Was it just me or was the third question a tactic used by test makers to FFFF us all up?
I remember the question stating ot for 1 sgt. and 5 pos. but 2 sgt were rdo or something like that and two were on duty. The cops all ranged from conditions units to some patrol cops/other units. It seems the consesus is that monitering the OT was the key word. I tell you though that question took so much out of me i was catching up all day after that. I cant believe that question would not be thrown out. the directive was like 3-5 day before the telephone message came down and it never stated these cops could have been RDO.
18and1 said
Feb 5, 2012
I protested this question and feel it should be a double answer. I will be shocked if it isn't.
I remember the question stating ot for 1 sgt. and 5 pos. but 2 sgt were rdo or something like that and two were on duty. The cops all ranged from conditions units to some patrol cops/other units. It seems the consesus is that monitering the OT was the key word. I tell you though that question took so much out of me i was catching up all day after that. I cant believe that question would not be thrown out. the directive was like 3-5 day before the telephone message came down and it never stated these cops could have been RDO.