What was the answer to the question about the lt who had a sick prisoner, missing child , politician in the Pct. , meeting in two hours, what was the correct order and question #,
nycop80 said
Dec 24, 2011
Was prisoner , missing, politician , meeting
technocrat said
Dec 25, 2011
question # 9
BurnEd said
Dec 26, 2011
The lieutenant was supposed to first address the prisoner with chest pains even though a capable desk officer was leaving the desk. The lieutenant's second priority was to leave the command and lead the search for a 9 year-old missing. I contested the answer because according to the patrol guide a lieutenant must respond and lead the search for a missing under 10 years old. I felt the sergeant at the desk was fully capable of ensuring the prisoner with chest pains was properly attended to. It seemed like a judgement question. I still can't find anything in the patrol guide stating that this answer was incorrect.
technocrat said
Dec 26, 2011
I used the same premise to protest the question. There is nothing in the PG that says respond to sick prisoners 1st. PG however does stipulate the Lt does have a function with a 9 yr old missing.
DumbBrass said
Dec 26, 2011
Prisoner with chest pain in the holding pen should be priority as Desk Officer. Missing 9 years can be searched by P.S. or Det. if P.S./Plt. Cmdr. is not immediately available. Judgement question! Plt. Cmdr sends prisoner to hospital while leaving for search. Lt. didn't need to wait for Bus. I don't think that this question will be thrown out. Not to hurt anyone's feelings, Just a thought!
HB said
Dec 27, 2011
I am 100% sure that in the stem of the question it states that the prisoner was complaining of chest pains when the l.t. was on meal! So that means the DO at the time should have gotten him immediate medical attention as per the prisoner section of the pg. So the l.t. Technically speaking did not have to deal with this issue. It should have been dealt with while he was on meal. That my friend makes this a bad question and i can see it at least a double answer or a throw out all together.
oneadditional said
Dec 27, 2011
Should be tossed. Who wrote this dumb test ?
WANNABELT said
Dec 27, 2011
oneadditional wrote:
Should be tossed. Who wrote this dumb test ?
There are no dumb tests, only dumb people.
-- Edited by WANNABELT on Tuesday 27th of December 2011 10:05:44 PM
HB said
Dec 27, 2011
WANNABELT wrote:
oneadditional wrote:
Should be tossed. Who wrote this dumb test ?
There are no dumb tests, only dumb people.
-- Edited by WANNABELT on Tuesday 27th of December 2011 10:05:44 PM
Like your mother for not swallowing you...
TyWebb said
Dec 27, 2011
HB wrote:
WANNABELT wrote:
oneadditional wrote:
Should be tossed. Who wrote this dumb test ?
There are no dumb tests, only dumb people.
-- Edited by WANNABELT on Tuesday 27th of December 2011 10:05:44 PM
Like your mother for not swallowing you...
-- Edited by TyWebb on Tuesday 27th of December 2011 11:44:00 PM
BurnEd said
Dec 30, 2011
Interstate 77, that's wrong a 9 year old missing search must be led by the platoon commander or in his absence the duty captain.
DumbBrass said
Dec 30, 2011
Duty Captain supervises search for under 10 years old missing only if Platoon Commander is UNAVAILABLE. Two different thing: immediately not available or unavailable! In this question Platoon Commander was available!
-- Edited by DumbBrass on Saturday 31st of December 2011 12:04:38 AM
Rudy said
Jan 4, 2012
TyWebb, you still in viper with wannabelt? Oops my bad, you are the same person. Get the Lt coffee, suckboy
Gripes4Stripes said
Jan 7, 2012
BurnEd wrote:
The lieutenant was supposed to first address the prisoner with chest pains even though a capable desk officer was leaving the desk. The lieutenant's second priority was to leave the command and lead the search for a 9 year-old missing. I contested the answer because according to the patrol guide a lieutenant must respond and lead the search for a missing under 10 years old. I felt the sergeant at the desk was fully capable of ensuring the prisoner with chest pains was properly attended to. It seemed like a judgement question. I still can't find anything in the patrol guide stating that this answer was incorrect.
me too!!
Rudy said
Jan 15, 2012
TyWebb wrote:
HB wrote:
WANNABELT wrote:
oneadditional wrote:
Should be tossed. Who wrote this dumb test ?
There are no dumb tests, only dumb people.
-- Edited by WANNABELT on Tuesday 27th of December 2011 10:05:44 PM
Like your mother for not swallowing you...
-- Edited by TyWebb on Tuesday 27th of December 2011 11:44:00 PM
I think Ty webb needs a hud, wussy he is. go back to your sat & sun off office boy. By the way the Lt. wants light and sweet.
The lieutenant was supposed to first address the prisoner with chest pains even though a capable desk officer was leaving the desk. The lieutenant's second priority was to leave the command and lead the search for a 9 year-old missing. I contested the answer because according to the patrol guide a lieutenant must respond and lead the search for a missing under 10 years old. I felt the sergeant at the desk was fully capable of ensuring the prisoner with chest pains was properly attended to. It seemed like a judgement question. I still can't find anything in the patrol guide stating that this answer was incorrect.
There are no dumb tests, only dumb people.
-- Edited by WANNABELT on Tuesday 27th of December 2011 10:05:44 PM
-- Edited by TyWebb on Tuesday 27th of December 2011 11:44:00 PM
Interstate 77, that's wrong a 9 year old missing search must be led by the platoon commander or in his absence the duty captain.
Duty Captain supervises search for under 10 years old missing only if Platoon Commander is UNAVAILABLE. Two different thing: immediately not available or unavailable! In this question Platoon Commander was available!
-- Edited by DumbBrass on Saturday 31st of December 2011 12:04:38 AM
me too!!
I think Ty webb needs a hud, wussy he is. go back to your sat & sun off office boy. By the way the Lt. wants light and sweet.