RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to subscribe to our mailing list and get info on the next Sgt, Lt. or Captain Exam!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Do we still think 9 is the number of changes?


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date:
Do we still think 9 is the number of changes?


I never posted here before but I have been reading this forum since day one like a EDP. Just like everyone else this is torture for me. I am sitting on a 66 and want this to come to an end already. Does anyone know if the questions that were mentioned in prior posts are still possible??

1, 78, 86, 106 & 115 as throwouts

7, 10, 45 & 54 as double/triples

Again, I have zero intel.. this is just from prior posts. I was hoping some one may have any thing to possibly confirm or deny this.  Ondeair?



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 117
Date:

I don't think those numbers are accurate

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

I was told 106 was rejected as a throwout....I will see how accurate that is in a few weeks...but if true..then it will prob be low throwout numbers

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1550
Date:

Sgt2be didn't you also hear that 78 wasn't changed as well?

__________________

67 on 2015 Lt Exam. DISGRACE!

 

Lt Exam Wars

Episode II : Vucinaj Strikes Back

2017



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 271
Date:

I don't think 9 is the number nor will all of those numbers be changed. The longer it drags out The more hope I lose with the number of changes.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

Wat was that question again?

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 271
Date:

Cims was 78

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

I didn't hear anything...there was nothing wrong w the question...it was NOT a typo....

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 318
Date:

just wondering anyone know the reason 106 would be good ?

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 189
Date:

what was wrong with 7 and 115?

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

7 in my opinion will be a change if not throwout...

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 318
Date:

did 7 have to do with the in basket or pg knowledge?

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 189
Date:

Don't remember the question just a couple of people who protested it as a throwout. If not a throwout and it's a change what you think would be the double/triple ?

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

7 was a inbasket dealing w a post change

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 318
Date:

I heard it was good because the Ts guy was on meal not sure what to think

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date:

How is 106 not a throwout... The correct answer as per dcas was after the cutoff date clearly

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:

Don't think anything was wrong with the Cims question.

But 45 should definitely be a throw out.

Just my opinion. In the end dcas will do what dcas wants to do.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 213
Date:

How many changes in total? 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 652
Date:

Jabronijoe29 wrote:

How is 106 not a throwout... The correct answer as per dcas was after the cutoff date clearly


Agreed, I got 106 correct because I got lucky, but if 106 isn't a throwout then nothing was a throwout. That was hands down, 100% wrong according to the cutoff date.



__________________

Darth-Vader-and-Storm-Trooper-dance.gif



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

dcas said TOO BAD...they stated MOST CORRECT....and guess what...the answer was MOST CORRECT

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:

I don't think anything is written in stone with dcas. The ops orders and ccrg were not on the noe but they look like their sticking.
In the end what is our recourse if we feel wronged or cheated by dcas? Lawsuit, media attention, crying? Nothing will change what they decide to do.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1022
Date:

At this point it really could go anyway. No one knows. About 19 more days we ll have a definite answer.

__________________

I cannot tell a lie I did cut it with my hatchet

Pay no attention to my posts any longer. 

I can not help myself in creating lies.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

Amen! 19 changes submitted...I think 5 to 19 changes are in play..I expect to see 5

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:

Back to where we were half a year ago...
Btw, anyone who's familiar with this testing process, can Dcas summon the original test writers and have them explain protested questions?

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:

If that's the case, we are looking at minimum changes

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

Yes slate

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

Capt went down there



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:

0-5 at most, just my opinion

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date:

Ok thanks everyone..I guess the only thing we can do is continue waiting

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 475
Date:

sgt2be wrote:

Amen! 19 changes submitted...I think 5 to 19 changes are in play..I expect to see 5


 I agree with sgt2be, the majority coming out the inbasket and at least two on the rest of the test.



-- Edited by wisecop on Friday 8th of January 2016 11:30:08 PM

__________________

Disclaimer: 'Regular' Elite -***NOT*** a 'True' Elite.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 235
Date:

wisecop wrote:
sgt2be wrote:

Amen! 19 changes submitted...I think 5 to 19 changes are in play..I expect to see 5


 I agree with sgt2be, the majority coming out the inbasket and at least two on the rest of the test.



-- Edited by wisecop on Friday 8th of January 2016 11:30:08 PM


 Put it this way, if there are people with political connections that scored 60 or better and an entity is pushing a certain person or persons which happens all the time in civil service then we're looking at signifcant amount of changes. If none of that is going on, most are taking this test again in early 2017.

 

The Choas theory or butterly effect is what all of us are experiencing.  Small causes having large effects. Captain Pony tail has altered the lives of many sergeants who should have passed under fair conditions and now it boils down to pure luck for many.



-- Edited by Cathetel on Saturday 9th of January 2016 12:00:18 AM



-- Edited by Cathetel on Saturday 9th of January 2016 12:06:35 AM



-- Edited by Cathetel on Saturday 9th of January 2016 12:09:22 AM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1550
Date:

I agree with Cathetel in the statement of a test in early 2017. Since the new norm will be longer study times...I wouldn't be surprised they announced a new test by April or May of this year!!

__________________

67 on 2015 Lt Exam. DISGRACE!

 

Lt Exam Wars

Episode II : Vucinaj Strikes Back

2017



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1868
Date:

I think we will all be surprised with this list's outcome ,...the wait is almost over.

__________________

The end is near,..good luck to all!,...



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 101
Date:

Sgt2be what 5 would you think r high probabilities of being changed? I feel you may know a little more then the rest of us lol?

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

I dont..I have heard from 2 good sources that number 1 is throwout....I also heard 7 was being talked about as possible throwout....those are the only 2 I heard...106 I was told no throwout based on it was most correct

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 318
Date:

but was it ? I must be missing something on 106

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

Yes it was the most correct answer...even though it was not all correct

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 189
Date:

sgt2be wrote:

I dont..I have heard from 2 good sources that number 1 is throwout....I also heard 7 was being talked about as possible throwout....those are the only 2 I heard...106 I was told no throwout based on it was most correct


 Did you protest these 2 questions ? If so doubles or to ?



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

I did not protest these....I don't think 106 will be changed...I do think 1 will be throwout...those are the ones I'm pretty confident about. Again this process is so secret it's hard to ever be sure of anything

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 652
Date:

sgt2be wrote:

Yes it was the most correct answer...even though it was not all correct


 Why was it more correct than making contact with the isolated threat, or whatever the wording was? I sat there for 10 minutes trying to decide between them.



__________________

Darth-Vader-and-Storm-Trooper-dance.gif



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 969
Date:

6th month....I'd have to look at it again...I believe if I remember correct the other choices wrre all things the wrong actor was supposed to do...meaning if they wrre asking about patrol supervisor then those other choices dealt w first supervisor on scene

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 189
Date:

Dcas is playing hardball, even with this small list. A lot of us including myself were expecting a throw out bonanza. I'm shaking in my boots with a 69.. 67 and below your toast .

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1022
Date:

U may be right. But the puzzle of this is that it could go either way. Absolutely could. It's not even wishful thinking it's just the fact that dcas is a mystery in itself. We might see a really small list which yes means another exam coming up. I would guess late 2017 bc they ll have more newly promoted sgts meaning more exam takers. Or, we could have a repeat of 2011. The ones they threw out there weren't dead on convincing to s. U just never know---with this it's anyone's guess. It's very hush hush this guy has dropped log after log on this exam as well----that doesn't help the flow.

__________________

I cannot tell a lie I did cut it with my hatchet

Pay no attention to my posts any longer. 

I can not help myself in creating lies.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1022
Date:

I tend to agree with sgt2be at this point. But, we could be cometely wrong on all make this thing. I'm not holding my breath for myself at a 65 at this point.

__________________

I cannot tell a lie I did cut it with my hatchet

Pay no attention to my posts any longer. 

I can not help myself in creating lies.

DOA


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 216
Date:

Cathetel wrote:
The Choas theory or butterly effect is what all of us are experiencing.  Small causes having large effects. Captain Pony tail has altered the lives of many sergeants who should have passed under fair conditions and now it boils down to pure luck for many.

 I agree with your post but the butterfly effect is when an even infinitely small variations creates huge changes to a system.  This was not that. This was a fundamental variation.  This guy is not a butterfly. He is Mothra!!!  I've heard a lot of war stories about Capt V since this started.  It doesn't matter if the person was a subordinate, colleague or supervisor, they all say everything this guy touches is a complete **** show.  I'm more annoyed at the people on this job who put this idiot in a position to have such a profound, negative affect on so many careers.   He shouldnt be a duty capt or shoe fly for the same reason.  The extent of this guy's responsibilities shouldn't exceed polishing spent shell casings  in an isolated, unheated trailer at Rodman's Neck!



__________________

RESURGET FRATER TUUS



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 241
Date:

There is absolutely no way 106 is not a throw out.  Its not even the most correct.  If someone asked you a question on what the colors of the rainbow were and the options said red yellow green and black, when then you absolutely know its an incorrect answer.  There is no ifs ands or buts about this question, if its not a throwout then this test is more rigged than a democratic election....



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 251
Date:

ondeeair2321 wrote:

U may be right. But the puzzle of this is that it could go either way. Absolutely could. It's not even wishful thinking it's just the fact that dcas is a mystery in itself. We might see a really small list which yes means another exam coming up. I would guess late 2017 bc they ll have more newly promoted sgts meaning more exam takers. Or, we could have a repeat of 2011. The ones they threw out there weren't dead on convincing to s. U just never know---with this it's anyone's guess. It's very hush hush this guy has dropped log after log on this exam as well----that doesn't help the flow.


 Explain how the guy dropped log after log about the exam... he wrote this piece of garbage exam.. what logs is he dropping?



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1082
Date:

Bigguy69 wrote:

Dcas is playing hardball, even with this small list. A lot of us including myself were expecting a throw out bonanza. I'm shaking in my boots with a 69.. 67 and below your toast .


So if I read between the lines here, it sounds like 2 or 3 changes.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 241
Date:

bigfoot45 wrote:
Bigguy69 wrote:

Dcas is playing hardball, even with this small list. A lot of us including myself were expecting a throw out bonanza. I'm shaking in my boots with a 69.. 67 and below your toast .


So if I read between the lines here, it sounds like 2 or 3 changes.


 I say 19, i dont see them straying too far from what the tvb recommended....they never have in the past.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 312
Date:

Sarge wrote:
bigfoot45 wrote:
Bigguy69 wrote:

Dcas is playing hardball, even with this small list. A lot of us including myself were expecting a throw out bonanza. I'm shaking in my boots with a 69.. 67 and below your toast .


So if I read between the lines here, it sounds like 2 or 3 changes.


 I say 19, i dont see them straying too far from what the tvb recommended....they never have in the past.


 Did tvb even reccomend 19 changes?? Initial reports here were 12 were submitted.



__________________
1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us