The city has responded to the lawsuit. Within this response it can be determined that the TVB LTs suggested Zero Throwouts. dcas in fact did state what we should have studied without mentioning Ops orders and ccrg by name (Dcas is not required to, and has city rules to back em up). Also stated in the response was that tvb is binding, the LTs knew exactly what they were doing and the 12 rumor was a complete fabrication.
Sarge said
May 25, 2016
I always felt like these lieutenants were responsible at least in part......
CappedOut said
May 25, 2016
How do you know the city responded (and that was their response)?
Devil Dog said
May 25, 2016
CappedOut wrote:
How do you know the city responded (and that was their response)?
Public record brother. They are not negotiating.
Team J said
May 25, 2016
Devil Dog wrote:
CappedOut wrote:
How do you know the city responded (and that was their response)?
Public record brother. They are not negotiating.
can you post it or tell me how I can review the response
Contraband said
May 25, 2016
Team J wrote:
Devil Dog wrote:
CappedOut wrote:
How do you know the city responded (and that was their response)?
Public record brother. They are not negotiating.
can you post it or tell me how I can review the response
It depends... Are you elite 164 or fraudulent 40?
Samiam32 said
May 26, 2016
DCAS responded to my foil request and states that 191 passed on 4/18/15
soccerpsyco32 said
May 26, 2016
The city has responded and once again, they have the full force of the law and prior precedent behind them. This will be over shortly. Again.
Sarge said
May 26, 2016
hopefully the full force of the judge and bratton set them straight...
70please said
May 26, 2016
Let's not forget a huge majority of this mess is the jobs fault ... Every sergeant wants to attack every Sgt and dcas this and dcas that...
I ask you this .. Who wrote the questions , who did that captain work for ? Who choose that captain to oversee this test ? Who allowed the years upon years of make up shenanigans .. The job
CappedOut said
May 26, 2016
Devil Dog wrote:
CappedOut wrote:
How do you know the city responded (and that was their response)?
The city has responded to the lawsuit. Within this response it can be determined that the TVB LTs suggested Zero Throwouts. dcas in fact did state what we should have studied without mentioning Ops orders and ccrg by name (Dcas is not required to, and has city rules to back em up). Also stated in the response was that tvb is binding, the LTs knew exactly what they were doing and the 12 rumor was a complete fabrication.
I always felt like these lieutenants were responsible at least in part......
Public record brother. They are not negotiating.
can you post it or tell me how I can review the response
It depends... Are you elite 164 or fraudulent 40?
hopefully the full force of the judge and bratton set them straight...
I ask you this .. Who wrote the questions , who did that captain work for ? Who choose that captain to oversee this test ? Who allowed the years upon years of make up shenanigans .. The job
Where? I had no luck trying to find iit