-- Edited by Huyova on Tuesday 25th of October 2011 09:26:33 PM
gotabimer said
Oct 24, 2011
Remain alert memobook entrys no arguing here my brother dont know why you even ask..
fedup said
Oct 24, 2011
this was a ****ed up question, i had for the off duty to produce his id but people here are saying that is wrong. choice b sounded retarded immediatley make an activity log entry while your holding the guy at gun point? only this department would make that the right answer
CryTwoSeven said
Oct 24, 2011
Yes I think B was Expedicously choice which was wrong. Gotta think tactics. You don't want someone going into their pockets fast and without delay. It suppose to say SLOWLY. answer was to make the AL entries. I remember the key specifically saying that they love tactical questions regarding this procedure. And to me it was groundball
gotabimer said
Oct 24, 2011
Its b there is no ands and buts i read it straight out the key package from a small chart...
CryTwoSeven said
Oct 24, 2011
The answer neVer said "while you holding him at gunpoint" it was something like "once you are satisfied make a AL entry"
CryTwoSeven said
Oct 24, 2011
STEP 7
7. Produce identification slowly, in a controlled manner, without unnecessary movement.
Then STEP 10 11
10. Return credentials, if satisfied with identification. 11. Make ACTIVITY LOG (PD112-145) entry.
gotabimer said
Oct 24, 2011
There you go there was no automatically on that anwer where in the world did you get automatically from...memobook is the answer no buts and ands
-- Edited by gotabimer on Monday 24th of October 2011 04:48:49 PM
fedup said
Oct 24, 2011
in this day and age with fake shields and id cards im supposed to just say weeeeel ok there buddy your a ****ing sheriffs deputy in bum **** idaho now let me just holster up and make an activity log entry... about what who know? also let me make sure my 8 point cap is squarely secured on my head and im carrying my traffic whistle. total non sensical question a good quesiton wouldve been take cover to the rear not the side
zknight said
Oct 24, 2011
it states "if satisfied" return id (states nothing of shield. remember shield means ****). If you are not satisfied its a cop then its a perp and you would cuff him up for your safety and his.
ten84 said
Oct 25, 2011
dumb question, we need to protest it
CaballoRage3000 said
Oct 25, 2011
yeah I messed that one up. Easy point I gave away
MamaBear said
Oct 25, 2011
CaballoRage3000 wrote:
yeah I messed that one up. Easy point I gave away
Yea, me too... I was thinking Y in God's name am I making an entry... I got caught mentally...
DatnoidS said
Oct 26, 2011
same here.. it wasnt specific.. i guessed i read into it too much.. do u think it can be protested on the fact that,
E D said
Oct 26, 2011
You can't protest questions based on the fact that you are a moron and can't read.
gotabimer said
Oct 26, 2011
Dude there is no protesting crap this question is straight foward i read it in the key package in a small chart..Its clear and simple
E D said
Oct 26, 2011
People are gonna be seriously disappointed, they dont just throw away questions because you idiots can't understand the questions. You are lucky if you get 1 or 2 double answers.
BluKnight said
Oct 27, 2011
Who was the actor in this question? What was wrong with the option have
supervisors respond and go to the command?
-- Edited by BluKnight on Thursday 27th of October 2011 06:31:48 PM
Devil Dog said
Oct 27, 2011
The PO was off duty!! Thats why you don't have his supervisor respond.
gotabimer said
Oct 28, 2011
Dude when everybody goes to the co office is when it happens inside the command dag read the patrolguide stop asking bullcrap questions goshhh,,,when is an outside department law enforsement everybody 10-2,media 10-2
-- Edited by gotabimer on Friday 28th of October 2011 01:44:47 AM
-- Edited by gotabimer on Friday 28th of October 2011 01:46:02 AM
letsssss gooooo said
Oct 28, 2011
read the PG kid
Al25001 said
Oct 30, 2011
That question could be challenge because of the wording scenario, they put the officer taking police action. So if something goes wrong and the officer get injured that will e LOD. So this is disputable .
bigfoot45 said
Oct 30, 2011
This was a simple question if you knew the procedure. This is not
*eidt*
-- Edited by Huyova on Tuesday 25th of October 2011 09:26:33 PM
this was a ****ed up question, i had for the off duty to produce his id but people here are saying that is wrong. choice b sounded retarded immediatley make an activity log entry while your holding the guy at gun point? only this department would make that the right answer
7. Produce identification slowly, in a controlled manner, without unnecessary movement.
Then STEP 10 11
10. Return credentials, if satisfied with identification.
11. Make ACTIVITY LOG (PD112-145) entry.
-- Edited by gotabimer on Monday 24th of October 2011 04:48:49 PM
in this day and age with fake shields and id cards im supposed to just say weeeeel ok there buddy your a ****ing sheriffs deputy in bum **** idaho now let me just holster up and make an activity log entry... about what who know? also let me make sure my 8 point cap is squarely secured on my head and im carrying my traffic whistle. total non sensical question a good quesiton wouldve been take cover to the rear not the side
it states "if satisfied" return id (states nothing of shield. remember shield means ****). If you are not satisfied its a cop then its a perp and you would cuff him up for your safety and his.
dumb question, we need to protest it
Yea, me too... I was thinking Y in God's name am I making an entry... I got caught mentally...
Who was the actor in this question? What was wrong with the option have
supervisors respond and go to the command?
-- Edited by BluKnight on Thursday 27th of October 2011 06:31:48 PM
-- Edited by gotabimer on Friday 28th of October 2011 01:44:47 AM
-- Edited by gotabimer on Friday 28th of October 2011 01:46:02 AM
This was a simple question if you knew the procedure. This is not
getting thrown out. There is not a double answer.