RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to subscribe to our mailing list and get info on the next Sgt, Lt. or Captain Exam!

90xGoodnight · Veteran Member

Question 89-E Day, valid point

90xGoodnight · Veteran Member

come on people mail in your protests, still have plenty of time, power in numbers especially with defined obvious points!

innocent1 · Senior Member

yes.....everyone please mail in your protest now! don't depends on others. you studied hard and was given an unfair test. power in protest. now or never. and u can mail away protest even if u never sent away pink slip or never had an appointment date could not make your date!

Rudy · Senior Member

That question in itself is why I Rudy, with my letter opener will never be more than a Sgt. Amen. I bombed the judgement questions

nohook · Veteran Member

i agree with 90xgoodnight on both post. uniform and eday. i also pick those same answer with your argument. when is the deadline to mail in protest.

Garbage_Compactor_Robot_Jesus · Member

In sum, you chose the answer that would require the officer to survey family members, thereby temporarily denying an infant urgent medical care. You also figured a general directive to be a non-exlusionary edict.

Yep, that was wrong.

No study material should have been necessary to see what they were getting at.

The question measured your ability to judge urgency and liability.

Ground ball.

RumorMill · Veteran Member

Garbage_Compactor_Robot_Jesus wrote:
In sum, you chose the answer that would require the officer to survey family members, thereby temporarily denying an infant urgent medical care. You also figured a general directive to be a non-exlusionary edict.
Yep, that was wrong.
No study material should have been necessary to see what they were getting at.
The question measured your ability to judge urgency and liability.
Ground ball.

Another 5 year wonder speaks.

WANNABELT · Veteran Member

RumorMill wrote:
Garbage_Compactor_Robot_Jesus wrote:
In sum, you chose the answer that would require the officer to survey family members, thereby temporarily denying an infant urgent medical care. You also figured a general directive to be a non-exlusionary edict.
Yep, that was wrong.
No study material should have been necessary to see what they were getting at.
The question measured your ability to judge urgency and liability.
Ground ball.

Another 5 year wonder speaks.

Rumormill sit down and vent. I understand that you were passed over because you are a loser and a hairbag and the Sgt with six years is ambitious and highly competant but unfortunately nobody in your present chain of cmd gives a fcuk about your time in rank. Im sure it annoys you that Im an 8 year Lt and you have to cry to me about these things but suck it up and drive on troop. Now go ahead and vent and I will nod and pretend to care about what you are saying.

-- Edited by WANNABELT on Wednesday 14th of December 2011 02:37:20 AM

RumorMill · Veteran Member

WANNABELT wrote:
RumorMill wrote:
Garbage_Compactor_Robot_Jesus wrote:
In sum, you chose the answer that would require the officer to survey family members, thereby temporarily denying an infant urgent medical care. You also figured a general directive to be a non-exlusionary edict.
Yep, that was wrong.
No study material should have been necessary to see what they were getting at.
The question measured your ability to judge urgency and liability.
Ground ball.

Another 5 year wonder speaks.

Rumormill sit down and vent. I understand that you were passed over because you are a loser and a hairbag and the Sgt with six years is ambitious and highly competant but unfortunately nobody in your present chain of cmd gives a fcuk about your time in rank. Im sure it annoys you that Im an 8 year Lt and you have to cry to me about these things but suck it up and drive on troop. Now go ahead and vent and I will nod and pretend to care about what you are saying.

-- Edited by WANNABELT on Wednesday 14th of December 2011 02:37:20 AM

They use to give a f**K about time on the job and time in rank and things worked alot better back then. The Job fell apart when that way of thinking went out the window. Hate to break it to you but passing this test doesnt mean your competant or ambitious. Just means you guessed better then the next guy. When its all said and done were both going to be on the same Lt's. anyway. Difference is I'll be tanning on the beach retired while your still working for another decade.

Tommy Salami · Senior Member

RumorMill wrote:
WANNABELT wrote:
RumorMill wrote:
Garbage_Compactor_Robot_Jesus wrote:
In sum, you chose the answer that would require the officer to survey family members, thereby temporarily denying an infant urgent medical care. You also figured a general directive to be a non-exlusionary edict.
Yep, that was wrong.
No study material should have been necessary to see what they were getting at.
The question measured your ability to judge urgency and liability.
Ground ball.

Another 5 year wonder speaks.

Rumormill sit down and vent. I understand that you were passed over because you are a loser and a hairbag and the Sgt with six years is ambitious and highly competant but unfortunately nobody in your present chain of cmd gives a fcuk about your time in rank. Im sure it annoys you that Im an 8 year Lt and you have to cry to me about these things but suck it up and drive on troop. Now go ahead and vent and I will nod and pretend to care about what you are saying.

-- Edited by WANNABELT on Wednesday 14th of December 2011 02:37:20 AM
They use to give a f**K about time on the job and time in rank and things worked alot better back then. The Job fell apart when that way of thinking went out the window. Hate to break it to you but passing this test doesnt mean your competant or ambitious. Just means you guessed better then the next guy. When its all said and done were both going to be on the same Lt's. anyway. Difference is I'll be tanning on the beach retired while your still working for another decade.

Just because you have 10 years in rank, or 20+ years on the job, doesn't mean you know what you're doing.

Also, just because someone passed this test doesn't mean, "they guessed better than the next guy." That statement just shows how frustrated and jealous you are.

You also need to work on your grammar and sentence structure.

Good luck with the DCAS throw-outs. Hope it works out for you.

TyWebb · Veteran Member

RumorMill wrote:
WANNABELT wrote:
RumorMill wrote:
Garbage_Compactor_Robot_Jesus wrote:
In sum, you chose the answer that would require the officer to survey family members, thereby temporarily denying an infant urgent medical care. You also figured a general directive to be a non-exlusionary edict.
Yep, that was wrong.
No study material should have been necessary to see what they were getting at.
The question measured your ability to judge urgency and liability.
Ground ball.

Another 5 year wonder speaks.

Rumormill sit down and vent. I understand that you were passed over because you are a loser and a hairbag and the Sgt with six years is ambitious and highly competant but unfortunately nobody in your present chain of cmd gives a fcuk about your time in rank. Im sure it annoys you that Im an 8 year Lt and you have to cry to me about these things but suck it up and drive on troop. Now go ahead and vent and I will nod and pretend to care about what you are saying.

-- Edited by WANNABELT on Wednesday 14th of December 2011 02:37:20 AM
They use to give a f**K about time on the job and time in rank and things worked alot better back then. The Job fell apart when that way of thinking went out the window. Hate to break it to you but passing this test doesnt mean your competant or ambitious. Just means you guessed better then the next guy. When its all said and donewere both going to be on the same Lt's. anyway. Difference is I'll be tanning on the beach retired while your still working for another decade.

Ah, the reasoning of a true failure. 20 years is 20 years, dummy. While you're getting skin cancer on the beach, he won't be doing an extra decade of police work. What he will be doing is significantly out-earning you over the course of his twenty. The rapid-fire unprovoked 'time on' defense is a favorite tool of the incompetent.

RumorMill · Veteran Member

Tommy Salami wrote:
RumorMill wrote:
WANNABELT wrote:
RumorMill wrote:
Garbage_Compactor_Robot_Jesus wrote:
In sum, you chose the answer that would require the officer to survey family members, thereby temporarily denying an infant urgent medical care. You also figured a general directive to be a non-exlusionary edict.
Yep, that was wrong.
No study material should have been necessary to see what they were getting at.
The question measured your ability to judge urgency and liability.
Ground ball.

Another 5 year wonder speaks.

Rumormill sit down and vent. I understand that you were passed over because you are a loser and a hairbag and the Sgt with six years is ambitious and highly competant but unfortunately nobody in your present chain of cmd gives a fcuk about your time in rank. Im sure it annoys you that Im an 8 year Lt and you have to cry to me about these things but suck it up and drive on troop. Now go ahead and vent and I will nod and pretend to care about what you are saying.

-- Edited by WANNABELT on Wednesday 14th of December 2011 02:37:20 AM
They use to give a f**K about time on the job and time in rank and things worked alot better back then. The Job fell apart when that way of thinking went out the window. Hate to break it to you but passing this test doesnt mean your competant or ambitious. Just means you guessed better then the next guy. When its all said and done were both going to be on the same Lt's. anyway. Difference is I'll be tanning on the beach retired while your still working for another decade.
Just because you have 10 years in rank, or 20+ years on the job, doesn't mean you know what you're doing.
Also, just because someone passed this test doesn't mean, "they guessed better than the next guy." That statement just shows how frustrated and jealous you are.
You also need to work on your grammar and sentence structure.
Good luck with the DCAS throw-outs. Hope it works out for you.

Tommy Salami: Didnt realize this was a test. Plus Im more of a texter so I never write a proper sentence when I am writing between "friends". We will agree to disagree.

Rudy · Senior Member

WANNABELT wrote:
RumorMill wrote:
Garbage_Compactor_Robot_Jesus wrote:
In sum, you chose the answer that would require the officer to survey family members, thereby temporarily denying an infant urgent medical care. You also figured a general directive to be a non-exlusionary edict.
Yep, that was wrong.
No study material should have been necessary to see what they were getting at.
The question measured your ability to judge urgency and liability.
Ground ball.

Another 5 year wonder speaks.

Rumormill sit down and vent. I understand that you were passed over because you are a loser and a hairbag and the Sgt with six years is ambitious and highly competant but unfortunately nobody in your present chain of cmd gives a fcuk about your time in rank. Im sure it annoys you that Im an 8 year Lt and you have to cry to me about these things but suck it up and drive on troop. Now go ahead and vent and I will nod and pretend to care about what you are saying.

-- Edited by WANNABELT on Wednesday 14th of December 2011 02:37:20 AM Wannabelt: you have hidden in an office for months to study, I know your type. As a cop you have 511 collars, as a sgt you couldn't wait to put a cop on paper, you have never been in a busy house, and most of all when you get promoted your sgt's, cops, x.o's and your c.o will recognize you as your true self. A TOOLBAG. Can't wait to see you at a detail D!(k

WANNABELT · Veteran Member

Rudy wrote:
WANNABELT wrote:
RumorMill wrote:
Garbage_Compactor_Robot_Jesus wrote:
In sum, you chose the answer that would require the officer to survey family members, thereby temporarily denying an infant urgent medical care. You also figured a general directive to be a non-exlusionary edict.
Yep, that was wrong.
No study material should have been necessary to see what they were getting at.
The question measured your ability to judge urgency and liability.
Ground ball.

Another 5 year wonder speaks.

Rumormill sit down and vent. I understand that you were passed over because you are a loser and a hairbag and the Sgt with six years is ambitious and highly competant but unfortunately nobody in your present chain of cmd gives a fcuk about your time in rank. Im sure it annoys you that Im an 8 year Lt and you have to cry to me about these things but suck it up and drive on troop. Now go ahead and vent and I will nod and pretend to care about what you are saying.

-- Edited by WANNABELT on Wednesday 14th of December 2011 02:37:20 AM Wannabelt: you have hidden in an office for months to study, I know your type. As a cop you have 511 collars, as a sgt you couldn't wait to put a cop on paper, you have never been in a busy house, and most of all when you get promoted your sgt's, cops, x.o's and your c.o will recognize you as your true self. A TOOLBAG. Can't wait to see you at a detail D!(k

I have made 511 collars. I've been in busy houses but I haven't been assigned to any(those places are dangerous). I wrote a cd to my driver. I hope the aformentioned UMOS recognize me as my true self. If you see me at a detail, please introduce yourself and let me know how you feel in person.

Abeyance · Senior Member

Not for nothing (but for something though) , what is the point of all this ****, and I am better than you are attitude? There is no right answer to all this garbage, don't you realize. Give it a break and dignify one another with dialogue that is befitting a man.

RumorMill · Veteran Member

Abeyance wrote:
Not for nothing (but for something though) , what is the point of all this ****, and I am better than you are attitude? There is no right answer to all this garbage, don't you realize. Give it a break and dignify one another with dialogue that is befitting a man.

OK. But I didnt deny the guy the eday. I just told him to see if someone else can take the kid to the hospital. See how I'm trying to bring it back to the subject.