RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to subscribe to our mailing list and get info on the next Sgt, Lt. or Captain Exam!

bigfoot45 · Guru

How many people will pass!!!!

hollar · Guru

Disagree... One didn't have to study hard for six months for this test

PatrolGuideismyBible · Guru

Yes, even the patrol guide questions were very tricky and inconsistent in many of the fact patterns. Someone who knew the PG cold could still get a lot of them wrong bc the fact patterns and the choices were vague...

RISING IDIOT · Senior Member

hollar wrote:
Disagree... One didn't have to study hard for six months for this test

I am starting to think the same thing.....P.S. I am one of the idiots that dedicated 6 months of his life to studying

occbsux · Veteran Member

100-250 depending on the throwouts.

NYG37 · Senior Member

I think there will be easy 500-600 people passing the scores won't be as high though. I'm just hoping for a bare minimum of 70%.

OkeeDokee · Veteran Member

Most P.G. questions were of the "trick variety." Studying helped, albeit not much. The PAR question was a set-up.

E D · Senior Member

What was up with Uniform question, I tbought 2 people were ok?
Also the Truck & bus supplemental, I didn't even see the right answer as a choice and I know that procedure well

-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:08:15 PM

infinity · Senior Member

I thought the tattoo guy and hair clip girl were good to go. What was the wrong voucher? Money or phone?

E D · Senior Member

They asked 4 good voucher didn't they? I put marijuana was good one Y i thought they were both good too.

-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:13:24 PM

infinity · Senior Member

Truck and bus I put 1 par and don't use the marker.

infinity · Senior Member

I put the phone. The marijuana threw me off with the FTP? I thought that meant field test positive. But it should be POS

E D · Senior Member

It's supp to be 2 truck & bus supplaments and no marker, but that wasnt a choice, WTF!

-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:15:44 PM

wereinbacklog · Guru

They asked which voucher was good for signing off

counterfeit voucher= bad counterfeit usc doesn't vouchered

firearm voucher= bad round from chamber was itemized 2nd

cellphone vouchered = bad it was vouchered as safekeeping should be arrest evidence

marihuana= good

wereinbacklog · Guru

The 204 question the answer was the tatoo guy that came out in 2010, he doesn't have to carry the letter on his person

occbsux · Veteran Member

Marijuana was missing the complaint number.

MN50 · Senior Member

Wasn't it the gun voucher that was wrong

E D · Senior Member

So what was wrong with the girl with the small brown hair clip

wereinbacklog · Guru

It didn't ask which one was wrong it asked which one was good for signing.

MN50 · Senior Member

None of the vouchers had a 61#

infinity · Senior Member

It didn't meet the criteria for the supplement. Nobody was transported for medical or any cars towed

MN50 · Senior Member

I thought the brown clip girl was good

wereinbacklog · Guru

I didn't see what was wrong with the girl with the hair clip but the most correct to me was the the umos with the approval of the co and wasn't carrying the letter.

sig226 · Senior Member

For par question it's one supplement. and no reference markers for bridges/tunnels

E D · Senior Member

Yes the truck was towed for other than flat tire v

MN50 · Senior Member

Negative, the truck was towed for a defect

infinity · Senior Member

They called a tow. Didn't say it was towed

E D · Senior Member

Can't bebone supp, comm vehicle over 10000 lbs, and other vehicle had hazmat placard

wereinbacklog · Guru

The Traffic Agent question about harrasment the answer was (49 addressed to Chief of Patrol) it should be chief of transportation.

sig226 · Senior Member

In uniform must have a letter.

wereinbacklog · Guru

The accident question stated that a tow truck was called but not that the vehicle was removed from the scene, therefore no supplement

E D · Senior Member

Uniform, double answer, par throw out. That's my opinion

sig226 · Senior Member

Exactly. That vehicle was over 10000 something plus the driver had injury and his suv had hazmat plaque

wereinbacklog · Guru

sig226 wrote:
In uniform must have a letter.

U do not need a letter if the reason is for a tatoo and approved by d co. The PG states it goes in ur personal folder and doesn't have to be carried.

E D · Senior Member

Backlog are u serious? Can't be. If a tie truck was called the car was towed

wereinbacklog · Guru

sig226 wrote:
Exactly. That vehicle was over 10000 something plus the driver had injury and his suv had hazmat plaque

the driver had injury but not removed from the scene

infinity · Senior Member

He was treated at the scene. Even tho they requested a tow, no car was removed. No doa. No supplement! And I'm sticking too it lol

OkeeDokee · Veteran Member

sig226 wrote:
In uniform must have a letter.

Where does it say that anywhere?It should be in personnel folder.

Also, the truck & bus question---the car had a biohard plaque.

How about the ammended PAR question? It says in the P.G. to refer them with leaving the scene cases, but it also says give them a MV104 if they don't qualify for MV104an

-- Edited by OkeeDokee on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:25:52 PM

-- Edited by OkeeDokee on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:27:28 PM

E D · Senior Member

Right, tattoo app by Co don't carry letter, goes in ur folder.
But the girls hair was ok too. That's why I say it's a double.

sig226 · Senior Member

Operation safe store dropped it big time((gotta call detective bureau duty captain. not co/duty capt
What about that retarded one with exploded dye pack...they wanted 2 procedures and none was indicated in answer choices

wereinbacklog · Guru

E D wrote:
Backlog are u serious? Can't be. If a tie truck was called the car was towed

The question came down to two choices (Eliminate 2 since the reference marker will not be used accident occured on a bridge). Both stated one par, and not include d reference marker, but one said no supplement and the other stated one supplement. If in fact the supplement should be done then it should be two (placard, 22k lbs) instead of one.

-- Edited by wereinbacklog on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:26:07 PM

MN50 · Senior Member

It's supposed to be a commercial truck over ten k, the truck in question was a rental, the guy was treated at the scene, for it to qualify injury had to be fatal or he had to be immediately transported to hospital, the suv with the placard was the only vehicle that qualified. And I think when they requested the tow for the defect it inferred the truck was towed

E D · Senior Member

Right there in 203-07, the note

sig226 · Senior Member

Ok but truck weighted more than 10000. Doesn't it get supplement report?

sig226 · Senior Member

QUALIFYING VEHICLE - for the purposes of this procedure is:
a. Any commercial truck having a Gross Weight Rating or Gross Combined Weight Rating more than 10,000 pounds
b. Any vehicle displaying a hazardous materials placard

E D · Senior Member

If there is one cond of severity, the truck being towed, you Do a supp for every Qual vehicle. There were 2. The truck and suv with hazmat placard. U don't use ref marker for bridges and tunns.
It should of been 2 supps no marker, but that wasn't a
Choice.

NYG37 · Senior Member

IInfinity is right.it sucks I got it wrong

OkeeDokee · Veteran Member

1. Didn't it say commercial rental? And,
2. Wasn't it a biohazard plaque?

wereinbacklog · Guru

E D wrote:
If there is one cond of severity, the truck being towed, you Do a supp for every Qual vehicle. There were 2. The truck and suv with hazmat placard. U don't use ref marker for bridges and tunns.
It should of been 2 supps no marker, but that wasn't a
Choice.

Bingo, that's why I choice no supplement because since they didn't give me the correct supplement amount I figured that d vehicle wasn't towed and the person was treated at d scene. Either way a double answer or throwout.

MN50 · Senior Member

It stated it was a rental truck, not a commercial so it didn't qualify. The suv was the only vehicle that qualified, only one supp prepared