Final Price Drop! Sergeant or Captain Cram! All our questions plus full-length exams for only $199! Also taking orders for the 2023 Lieutenant Exam Only $349 for "Just the Questions" or bundle with The Key's full course for $995 Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to order

Members Login
Post Info TOPIC: 2013 sgt list is out


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 74
Date:
2013 sgt list is out


930 names on list.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

932

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 74
Date:

I just hope this doesn't change anything with our list... I'm due up in next class.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 155
Date:

It wont. If anything, they will probably rush the rest of the 2011 list.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

The 2006 list say almost a year waiting for the dept to promote off the 2003.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 576
Date:

Jesus Christ calm down. Nothing is happening to this list. Stop shaking out. Scary that you are going to be a boss..

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

"Shotsfired" relax the kid got nervous. It's ok to react that way. Lol.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 576
Date:

Lol, yikes..

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1550
Date:

I'm shocked they released this list now. Figured in October

__________________

67 on 2015 Lt Exam. DISGRACE!

 

Lt Exam Wars

Episode II : Vucinaj Strikes Back

2017



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 45
Date:

I heard from a source our list is done next class is from 2013 list..............

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 711
Date:

Can't wait to see all the trolls come out and comment on how the 2011 list is done...

 

RRiz3.gif



__________________

THE GIF MASTER.

tumblr_inline_nn342vvxE61t3vdw2_500.gif

 

'TRUE ELITE!'

 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 45
Date:

Lmao..... good one.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1550
Date:

It's interesting to see how this thing plays out.

__________________

67 on 2015 Lt Exam. DISGRACE!

 

Lt Exam Wars

Episode II : Vucinaj Strikes Back

2017



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 45
Date:

2013 list is pretty big considering so many people didn't finish the test, if it wasn't for that curveball from dcas it would've probably been around same size as our list. I also noticed some people from our list on the new list.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 576
Date:

Who cares about the 2013 list. Is there gonna be a July class????

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 523
Date:

Semp1 wrote:

The 2006 list say almost a year waiting for the dept to promote off the 2003.


 This is simply not true. The 2006 was given in January of 2006, the list was established around October 2006 and classes began the same month killing the December 2003 list which still had about 600 names on it.

But the 2009 list came out and was held for about a year while the 2008 finished up. Keep in mind the 2008 list had less than 800 people total and the 2009 list had less than 900 people.

I am not saying I know what is going to happen, but the 2011 has a long way to go to finish, it probably would take well over a year to finish it. Could they hold the 2013 for over a year? Sure, they did it fairly recently for the 2009 list waiting about a year for the 2008 list to finish. But the 2006 exam started promotions the same month the list came out and killed a similar sized list as the 2011, so who knows?

Anyone hearing anything credible?



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

Ok whatever you say. I figured you would be back around now to Troll.  And I know about the 2009 list considering I'm the one who told you about it over a year ago.  





-- Edited by Semp1 on Thursday 19th of June 2014 09:08:44 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 576
Date:

Semp don't even respond to him. He's obviously a sick loser.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 523
Date:

Semp1 wrote:

Ok whatever you say. I figured you would be back around now to Troll.  And I know about the 2009 list considering I'm the one who told you about it over a year ago.  





-- Edited by Semp1 on Thursday 19th of June 2014 09:04:04 PM


 Trolling? What did I write that was false? Also I knew about the 2009 exam, just don't know exact dates simply bc I was did not take either the 2008 nor the 2009 exam. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

Ok man.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 213
Date:

What's your prediction. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1550
Date:

I know people still on the 2011 list. Hopefully it is exhausted before they start on the 2013 list.

__________________

67 on 2015 Lt Exam. DISGRACE!

 

Lt Exam Wars

Episode II : Vucinaj Strikes Back

2017



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 576
Date:

Why is this still a conversation? Everyone on the 2011 list will get made then the 2013 list will start.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

Shotsfired wrote:

Why is this still a conversation? Everyone on the 2011 list will get made then the 2013 list will start.


 It's not really a convo.   There's a few trolls that come in.   Make a lot of statements.  Newer people don't know their trolls believe them and people feel they need to correct them so stupid rumors aren't spread.   But I'm actually done feeding into it.  Im just aiding it.  



-- Edited by Semp1 on Thursday 19th of June 2014 09:23:11 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 576
Date:

Semp the ones that have been on this site know they are trolls and know you are one of the few guys on here that knows what they are talking about and has common sense.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1550
Date:

I'm not a troll I'm legitimately wondering how this plays out. I really can't comprehend why DCAS couldn't release this new list in October. If they do exhaust the 2011 list (god willing) the people from the 2013 list will be waiting quite awhile.



__________________

67 on 2015 Lt Exam. DISGRACE!

 

Lt Exam Wars

Episode II : Vucinaj Strikes Back

2017



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

Su madre wasn't referring to you.  But in regards to your statement.  The 2011 list will be done in less than a year.  Probably around 11 months based on average.    2013 list really won't be waiting long.   Both lists combined are less than 1450 whichequals  around 2.8 years of promotion.  Normal wait in my opinion.  



-- Edited by Semp1 on Thursday 19th of June 2014 09:44:18 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 523
Date:

Just to point out, everything I posted on this board is 100% true while the guy calling me a troll actually posted bad info on this very page, perhaps not intentionally but nonetheless incorrect. I have speculated on a cut list but always wrote that I have no inside info confirming this one way or the other. Just looking at what happened to the December 2003 exam where 1100+ got promoted but 500-600 people including myself died on the list.

The 2011 exam does in fact have a similar sized list as the 2003 exam. 2003 is a really long time ago now and the 70 passing mandate did not exist then, but I came on here just to give the advice if you chose to take it that if you were near the bottom on the 2011 exam it is worth your while to prepare and take the 2013 exam just in case there is a list cut. Now if you passed both exams, you would not feel any anxiety right now and you would be that much better prepared for a possible run at the next Lieutenant's exam whenever that is...

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

You died on that list because you failed it horribly. To even use that as an example is ridiculous when I'm preTy sure you got a lower score than 65% based on promoted scores off 2003.  Not one failed test is on lists any more. 2003 is not a good example at all. The only good example is 2009. And you're a Trolll based on when you post and the kind of posts you post not what they are. You intentionally come on when you're supposedly a supv just to stir the pot. That's what a Troll does.







-- Edited by Semp1 on Thursday 19th of June 2014 09:57:21 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 523
Date:

So is anything I wrote false? Nope. Also I didn't fail it horribly, it was a very difficult exam and I died by just a few names. I mean its apples to oranges, but I would bet money the 2003 exam was far more difficult than the 2011 exam just based on the scores. I didn't take the 2011 exam, but the consensus is that it was the exam to take, not easy, none are, but just much more straightforward and fair exam.

If you talk to anyone that took the last 3 captains exams, the last lt exam, the last sgt exam, DCAS lately has been throwing some stinkers out there lately.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

You still got a failing score by any standard and that's why they cut lists. It's ridiculous guys even complain about getting cut with below 65's. You didn't pass. You didn't deserve the promotion.  Say what you want about 2011 but the fact is every one on that list did better than you did on 2003 And actually passed by any standard. 



-- Edited by Semp1 on Thursday 19th of June 2014 10:03:58 PM



-- Edited by Semp1 on Thursday 19th of June 2014 10:04:53 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 168
Date:

Hate to be a bearer of bad news, but I am hearing from sources that this list will be cut soon.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 403
Date:

PatrolGuideismyBible wrote:

So is anything I wrote false? Nope. Also I didn't fail it horribly, it was a very difficult exam and I died by just a few names. I mean its apples to oranges, but I would bet money the 2003 exam was far more difficult than the 2011 exam just based on the scores. I didn't take the 2011 exam, but the consensus is that it was the exam to take, not easy, none are, but just much more straightforward and fair exam.

If you talk to anyone that took the last 3 captains exams, the last lt exam, the last sgt exam, DCAS lately has been throwing some stinkers out there lately.


 Dude just stop your non sense.What do you care if it gets cut or if it's made ? 



-- Edited by queensfinest on Friday 20th of June 2014 03:45:40 AM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 523
Date:

Semp1 wrote:

You still got a failing score by any standard and that's why they cut lists. It's ridiculous guys even complain about getting cut with below 65's. You didn't pass. You didn't deserve the promotion.  Say what you want about 2011 but the fact is every one on that list did better than you did on 2003 And actually passed by any standard. 



-- Edited by Semp1 on Thursday 19th of June 2014 10:03:58 PM



-- Edited by Semp1 on Thursday 19th of June 2014 10:04:53 PM


 Maybe you are right, I didn't deserve the promotion at that time, but I probably had a better list # than you on a different exam. In other words I probably ranked better than you compared to how many people were on the list or took the test and had a better percentile. It didn't matter, I didn't get promoted bc I wasn't good enough for that list. But guess what? Your superior score on the 2011 exam to my bad score on the 2003 exam might or might not matter, that remains to be seen.

Point is I think you would lying if you said that you are not at all concerned the 2013 list came out already with so many left on the current list. Maybe everyone does get made off the 2011 list, maybe it goes on for another year or more, but you cannot tell me honestly you are not at all worried at the moment.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

I don't care what your "list" number was. You failed. That's like saying if they had list number 933 on this new list he's better than my list with a failure Of a 69.  lol. Your argument is silly and very Trollish. I'm done responding to you. 



-- Edited by Semp1 on Friday 20th of June 2014 01:27:12 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Date:

The 2003 test did not have the passing grade 70 in effect. The 2006 test was the first test you needed a certain grade to pass. Since they implemented the 70 as a passing grade NOBODY has ever died on a sgt list

-- Edited by 2Hashmarks on Saturday 21st of June 2014 11:28:12 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

2Hashmarks wrote:

The 2003 test did not have the passing grade 70 in effect. The 2006 test was the first test you needed a certain grade to pass. Since they implemented the 70 as a passing grade NOBEY has ever died on a sgt list


 I'm aware but a 65 is a 65 in any scholastic environment.  



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 88
Date:

What's the difference between a Sgt with a 70 and a Sgt with a 100?






None. Their both Sgt.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 224
Date:

I really don't think this list is going to get cut short if you passed you deserve to get promoted. I'm thinking by march everyone here should be a boss. Then comes 2013 list at mid 400! Super excited to be on a list I'm at 6 years by 8 years I hopefully will be promoted not to bad :)

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 213
Date:

The list it's not certified by Dcas yet the 2011 list still good. 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 398
Date:

I'm definitely not a troll. Before the 2013 list came out I was thinking (with no ITK info) that there was about 0.5% chance of the 2011 list being cut. That was based mostly on the going idea that the 2013 list was going to be very, very small.

Now that the 2013 list is out, it's pretty big compared to what most people were thinking. That alone has raised the chance of the 2011 list being cut, in my own thinking, to about 4 or 5%. Still very unlikely, but I'd be squirming a bit if I were low on the 2011 list.

Again, just my thoughts, not attempting to stir the pot in any way.

__________________



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 840
Date:

Brat put a forum topic in the 2013 section saying the list is good by her professional opinion. Honestly that's the only opinion I need. And Wingnut why are you even on this board, not that you can't post here but aren't you on the 2013 list. Did you make that list because I know you said you didn't make the 2011 test.





-- Edited by Semp1 on Friday 20th of June 2014 09:01:32 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 727
Date:

Iwearpumas wrote:

It wont. If anything, they will probably rush the rest of the 2011 list.


 One has nothing to do with the other.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 403
Date:

Semp1 wrote:

Brat put a forum topic in the 2013 section saying the list is good by her professional opinion. Honestly that's the only opinion I need. And Wingnut why are you even on this board, not that you can't post here but aren't you on the 2013 list. Did you make that list because I know you said you didn't make the 2011 test.





-- Edited by Semp1 on Friday 20th of June 2014 09:01:32 PM


 Yup



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 163
Date:

TV1234 wrote:

What's the difference between a Sgt with a 70 and a Sgt with a 100?






None. Their both Sgt.


The only difference is the seniority time and vacation picks. That's it.

But I agree, no difference! 



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Date:

I'm one of the lucky ones,.


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 576
Date:

Lol

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 224
Date:

1000 cops back on the street let's see if they increase the class sizes and only skip a month or two, hopefully none.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date:

Also maybe now that 2013 list is larger then expected they might maximize the amount they put in from now on



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 33
Date:

Sorry for whoever is on the end of the 2011 list but I have good word it will be cut.  Remember I'm the one who told you all the scores were being released when they were.  



__________________
1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us