RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to subscribe to our mailing list and get info on the next Sgt, Lt. or Captain Exam!
I know I can't speak for everyone else, but I didn't finish reading PG even once. I stopped at 207 in Elite Guide, thought I could not possibly learn from reading PG, so I only focused on the packets from both schools.
Doesn't matter what u studied , just matters if u guessed right ..nobody studied those OO
Stop being a hater. Are you telling me people guessed 70 questions correctly?
Unless you studied your heart out, you had no chance of passing this exam. Those who studied the hardest did better than those who studied hard, and those who thought they were going to study to get a 70 on this test had their butts handed to them.
I am not saying this test was fair. This was a ridiculously hard exam designed to fail as many people as possible - but at the end of the day, if you did not show up intending on scoring 90 or above on a normal test, you had no chance of passing.
I know that there are a lot of people who put the time in, and did their best only to score somewhere in the high 60's. Yes it sucks, but at the end of the day, we all took the same test as the next guy. It was a hard test for everyone. It has nothing to do with luck, or guessing correctly.
I started studying as soon as the test was announced. I did not read ANY packets, I read the PG cover to cover about a dozen times, and did all of the questions I could get my hands on; Key, elite, rising star and academy questions. If I got a question wrong, I took my time and read that entire section.
Obviously this test was designed to have everyone fail. A few hardcore studiers barely passed. Hopefully with some throw outs all who studied will pass. But there was no luck here.
I personally read the Pg and key packets. Did all questions I could find. Reviewed recent Lbb and even some OO (not the ones tested). Was aiming for 90's and now I'm thanking God I squeezed through with a 74.
All questions from key, elite and academy. I kept stats and averaged 91% on all those questions (there were more than 3000 questions combined). Any question I got wrong, I analyzed the PG procedure with a fine tooth comb.
All questions from key, elite and academy. I kept stats and averaged 91% on all those questions (there were more than 3000 questions combined). Any question I got wrong, I analyzed the PG procedure with a fine tooth comb.
All questions from key, elite and academy. I kept stats and averaged 91% on all those questions (there were more than 3000 questions combined). Any question I got wrong, I analyzed the PG procedure with a fine tooth comb.
Scored raw 81 on test.
very impressive, good for you buddy
I hope that did not come across as me bragging, because that was absolutely not the intention. i think it was 2 things that got me to pass:
1) The 3000+ questions I took were all within 1 month of the exam. the trickery in some of the practice questions was used in some aspect of the test we took. I don't think I would have passed if I didn't go through all those questions.
2) I was lucky that I was the only person studying in my unit, so I was able to get 3 vacation weeks before the test off. Yes, I burned 3 vacation weeks, these were not chart days... I don't think I would have passed if I had to work the 3 weeks before the test.
It was about 80% playing World of Warcraft with the sound all the way up and then another 20% of reading the Narnia books and Alice in Wonderland backwards. That had all the info you needed to pass.
In seriousness, I would say about 40% practice exams from every school in existence, 30% flashcards I made on my own, 20% fill-ins and packets, and about 10% reading the actual Patrol Guide and other Department manuals. Also I listened to almost nothing but Yanosik reading the Patrol Guide in my car for eight months straight. I studied extremely hard, but I still got lucky.
Taking time off for any promotional exam is crazy. Why would you burn time off to study when the job gives 7 months to prepare. I prefer to use my vacation days for leisure and vacation. I feel if you took time off for this exam and failed you got double f&%cked.
Read the elite guide probably 4x front to back...barely looked at packets unless it was for questions...never read the admin guide at all...LBB slightly
Taking time off for any promotional exam is crazy. Why would you burn time off to study when the job gives 7 months to prepare. I prefer to use my vacation days for leisure and vacation. I feel if you took time off for this exam and failed you got double f&%cked.
I took about four weeks total to study when counting 2014 and 2015 (two weeks from each), plus was taking a chart day in the middle of the week for the last two months before the exam.
Yeah, taking a few weeks off to make half a million dollars in salary and pension over the course of your career sure is crazy. I like taking trips as much as the next guy and I agree I would be upset I wasted it if I failed, but I thought it was a good decision and I'm glad I did it in hindsight.
Doesn't matter what u studied , just matters if u guessed right ..nobody studied those OO
Stop being a hater. Are you telling me people guessed 70 questions correctly?
Unless you studied your heart out, you had no chance of passing this exam. Those who studied the hardest did better than those who studied hard, and those who thought they were going to study to get a 70 on this test had their butts handed to them.
I am not saying this test was fair. This was a ridiculously hard exam designed to fail as many people as possible - but at the end of the day, if you did not show up intending on scoring 90 or above on a normal test, you had no chance of passing.
I know that there are a lot of people who put the time in, and did their best only to score somewhere in the high 60's. Yes it sucks, but at the end of the day, we all took the same test as the next guy. It was a hard test for everyone. It has nothing to do with luck, or guessing correctly.
I started studying as soon as the test was announced. I did not read ANY packets, I read the PG cover to cover about a dozen times, and did all of the questions I could get my hands on; Key, elite, rising star and academy questions. If I got a question wrong, I took my time and read that entire section.
I studied my heart out and ended with a 66. I did all of yanos coursework even read the legal bulletins. The ops orders killed me. No ops orders =70 for me
No fked up inbasket= mid 80s for me so I truly believe it was a guessing game.
Not trying to disrespect anyone who passed. You passed then good for you but this exam was designed in my opinion to make you burn a lot of time on the inbasket thus leaving you to run out of time.
sorry man...iif you did all those things...that should equal a passing grade. Sounds like youre not a good nypd test taker. I dont mean it as a dig in anyway. But there are ways to study and take nypd tests. I have talked in depth with captains and lts who studied for only 2-3 months for these tests who just happen to be great test takers and realize what to study or what not. I got 9 wrong in in basket...i got every op order wrong..and i got an 83. Your making excuses for something you dropped the ball on. With all those questions wrong, i was able to get 4-5 patrol guide questions wrong. So according to your analysis....i guess if it wasnt a messed up test i should have gotten a 100. I got 40 percent wrong on in basket and 100 percent ops orders...I passed bc I exceed in pg questions.
-- Edited by sgt2be on Monday 25th of May 2015 12:53:46 PM
Test taking skills and time management were tested as much as patrol guide on this test. I know of several hardcore studiers that did not finish this exam. Simply memorizing the patrol guide was not enough if you were not able to move through the test quickly. As I said earlier, I did the same as everyone else on the technical knowledge portion of the exam, but I squeaked by with a 72 because I did the inbasket in under 2 hours and got "only" 8 wrong on it. This left me with 4:45 to do the rest of the test. Not saying the inbasket was reasonable, but it wasn't impossible if you are an efficient reader and time manager. I also got all the Ops Order questions wrong.
This test you had to know what to give up on ....I gave up on ops orders...the math question I gave up on until very end. These are vital to to reckonize on a test like this.
sorry man...iif you did all those things...that should equal a passing grade. Sounds like youre not a good nypd test taker. I dont mean it as a dig in anyway. But there are ways to study and take nypd tests. I have talked in depth with captains and lts who studied for only 2-3 months for these tests who just happen to be great test takers and realize what to study or what not. I got 9 wrong in in basket...i got every op order wrong..and i got an 83. Your making excuses for something you dropped the ball on. With all those questions wrong, i was able to get 4-5 patrol guide questions wrong. So according to your analysis....i guess if it wasnt a messed up test i should have gotten a 100. I got 40 percent wrong on in basket and 100 percent ops orders...I passed bc I exceed in pg questions.
-- Edited by sgt2be on Monday 25th of May 2015 12:53:46 PM
Well, I guess I am not a good test taker according to you. I exceed in a traditional in basket. 1 wrong on my sgts exam. 0 wrong on all yanos in baskets and rising star. The same people on here who before the protest session were saying the exam was not fair are now the same ones saying it was fair because they passed. Did fairly well on my sgts exam passed it the 1st go around. Hopefully a few questions get tossed. At this point it is what it is
We are our own worst enemy on this job. Apparently only 128 people who took this exam are qualified to be LT. And according to this board you guys concur with capt insano, the job, and DCAS. Good luck everyone who passed. I know not 1 person who passed.
-- Edited by New2this on Monday 25th of May 2015 03:29:26 PM
Well, I guess I am not a good test taker according to you. I exceed in a traditional in basket. 1 wrong on my sgts exam. 0 wrong on all yanos in baskets and rising star. The same people on here who before the protest session were saying the exam was not fair are now the same ones saying it was fair because they passed. Did fairly well on my sgts exam passed it the 1st go around. Hopefully a few questions get tossed. At this point it is what it is
We are our own worst enemy on this job. Apparently only 128 people who took this exam are qualified to be LT. And according to this board you guys concur with capt insano, the job, and DCAS. Good luck everyone who passed. I know not 1 person who passed.
-- Edited by New2this on Monday 25th of May 2015 03:29:26 PM
I don't think it was fair even though I passed. You have to understand many guys that passed this test were on top of the 2011 list. Some people take offense to the notion that this was a "guessing game" because we put our lives on hold for 8 months for this. A lot of people did the same and failed so it's a great accomplishment. I don't agree with SgT2be because he's coming off as a dick, but he's right in someways. This test was all about time management. You had to pick your battles, for example the math question was an automatic guess for me. I know that one question was not worth the 20 minutes, leaving the operations orders for last was a no brainer. Good test takers get the questions right some way some how.
-- Edited by wisecop on Monday 25th of May 2015 04:29:09 PM
__________________
Disclaimer: 'Regular' Elite -***NOT*** a 'True' Elite.
you guys are mistaken how I'm trying to come off. I don't mean to come off in any way as a prick. My point is we all bombed the in basket including myself. It was the pg questions that seperated the fields..I got 4 wrong on whole test. You didn't fail bc of in basket...u failed w pg. what's a fair test? Test was difficult no doubt. Fair or unfair is a personal decision I guess
People don't wanna hear that the test was difficult but passable. People just wanna hear that it was an impossible test, designed to make everyone fail, and anyone who passed guessed correctly on 50+ questions in a row. The inbasket required a Rosetta Stone and deep intricate knowledge of thermo-nuclear physics, and people who passed memorized Ops Orders instead of studying patol guide. Everyone who passed works in 1PP and IAB; they surveyed everyone at the door and patrol people were flagged for -10 points before the test started. People who failed are victims of Captain Insano's sorcery and there was nothing they could have done to improve their chances. It is not their fault, everyone is against them.
Follow this rhetoric and tell people what they wanna hear!!!
I agree with wisecop. I passed, I did fairly well on the test. I still will not say it was a fair test. I stand by all the horrible things I said about the test writers. But I did not pass by luck. It is statistically impossible. I put my friends, family and my son on hold for 7 months and I earned my passing grade. I repeat that I do not think it was a fair test because every question had layers of trickery in it and some obscure stuff was tested. I have several friends sitting in the 60's and I want nothing more than for them to pick up the points and be on this list.
Time management and mental stamina were 2 major factors in taking the test. I studied for 10+ hours per day in the final 4 weeks before the test (3 weeks vacation). If it wasn't for that, my brain would have been toast after the in basket.
Heres the thing about guessing. If you guess on 1 question thats 1 out of 4 chance of getting it right, those odds aren't that bad. There are people on here who scored in the mid 80's though. The odds of guessing your way into the 80's are virtually impossible. Sgt2be, for example, got an 83 on the test. Lets say he had a 68 and guessed correctly on 15, since peoples' argument is that people who passed simply "guessed correctly". The binomial probability of guessing correctly on 15 out of 32 questions is .004, or 1 in 250. What seems more likely, that he guessed on all of those or that he knew the answer?
The problem here is that when people study that hard and score that well, it's a little insulting to imply that they passed based on blind luck. I admitted in other threads that there was some luck involved in this test, but luck can only get you a couple points at the most. Everyone who passed was a hardcore studier, and some of those people had a little luck on their side as well. People passed a super difficult exam, don't diminish their accomplishment.
you guys are mistaken how I'm trying to come off. I don't mean to come off in any way as a prick. My point is we all bombed the in basket including myself. It was the pg questions that seperated the fields..I got 4 wrong on whole test. You didn't fail bc of in basket...u failed w pg. what's a fair test? Test was difficult no doubt. Fair or unfair is a personal decision I guess
You passed because 20 throwouts worked in your favor.
And if you failed because those 20 throwouts didnt work in your favor.
In other words out of those 20 throwouts its quite possible you got many of them wrong. They were eliminated and your score increased. On the other hand i could have got most of them right but they got thrownout and i lost points.