RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to order our questions specifically designed for maximum retention of the Patrol Guide--plus full-length exams!

isn't #13 a Dominican guy? Sabbath?????

Next to #6 it says UNK, but I can shed some light on this mega scammer.

He was in Intel and the Friday night before the exam, he swore out an emergency gun sight search warrant that he claimed had to be executed on Saturday morning.  He could have easily passed the warrant onto someone else or made the cop the affiant.  He was able to take the makeup exam under the "police necessity" clause.

 

SHAME!

IShredMajors wrote:

---

Next to #6 it says UNK, but I can shed some light on this mega scammer.

He was in Intel and the Friday night before the exam, he swore out an emergency gun sight search warrant that he claimed had to be executed on Saturday morning.  He could have easily passed the warrant onto someone else or made the cop the affiant.  He was able to take the makeup exam under the "police necessity" clause.

 

SHAME!

---

Thank you for the info! 

Grammar: the difference between knowing your sh1t and knowing you're sh1t.

-- Edited by IShredMajors on Thursday 25th of February 2016 02:41:18 AM

This exam was not designed for people to pass. Applicants applied to Harvard university have approximately a 5.8% chance of getting into the school. Sergeants have a 5% to 7% of passing this exam on the initial exam date! Even though a majority of the population on this JOB is not very well educated...it does not mean that any of us are any less intelligent either. So therefore, DCAS and the Department have screwed all of us majorly by setting us up for failure. Passing an exam should not be a "lucky Saturday", it should be a guarantee to pass for people that actually study and remember the materials associated with their line of work. Questions on any "fair and straight forward" exam should be consistent with the job duties/requirements that the applicant is applying for (Lieutenant Duties) and not questions that stem from obscured and impractical Patrol Guide procedures!

sixmonthwonder wrote:

---

SATCOM wrote:

---

isn't #13 a Dominican guy? Sabbath?????

---

Could be a 7th Day Advantage-ist, no? 

---

He is a seventh day Adventist. A cop said he drove around the test site on test day and prentended he was taking the test with everyone else.

These guys are all opportunist. They took advantage of a situation that allows them to have a huge advantage over everyone else. Would anyone of us do the same, if allowed? I would like to think that my morals and ethics would dessuade me from doing so, but who knows.

I made the list because I feel that we deserve to know who the make-up test takers are. The make-up test takers should not hide the fact that they took a make up test.  With that said, the bashing, I don't think it's necessary. They know who they are. Their reputation will follow them. If they like to be men and women with no integrity, then that's on them. Let them be. 

They deserve to be exposed. I know of one person who used the military excuse to pass two tests. He's currently a LT in bk. I "heard" when he was studying for SGT he went around the command asking people for the questions and answers. Worst part is, idiots actually gave it to him. As a result, his promotion date was back dated which allowed him to be eligible for the 2011 Lt's test which he also passed. (He took that test at a much later date as well) Moral of the story is, we need to fight against this flawed system.

-- Edited by NewUser on Thursday 25th of February 2016 02:39:03 PM

#128 peralta... MILITARY... Did it for the sgt's exam too.

#42.... Miller... LOD... Smh... Wow

If # 22 is legit, he's the real #1 on this list

Mr.Levy you're a FRAUD and a big time CHEATER !!!!

Does anyone know if #24 is legit?

22, 24, 27, 30----are the original top 4. 

ProfessorFiveZero wrote:

---

I have no pony in this race. That being said I can spot at least 2 people being labeled as scammers when they are not. One was labeled a sabbath observer by one fella, and LOD by another fella, all s/he needs is military and s/he will be the holy trifecta of scammers. Makes me wonder about others. Where are people getting their info? Seems to me like just the rumour mill trying to put a little hatorade into the mix.

---

 the list should be taken down if that's the case. This is not the first time it has been inaccurate.

Devil Dog wrote:

---

ProfessorFiveZero wrote:

---

I have no pony in this race. That being said I can spot at least 2 people being labeled as scammers when they are not. One was labeled a sabbath observer by one fella, and LOD by another fella, all s/he needs is military and s/he will be the holy trifecta of scammers. Makes me wonder about others. Where are people getting their info? Seems to me like just the rumour mill trying to put a little hatorade into the mix.

---

 the list should be taken down if that's the case. This is not the first time it has been inaccurate.

---

No it shouldn't, it should be corrected. Nikki said it's going by what other people are telling her and if you see someone with an asterisks that shouldn't have one let her know and she'll remove it.

sixmonthwonder wrote:

---

Devil Dog wrote:

---

ProfessorFiveZero wrote:

---

I have no pony in this race. That being said I can spot at least 2 people being labeled as scammers when they are not. One was labeled a sabbath observer by one fella, and LOD by another fella, all s/he needs is military and s/he will be the holy trifecta of scammers. Makes me wonder about others. Where are people getting their info? Seems to me like just the rumour mill trying to put a little hatorade into the mix.

---

 the list should be taken down if that's the case. This is not the first time it has been inaccurate.

---

No it shouldn't, it should be corrected. Nikki said it's going by what other people are telling her and if you see someone with an asterisks that shouldn't have one let her know and she'll remove it.

---

 Nikki is going by third party info and hearsay. It's not cool when it happens to the same guy 2x. Looks like sour grapes now. Get over it and move on already

No, this is important. Stop trying to hide this info, what are you worried about? You on this list?

I agree, don't take this down. Fix as needed.

Nope. I don't need to take exams on alternate dates to pass. I also don't need throw outs or changes. Multiple people have been falsely accused of cheating on that list, I don't think that's acceptable. anyways, its over and likely that nothing will change. Time for people to move on 

Thanks for the clarification. I still think we should try to change it for the future and collecting this data will help. Once we have all of the alternate test scores we can make charts showing how much better they scored than the rest of us.

PD2FD wrote:

---

Devil Dog wrote:

---

Nope. I don't need to take exams on alternate dates to pass. I also don't need throw outs or changes. Multiple people have been falsely accused of cheating on that list, I don't think that's acceptable. anyways, its over and likely that nothing will change. Time for people to move on 

---

 WRONG !!! Things will change and SOME not ALL cheaters will be passed over on the basis of cheating. This happened to the #1 guy on the 2013 Sgts list. He's being investigated for cheating on the test and scoring a 99. He apparently bragged about cheating and people dropped logs on his a$$.

---

 wow

Suckerpunched wrote:

---

I have been asking for this UPDATED list for 2 weeks.

What happened to the FOIL request?

---

The first post on this thread is the updated list.  The original poster updated it on March 5th.

sixmonthwonder wrote:

---

ondeeair2321 wrote:

---

22, 24, 27, 30----are the original top 4. 

---

I heard that 28 was legit as well. So 22, 24, 27, 28, 30 would be original top five if that's the case. Have you heard different? 

---

I stand corrected, after further investigation it seems 28 took a makeup exam. So ondeeair's top four stands as of now. 22, 24, 27 and 30.

sixmonthwonder wrote:

---

sixmonthwonder wrote:

---

ondeeair2321 wrote:

---

22, 24, 27, 30----are the original top 4. 

---

I heard that 28 was legit as well. So 22, 24, 27, 28, 30 would be original top five if that's the case. Have you heard different? 

---

I stand corrected, after further investigation it seems 28 took a makeup exam. So ondeeair's top four stands as of now. 22, 24, 27 and 30.

---

 I know for a 100% fact that 28 did not take a makeup. not sure what kind of "investigation" took place

Cheaterpolice wrote:

---

sixmonthwonder wrote:

---

sixmonthwonder wrote:

---

ondeeair2321 wrote:

---

22, 24, 27, 30----are the original top 4. 

---

I heard that 28 was legit as well. So 22, 24, 27, 28, 30 would be original top five if that's the case. Have you heard different? 

---

I stand corrected, after further investigation it seems 28 took a makeup exam. So ondeeair's top four stands as of now. 22, 24, 27 and 30.

---

 I know for a 100% fact that 28 did not take a makeup. not sure what kind of "investigation" took place

---

Check your PM.