RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to order our questions specifically designed for maximum retention of the Patrol Guide--plus full-length exams!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: NY POST ARTICLE II


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 310
Date:
NY POST ARTICLE II


NYPD cops used cheat sheet to pass promotion test: lawsuit

 
Modal Trigger

 

An online cheat sheet to an NYPD promotion test gave applicants who failed an unfair advantage when it came to passing the make-up test, nine lieutenants allege in a new lawsuit.

The officers filed suit Thursday against the city in Manhattan federal court, a month after The Post exclusively reported that a cheating scandal was running rampant within the department  one where make-up test-takers passed at rates eight times higher than those who took the original exam.

In the lawsuit, the lieutenants allege that sergeants who failed on their first go of the April 18, 2015 test formally known as Lieutenants Promotional Exam No. 5535 had two months to study questions and answers that were posted on cop blog Rising Star prior to the make-up date.

The blog contained a photo showing all of the correct answers which were identical to an answer key eventually provided to cops during a protest session in which officers could complain about questions they think are unfair or erroneous, the suit says.

Of the 2,401 sergeants who took the April 18 test, only 164 or 6.8 percent passed, compared to 48 percent who passed of the 80 officers who took the makeup, court documents say.

Sergeants who took the make-up test Jewish applicants who observe the Sabbath, others who were on military leave, and sergeants injured when the test was first offered passed at a significantly higher rate, The Post previously reported.

We will review all the claims, said a spokesman for the city Law Department.

An internal investigation into whether the testing process was corrupted is still ongoing, according to a police official.

At the end of the day, you want to focus on the people who may have been involved in the wrongdoing and not penalize those who did nothing wrong, said the official. Its a real dilemma here because you have to be fair to everybody.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 202
Date:

 

 

Just my opinions:

I still believe this still not considered cheating.   Unless a party illegally obtained the answer key or questions from DCAS.   There is no swearing to secrecy for test takers.   A test taker can talk as much as they want about it even when others has not taken an exam yet.   And for the guy who gave out questions verbatim, who is to say he doesn't have great memory. I just can't grasp how any of these arguments are valid.   Just because the press writes about it, does not make anything a valid point.   Look how the media gets a lot of things wrong with us.     Courts would have to prove how he obtained the questions and answers. Was he taking about it BEFORE the April 18 exam?  If so, then you got something. Is there a rule or law somewhere that specifically States that we can't post or talk about the test AFTER we take it?? I don't believe so. ....good luck with proving that.   Again, there is no confidentiality clause that I am aware of. 

I am not taking any side here, just playing devil's advocate.  These are just facts that can be picked apart by a defense in a court of law.   A lot of the argument does not sound like it can hold up.   To those suing, I really hope your efforts with this are fruitless. Because you sound like crybabies that failed yourselves by overstudying, getting burnt out, didnt balance work, study and family- now uou want a cop out.  Study and take the exam again like I will.

But, if this exam is held up, they should reactivate the 2011 exam and promote those who scored in the high 60s. Lol



-- Edited by Boogie Knight on Thursday 24th of March 2016 10:59:36 AM



-- Edited by Boogie Knight on Thursday 24th of March 2016 11:12:16 AM 



__________________
I'm a star. I'm a star. I'm a star. I'm a star. I'm a bright shining star.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 652
Date:

"At the end of the day, you want to focus on the people who may have been involved in the wrongdoing and not penalize those who did nothing wrong, said the official. Its a real dilemma here because you have to be fair to everybody."

Not penalize those who did nothing wrong? Am I missing something here or is that not exactly what they did?



-- Edited by sixmonthwonder on Friday 25th of March 2016 03:29:55 AM

__________________

Darth-Vader-and-Storm-Trooper-dance.gif



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 201
Date:

What are the odds the city says we can't just freeze the hiring of LTs, it would be easier, faster and cheaper to give a new test....

 

I'm assuming the lawsuit would take months if not years to make its way through the courts. There's no way they can wait that long if the judge decides to freeze promotions. 



-- Edited by CappedOut on Friday 25th of March 2016 11:14:31 AM

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us