This is the link to the website that has the lawsuit just atnenticate urself by entering the numbers that appear on the screen and u will be able to read it. It has everything in it.
http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/iscroll/SQLData.jsp?IndexNo=102367-2012&Submit2=Search#
-- Edited by SISGT on Friday 6th of April 2012 06:36:03 PM
Hs81 said
Apr 6, 2012
FYI, how about this conspiracy theory.
Supposedly this Esposito chick (no relation to current Chief of Dept.) is the daughter of a former Chief on this job. She is going to die on the list as is. However, Kelly not wanting it to look like nepotism, couldn't outright extend the current list without raising eyebrows. So what happens? A test that is filled with factual errors, mistakes, etc is given, knowing full well the outcome will be a pending lawsuit, thus giving him a way to extend the list without it looking like nepotism, and thus allowing this former Chiefs daughter to be promoted, who otherwise would of died on the list.
Just saying..........................
-- Edited by Hs81 on Friday 6th of April 2012 06:54:43 PM
Jimmy McNulty said
Apr 6, 2012
Here's a question, where are the promotional schools in all of this? I mean, these guys took hundreds of thousands of dollars from us and have not updated their websites since the test. I know the Captains test is looming but these chiefs and inspectors should keep their students abreast of what's happening, I'm sure most of them know a lot more than us. Never mind the fact none of these schools prepared us for what was coming and kept our money anyway, the least they could do is post a message or update on their website. As for the lawsuit, if it wasn't the NYPD id say this is rediculous but knowing our job it probably will hold up those who fought tooth and nail to pass this test. I passed, and I was pissed at the way they administered it, but I pushed myself every minute of those 6 hours to fight every question into a potential right answer, as many others did. Guess that means nothing.
"One day I want to work for a real Police Department"
-- Edited by Jimmy McNulty on Friday 6th of April 2012 08:46:41 PM
-- Edited by Jimmy McNulty on Friday 6th of April 2012 08:59:19 PM
HabidasheryAuto said
Apr 6, 2012
Im going to Injunct my fist in someones face.
-- Edited by HabidasheryAuto on Friday 6th of April 2012 09:59:52 PM
SISGT said
Apr 6, 2012
Keep the names it's the wall of shame. Mess with the bull u get the horns.
-- Edited by SISGT on Friday 6th of April 2012 09:59:34 PM
unborn said
Apr 7, 2012
I like how they spelled the Police Commissioner's name wrong. Might wanna get your money back folks.
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
Just read it, he's just trying to extend the 2006 LT exam by killing our list. That's crazy.
GLG20 said
Apr 7, 2012
8 or 9 dopes. Big deal. 2011 failures would be nuts to hop on board this.
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
From the lawsuit "Any determination to change the answer key to the Examination and "throw out" certain questions does not remedy the nature of the October 29, 2011 Promotion to Lieutenant Examination because the format of the test was arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion in that it provided newly amended and additional subject matters with various reasonable answers which required candidates to devote substantial time to consider these questions which diverted and prevented candidates from devoting the necessary time allotted for the entirety of the examine in order to provide for a competitive examination. Respondents should be restrained from making a new eligibility for promotion to Lieutenant based on the October 29, 2011 Promotion to Lieutenant Examination Number 1534"
NextLtTest said
Apr 7, 2012
They spelled Kelly's name wrong, LOL...... I am going to go buy my white shirts now. What a joke.
Garbage_Compactor_Robot_Jesus said
Apr 7, 2012
I told you people we had big names on board with us! and some of u all said no! we will make sure the right people will be Lts for the reasons that are best!
You still can join us!
defaultuser said
Apr 7, 2012
Total joke. Looks like it was written by some third tier law school grad and edited by a PAA. Good luck.
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
Hs81 wrote:
FYI, how about this conspiracy theory.
Supposedly this Esposito chick (no relation to current Chief of Dept.) is the daughter of a former Chief on this job. She is going to die on the list as is. However, Kelly not wanting it to look like nepotism, couldn't outright extend the current list without raising eyebrows. So what happens? A test that is filled with factual errors, mistakes, etc is given, knowing full well the outcome will be a pending lawsuit, thus giving him a way to extend the list without it looking like nepotism, and thus allowing this former Chiefs daughter to be promoted, who otherwise would of died on the list.
Just saying..........................
-- Edited by Hs81 on Friday 6th of April 2012 06:54:43 PM
What's interesting is that if you read the lawsuit she's actually one of the plaintiffs that signs at the very end.
maverick said
Apr 7, 2012
LOL WOW I RECOGNIZE ATLEAST 3 OF THOSE NAMES ON THAT WEAK CRYBABY LAWSUIT...ALL 2006 REJECTS. Have a little bit of pride you zeros...your list numbers did not get called..should have studied a little harder on that kindergarden exam in 2006. Good luck anyway. lol. good for a laugh.
HabidasheryAuto said
Apr 7, 2012
I love these one way C*nts from the 2006 list, suing on the basis that our 2011 test was unfair. What a crock of ****. Now will these 2006 cry babies go to work and say good morning to their peers who did pass the 2011 test and pretend to be friends. Bet you never thought youd be exposed!! "hey guys, I know i didnt take your exam and I know you passed, but I passed 5 years ago, so **** you Im suing, waaa waaa waaa. Im going to sue that YOUR test was UNFAIR, so that MY list will be extended." Doesnt get any more one way than that. Have fun looking at yourself in the mirror.
Stanza said
Apr 7, 2012
U hit the nail on the head.
NextLtTest said
Apr 7, 2012
Garbage_Compactor_Robot_Jesus wrote:
we will make sure the right people will be Lts for the reasons that are best!
Scary.
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
One petitioner is in the high 900's on the 2006 Exam.
getalife said
Apr 7, 2012
So the following are degenerates that think the world owes them. Thinks because they didn't score well enough or score high enough that society should punish others so they can succeed!! Failures in life. Disease to society!!!
TAMAS BALATONI JUAN BASTIDAS GREGORY CASELLA SUSAN DOWNING-KOHN ALISON ESPOSITO KEVIN FARRELL PAUL FERRERA RAMON FIALLO GREGORY GREEN JULIE GUTHOFF ANTHONY LAFAUCI WILLIAM MAHER LOURDES MORALES RAYMOND MORALES RICHARD PORTO EVELYN RIVERA YVETTE VALENTIN CONDRA WINSTON MARSHALL WINSTON
SISGT said
Apr 7, 2012
I must say majority of 2006 list r ok they did not sue. Only a minute handful of losers did. Boy but those few will have fun walking into a command on Monday and for some even tonight lol
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
SISGT wrote:
I must say majority of 2006 list r ok they did not sue. Only a minute handful of losers did. Boy but those few will have fun walking into a command on Monday and for some even tonight lol
Honestly I'm not even mad about the lawsuit it's more the language that upsets me. Their trying to get the 2011 LT exam thrown out KNOWING that Civil Service Law does not justify the extension of their list. That to me is so one way.
HabidasheryAuto said
Apr 7, 2012
didnt the law firm originally want 100 petitioners at $250 a pop. you think these 19 desperate cry babies covered the rest?
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
HabidasheryAuto wrote:
didnt the law firm originally want 100 petitioners at $250 a pop. you think these 19 desperate cry babies covered the rest?
That's a good question. Who knows and don't really care. Honestly I would love to see the list come out next week and promotions at the end of the month. That would be hilarious lol lol.
Jimmy McNulty said
Apr 7, 2012
Oh, and the people on that list should go work for Corrections. Imagine this happened 20 years ago, how embarrassing. :(,,,,,,,,
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
Jimmy McNulty wrote:
Here's a question, where are the promotional schools in all of this? I mean, these guys took hundreds of thousands of dollars from us and have not updated their websites since the test. I know the Captains test is looming but these chiefs and inspectors should keep their students abreast of what's happening, I'm sure most of them know a lot more than us. Never mind the fact none of these schools prepared us for what was coming and kept our money anyway, the least they could do is post a message or update on their website. As for the lawsuit, if it wasn't the NYPD if day this is rediculous but knowing our job it probably will hold up those who fought tooth and nail to pass this test. I passed, and I was pissed at the way they administered it, but I pushed myself every minute of those 6 hours to fight every question into a potential right answer, as many others did. Guess that means nothing. "One day I want to work for a real Police Department"
-- Edited by Jimmy McNulty on Friday 6th of April 2012 08:46:41 PM
I would be shocked if an injunction is granted.
Jimmy McNulty said
Apr 7, 2012
Just the mere fact that you have Sergeants of Police in the biggest Police Department in the world crying like 12 year old school girls is sickening, regardless of the outcome. Hopefully none of those people have family on the job from the old days because they will surely be disgusted with their sons/daughters. Lists die, it happens, get back on the horse and try harder next time.
1534sux said
Apr 7, 2012
Does this mean we will be waiting till after May 1st for our list
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
HabidasheryAuto wrote:
Im going to Injuct my fist in someones face.
Lol
HabidasheryAuto said
Apr 7, 2012
The best part is they are mostly 2006 list members, and their whole strategy is suing because OUR test was unfair. HOLY ****IN **** that infuriates me. So much for brotherhood. ****IN CUT THROAT BUSH LEAGUE PANZI'S!!!!
OkeeDokee said
Apr 7, 2012
1534sux wrote:
Does this mean we will be waiting till after May 1st for our list
No. Unless we were going to wait that long anyway...
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
OkeeDokee wrote:
1534sux wrote:
Does this mean we will be waiting till after May 1st for our list
No. Unless we were going to wait that long anyway...
I think the department because of the lawsuit will probably wait to release the list after the May 1st court appearance.
ShutYourBitchAssUp said
Apr 7, 2012
Well they can hold on to the list but it doesn't prevent DCAS from releasing the final key right?
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
ShutYourBitchAssUp wrote:
Well they can hold on to the list but it doesn't prevent DCAS from releasing the final key right?
Not sure cause dcas is also named in the lawsuit.
OkeeDokee said
Apr 7, 2012
As of now, both entities can do whatever they want.
Jimmy McNulty said
Apr 7, 2012
I just read on Kellys Facebook page that he's furious and releasing the list tonight.
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
Jimmy McNulty wrote:
I just read on Kellys Facebook page that he's furious and releasing the list tonight.
Lol
PogMoThoin said
Apr 7, 2012
getalife wrote:
So the following are degenerates that think the world owes them. Thinks because they didn't score well enough or score high enough that society should punish others so they can succeed!! Failures in life. Disease to society!!!
TAMAS BALATONI JUAN BASTIDAS GREGORY CASELLA SUSAN DOWNING-KOHN ALISON ESPOSITO KEVIN FARRELL PAUL FERRERA RAMON FIALLO GREGORY GREEN JULIE GUTHOFF ANTHONY LAFAUCI WILLIAM MAHER LOURDES MORALES RAYMOND MORALES RICHARD PORTO EVELYN RIVERA YVETTE VALENTIN CONDRA WINSTON MARSHALL WINSTON
Will the mod please take down these names. Its not right to put our brother and sister Sgt's names on a public forum. We can have a cordial debate without it getting nasty.
Jimmy McNulty said
Apr 7, 2012
Well champ, when you file a civil suit the names of both the petitioners and the respondents are entered into public record. You must have missed that rule, it's next to the one that says lists die after 4 years in this city.
Gamblor said
Apr 7, 2012
PogMoThoin wrote:
getalife wrote:
So the following are degenerates that think the world owes them. Thinks because they didn't score well enough or score high enough that society should punish others so they can succeed!! Failures in life. Disease to society!!!
TAMAS BALATONI JUAN BASTIDAS GREGORY CASELLA SUSAN DOWNING-KOHN ALISON ESPOSITO KEVIN FARRELL PAUL FERRERA RAMON FIALLO GREGORY GREEN JULIE GUTHOFF ANTHONY LAFAUCI WILLIAM MAHER LOURDES MORALES RAYMOND MORALES RICHARD PORTO EVELYN RIVERA YVETTE VALENTIN CONDRA WINSTON MARSHALL WINSTON
Will the mod please take down these names. Its not right to put our brother and sister Sgt's names on a public forum. We can have a cordial debate without it getting nasty.
They made their names part of the PUBLIC forum when they filed a PUBLIC document. They can retract their petition or suck it up.
wereinbacklog said
Apr 7, 2012
Jimmy McNulty wrote:
Well champ, when you file a civil suit the names of both the petitioners and the respondents are entered into public record. You must have missed that rule, it's next to the one that says lists die after 4 years in this city.
LMAO
infinity said
Apr 7, 2012
If the lawsuit goes thru everyone should drop a log on them lol
WANNABELT_ said
Apr 7, 2012
infinity wrote:
If the lawsuit goes thru everyone should drop a log on them lol
Being a rat fcuking scumbag is never the answer to anything.
infinity said
Apr 7, 2012
It was a joke bro. Relax!
PFB said
Apr 7, 2012
Gamblor wrote:
PogMoThoin wrote:
getalife wrote:
So the following are degenerates that think the world owes them. Thinks because they didn't score well enough or score high enough that society should punish others so they can succeed!! Failures in life. Disease to society!!!
TAMAS BALATONI JUAN BASTIDAS GREGORY CASELLA SUSAN DOWNING-KOHN ALISON ESPOSITO KEVIN FARRELL PAUL FERRERA RAMON FIALLO GREGORY GREEN JULIE GUTHOFF ANTHONY LAFAUCI WILLIAM MAHER LOURDES MORALES RAYMOND MORALES RICHARD PORTO EVELYN RIVERA YVETTE VALENTIN CONDRA WINSTON MARSHALL WINSTON
Will the mod please take down these names. Its not right to put our brother and sister Sgt's names on a public forum. We can have a cordial debate without it getting nasty.
They made their names part of the PUBLIC forum when they filed a PUBLIC document. They can retract their petition or suck it up.
Hey if the lawsuit fails put in for IAB!! Within 2 months you will be promoted to SA!!! You earned it paying a lawyer to delay the 2011 list!!
HB said
Apr 7, 2012
WANNABELT_ wrote:
infinity wrote:
If the lawsuit goes thru everyone should drop a log on them lol
Being a rat fcuking scumbag is never the answer to anything.
Infinity looks like u struck a nerve! Whats a matter Wannabelt? Reliving some not so wonderful moments u p*ssy.
SISGT said
Apr 7, 2012
In order to make SDS in Iab u have to have no time in rank and be embroiled in some huge case with ur name plastered all over the papers as the bad guy because this job can't keep it's mouth shut.
Hs81 said
Apr 7, 2012
lol.
justice4allpd said
Apr 7, 2012
Lawyers office 212 962 8020 the process has started. If you have any questions regarding this lawsuit you may contact the attorney Michelle Pomerantz at 212 962-8020. If you are interested in taking part in this action Please e-mail me your contact information to justice4allpd@aol.com.
SISGT said
Apr 7, 2012
Why would anyone want to join that abortion of a lawsuit and become an outcast?
doctorjay said
Apr 7, 2012
im sure the person who posted to remove the names is part of that bogus lawsuit. unbelievable how obvious it is that the lawsuit is to extend the 2006 list. its been over 5 years with this list... come on already... was the 2011 test a joke??? absolutely... i failed... but lets get on with the list and worry about throw outs and doubles and when the next test will be given. suck it up and keep those names posted it was made public so keep it that way.
-- Edited by SISGT on Friday 6th of April 2012 06:36:03 PM
FYI, how about this conspiracy theory.
Supposedly this Esposito chick (no relation to current Chief of Dept.) is the daughter of a former Chief on this job. She is going to die on the list as is. However, Kelly not wanting it to look like nepotism, couldn't outright extend the current list without raising eyebrows. So what happens? A test that is filled with factual errors, mistakes, etc is given, knowing full well the outcome will be a pending lawsuit, thus giving him a way to extend the list without it looking like nepotism, and thus allowing this former Chiefs daughter to be promoted, who otherwise would of died on the list.
Just saying..........................
-- Edited by Hs81 on Friday 6th of April 2012 06:54:43 PM
-- Edited by Jimmy McNulty on Friday 6th of April 2012 08:46:41 PM
-- Edited by Jimmy McNulty on Friday 6th of April 2012 08:59:19 PM
Im going to Injunct my fist in someones face.
-- Edited by HabidasheryAuto on Friday 6th of April 2012 09:59:52 PM
-- Edited by SISGT on Friday 6th of April 2012 09:59:34 PM
You still can join us!
Good luck.
What's interesting is that if you read the lawsuit she's actually one of the plaintiffs that signs at the very end.
LOL WOW I RECOGNIZE ATLEAST 3 OF THOSE NAMES ON THAT WEAK CRYBABY LAWSUIT...ALL 2006 REJECTS. Have a little bit of pride you zeros...your list numbers did not get called..should have studied a little harder on that kindergarden exam in 2006. Good luck anyway. lol. good for a laugh.
I love these one way C*nts from the 2006 list, suing on the basis that our 2011 test was unfair. What a crock of ****. Now will these 2006 cry babies go to work and say good morning to their peers who did pass the 2011 test and pretend to be friends. Bet you never thought youd be exposed!! "hey guys, I know i didnt take your exam and I know you passed, but I passed 5 years ago, so **** you Im suing, waaa waaa waaa. Im going to sue that YOUR test was UNFAIR, so that MY list will be extended." Doesnt get any more one way than that. Have fun looking at yourself in the mirror.
TAMAS BALATONI
JUAN BASTIDAS
GREGORY CASELLA
SUSAN DOWNING-KOHN
ALISON ESPOSITO
KEVIN FARRELL
PAUL FERRERA
RAMON FIALLO
GREGORY GREEN
JULIE GUTHOFF
ANTHONY LAFAUCI
WILLIAM MAHER
LOURDES MORALES
RAYMOND MORALES
RICHARD PORTO
EVELYN RIVERA
YVETTE VALENTIN
CONDRA WINSTON
MARSHALL WINSTON
Honestly I'm not even mad about the lawsuit it's more the language that upsets me. Their trying to get the 2011 LT exam thrown out KNOWING that Civil Service Law does not justify the extension of their list. That to me is so one way.
didnt the law firm originally want 100 petitioners at $250 a pop. you think these 19 desperate cry babies covered the rest?
That's a good question. Who knows and don't really care. Honestly I would love to see the list come out next week and promotions at the end of the month. That would be hilarious lol lol.
I would be shocked if an injunction is granted.
Lol
The best part is they are mostly 2006 list members, and their whole strategy is suing because OUR test was unfair. HOLY ****IN **** that infuriates me. So much for brotherhood. ****IN CUT THROAT BUSH LEAGUE PANZI'S!!!!
No. Unless we were going to wait that long anyway...
I think the department because of the lawsuit will probably wait to release the list after the May 1st court appearance.
Not sure cause dcas is also named in the lawsuit.
As of now, both entities can do whatever they want.
Lol
Will the mod please take down these names. Its not right to put our brother and sister Sgt's names on a public forum. We can have a cordial debate without it getting nasty.They made their names part of the PUBLIC forum when they filed a PUBLIC document. They can retract their petition or suck it up.
LMAO
Being a rat fcuking scumbag is never the answer to anything.
Hey if the lawsuit fails put in for IAB!! Within 2 months you will be promoted to SA!!! You earned it paying a lawyer to delay the 2011 list!!
If you are interested in taking part in this action Please e-mail me your contact information to justice4allpd@aol.com.