that one. The barricaded edp 216-05 turns into a hostage barricaded and we then comply with PG 212-38 and the patrol supervisor ensures that HNT is coming thru communications because the umos is already supposed to notify taru, hnt, esu. Also in the procedure central automatically notifies patrol supervisor and esu. Also the vehicle pursuit was PG 212-39 and the primary and supervisor can ask for assistance if they cannot safely apprehend the suspects.


 211-21 has nothing to do with Jury Duty....205-26 is Jury Duty and I don't know where you get the 7 days thing from because it says NOTHING about 7 days and the ICO.....Also in the CCRB question YOU WERE the T/S operator and the correct answer was to pass the complaint to the Desk Officer



__________________


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Date:

Did anyone catch on the last question of the In-Basket with the charges on the 61? I put Assault 2 because the victim was 65 and the perp was 54. It makes it Assault 2 when the perp is 10 or more years younger than the victim who is 65 or older.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 30
Date:

If it is determined that questions have double answers, does the question get thrown out or are both answers correct?

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 30
Date:

90YAmIHere wrote:

Did anyone catch on the last question of the In-Basket with the charges on the 61? I put Assault 2 because the victim was 65 and the perp was 54. It makes it Assault 2 when the perp is 10 or more years younger than the victim who is 65 or older.


 I'm Having a brain fart, did each choice specify the degree or just state "most serious charge" 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 342
Date:

..........



-- Edited by soccerpsyco32 on Saturday 26th of October 2013 06:25:00 PM

__________________
1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us