RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to subscribe to our mailing list and get info on the next Sgt, Lt. or Captain Exam!

IShredMajors · Senior Member

April Class

Bklyn net · Senior Member

Just wondering can they put in a class even though the protest review session is march 31?

IShredMajors · Senior Member

The list has been established and released. The results are final. The protest review will give us a little bit of info but it won't change anything.

bigfoot45 · Guru

Yes they can. List is established. Nothing can change at the review

Bklyn net · Senior Member

Ok thank u

ltexm2015 · Veteran Member

Ishred....can you tell me where your getting 30 number from?

sixmonthwonder · Guru

That would be nice, wish it was a bit more, but something is better than nothing.

IShredMajors · Senior Member

ltexm2015 wrote:
Ishred....can you tell me where your getting 30 number from?

Not gonna reveal my source but the 30 number is definitely not set in stone, it's too early to know the exact number. I was just starting the thread to see if anyone else has more info than me.

-- Edited by IShredMajors on Wednesday 2nd of March 2016 06:43:33 PM

ltexm2015 · Veteran Member

Been hearing less....way too early to tell. Bmoc doesn't know yet and no word from personnel

hotshot25 · Veteran Member

They said last week at the PA that they needed 44

bigfoot45 · Guru

Who actually makes the decision when to put in a class and how many go in?

Su Madre 24 · Guru

sixmonthwonder wrote:
That would be nice, wish it was a bit more, but something is better than nothing.

I'm not surprised brother. Even tho theres apparently 50 something vacancies, they gotta slow play this list imo. As we all know...just not enough of you guys on the list.

i think they'll stretch this thing out for about 18 months

sixmonthwonder · Guru

Su Madre 24 wrote:
sixmonthwonder wrote:
That would be nice, wish it was a bit more, but something is better than nothing.
I'm not surprised brother. Even tho theres apparently 50 something vacancies, they gotta slow play this list imo. As we all know...just not enough of you guys on the list.
i think they'll stretch this thing out for about 18 months

That does sound feasible, but at the same time it would be strange to leave vacancies open just so they can drag the list out. The 2011 list ended in November and they didn't even establish the 2015 list until February. They need to announce a test right now in my opinion though, they should shoot for a November test.

Su Madre 24 · Guru

sixmonthwonder wrote:
Su Madre 24 wrote:
sixmonthwonder wrote:
That would be nice, wish it was a bit more, but something is better than nothing.
I'm not surprised brother. Even tho theres apparently 50 something vacancies, they gotta slow play this list imo. As we all know...just not enough of you guys on the list.
i think they'll stretch this thing out for about 18 months
That does sound feasible, but at the same time it would be strange to leave vacancies open just so they can drag the list out. The 2011 list ended in November and they didn't even establish the 2015 list until February. They need to announce a test right now in my opinion though, they should shoot for a November test.

From your lips to God's ears!! I WISH they announced it ASAP! But...still think we're on the 2015 timetable: Aug announcement for April test

sixmonthwonder · Guru

Think they'll almost certainly run out of names on this list then, especially if it takes DCAS a year to release it again. Hopefully it's a fair test this time around, we're due for one.

Cheaterpolice · Veteran Member

I wonder what's going to happen. Would be nice of the job did the right thing for once and passed over the makeup people

sixmonthwonder · Guru

If they wanted to do the right thing they would curve the test so everyone above 65 made the list. They don't care.

bigfoot45 · Guru

Does anyone know any details about a class this month?

johnnybigtime · Veteran Member

Class on the 29th. Numbers keep changing from around 20 down to 12. They want to stretch this list 18 months.

Su Madre 24 · Guru

johnnybigtime wrote:
Class on the 29th. Numbers keep changing from around 20 down to 12. They want to stretch this list 18 months.

Thanks for the info for BT. Have you heard any rumors about the next test? Everyone prob still expects an August announcement for April 2017.

johnnybigtime · Veteran Member

Sorry nothing about the next test.

bigfoot45 · Guru

johnnybigtime wrote:
Class on the 29th. Numbers keep changing from around 20 down to 12. They want to stretch this list 18 months.

Wow, that makes a lot of sense. We will run on a Lt deficit for 18 months instead of 3 to 6 months. Dopes

Devil Dog · Senior Member

Thx Johnny.

sixmonthwonder · Guru

bigfoot45 wrote:
johnnybigtime wrote:
Class on the 29th. Numbers keep changing from around 20 down to 12. They want to stretch this list 18 months.
Wow, that makes a lot of sense. We will run on a Lt deficit for 18 months instead of 3 to 6 months. Dopes

Yeah, if they want to make it last they could put in 50 now and wait three or four months before they put in a second class. Not surprised though, NYPD logic.

rockets · Veteran Member

Confirmed class of ~20 Lieutenants getting promoted on the 29th

Bklyn net · Senior Member

How does it work i know sgt classes u get promoted at the end They get called for ID cards and shields two days before ? I know they get promoted up front

ltexm2015 · Veteran Member

promotions 29th....id cards prob wed/thurs the week prior

Bklyn net · Senior Member

THanks

Nypd 1234 · Veteran Member

Only 20. Wtf.

Windeast · Senior Member

i say they announce another exam this april for november, hoping to expedite this list now and skip over the scammers being investigated so that way they can exhaust the list and start a new one with less scammers.

Devil Dog · Senior Member

Windeast wrote:
i say they announce another exam this april for november, hoping to expedite this list now and skip over the scammers being investigated so that way they can exhaust the list and start a new one with less scammers.

From your lips to God's ears...

TransitSucks · Senior Member

no one is going to admit they cheated.

sixmonthwonder · Guru

TransitSucks wrote:
no one is going to admit they cheated.

I've heard some already have. Hard to risk your job when there's evidence against you.

Most will be in the clear, but for some there is already a case that they cheated.

ltexm2015 · Veteran Member

Id expect to see I'd card notifications come down next monday

bigfoot45 · Guru

Any confirmation on the number of promotions this month?

Wheresthelist · Guru

26 on the 29th

DETSGT · Guru

Just heard the same. 26 Lt's no capt's

Wheresthelist · Guru

No sgts no capts

skiguy37 · Senior Member

Wow. We will find out real soon how serious the department is taking the cheating scandal.

Slate · Senior Member

Thanks whereathelist, any word on the makeups?

Nypd 1234 · Veteran Member

How many of these cheaters will be passed over?

wereinbacklog · Guru

Nypd 1234 wrote:
How many of these cheaters will be passed over?

24

skiguy37 · Senior Member

wereinbacklog wrote:
Nypd 1234 wrote:
How many of these cheaters will be passed over?
24

Are you serious?

EddieFrank · Member

Are we sure this for an investigation and not because people don't have the time or credits?

IShredMajors · Senior Member

wereinbacklog wrote:
Nypd 1234 wrote:
How many of these cheaters will be passed over?
24

wereinbacklog · Guru

skiguy37 wrote:
wereinbacklog wrote:
Nypd 1234 wrote:
How many of these cheaters will be passed over?
24
Are you serious?

That's what I was told.

Wheresthelist · Guru

Slate wrote:
Thanks whereathelist, any word on the makeups?

I dont have any info regarding this sorry.

Boogie Knight · Senior Member

skiguy37 wrote:
Wow. We will find out real soon how serious the department is taking the cheating scandal.

There was no cheating involved with this exam.

Scenario: Taker taker A takes exam on April 18 and test taker B takes exam months later.

if test taker A wants to tell test taker B everything that was on the exam, he can. at this point, it is an issue of competitiveness.

There is no code of silence or contract anyone signed that restricts people from talking or listening after a test is given. Even that piece of sh!t that was allegedly outside of the school asking people what was on the exam is not cheating. A piece of sh!t, yes, but not a cheater.

Taker A can keep quiet to keep his/her advantage. Hence, competition.

Cheating occurs if both test takers when taking it at the same time and pass notes, give signals, text each other, etc. as the test is being administered. OR if the hard copy itself is provided to the test takers in advance of the exam is administered, that's cheating too.

it is what it is. As much as I myself hate to admit it, the holy observers/military/etc. have only the classic case of, Don't Hate The Player, Hate The Game.

-- Edited by Boogie Knight on Tuesday 15th of March 2016 01:04:08 AM

soccerpsyco32 · Senior Member

^^^^ Yes. But said conduct may still be "prejudicial to the good order and discipline of the Department". There's a reason they have these type of "catch all" administrative charges, and this type of bullsh!t could absolutely be covered under that charge.

Slate · Senior Member

Boogie Knight wrote:
skiguy37 wrote:
Wow. We will find out real soon how serious the department is taking the cheating scandal.
There was no cheating involved with this exam.
Scenario: Taker taker A takes exam on April 18 and test taker B takes exam months later.
if test taker A wants to tell test taker B everything that was on the exam, he can. at this point, it is an issue of competitiveness.
There is no code of silence or contract anyone signed that restricts people from talking or listening after a test is given. Even that piece of sh!t that was allegedly outside of the school asking people what was on the exam is not cheating. A piece of sh!t, yes, but not a cheater.
Taker A can keep quiet to keep his/her advantage. Hence, competition.
Cheating occurs if both test takers when taking it at the same time and pass notes, give signals, text each other, etc. as the test is being administered. OR if the hard copy itself is provided to the test takers in advance of the exam is administered, that's cheating too.
it is what it is. As much as I myself hate to admit it, the holy observers/military/etc. have only the classic case of, Don't Hate The Player, Hate The Game.

-- Edited by Boogie Knight on Tuesday 15th of March 2016 01:04:08 AM

Interesting PERSONAL definition of cheating. Unfortunately you missed the part that says acting unfairly in order to gain advantage. Knowing the questions word for word before you take your makeup that were obtained after the protest session falls in that category. You dont need any codes of silence/contracts to act unfairly.....