OLBS AND 250, what's the other one ? olbs by itself ?
The other choice was just UF250.
Severin said
Apr 5, 2017
The answer was the Gla its a sub of grand larceny which is a family offense...went to the protest and got it wrong
fighten0h said
Apr 5, 2017
Isn't assault 2 up there ? And how did praying for a pass do v
Arrow said
Apr 5, 2017
he's probably out celebrating. good for him if he passed.
Sunrise said
Apr 5, 2017
Isn't that assault 1? That's why I didnt pick it. That's not a family offense.
TenFour16 said
Apr 5, 2017
I just read Penal Law on Assault 1. It matches exactly what the cousin did. It is not Assault 2, it spells out Assault 1.
"With intent to cause SPI to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person by means of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument.".
Sounds clear to me. The correct answer at the PRS said he "intended" to cause SPI.
This was my only hope to get that 1 point I need. Not getting it.
Queens Finest said
Apr 5, 2017
........
-- Edited by Queens Finest on Thursday 13th of April 2017 03:03:40 AM
MBREEZE said
Apr 5, 2017
I GO ON THE 18TH BUT I'M HEARING THAT THEY ARE SAYING THE COUSIN WITH THE BAT IS WRONG BECAUSE ITS ASSAULT 1. IT HAS TO BE ASSAULT 2 OR 3 IN ORDER TO FIT THE FAMILY OFFENSE. THE ANSWER STATED THAT HE INTENDED TO BREAK THE ARM AND ACTUALLY BROKE THE ARM. THAT WOULD MAKE IT AN ASSAULT 1. I CHOSE THE COUSINS AS WELL.
MBREEZE said
Apr 5, 2017
fighten0h wrote:
How is it not the cousin with the bat ?
SORRY I MEANT TO RESPOND TO THIS....
I GO ON THE 18TH BUT I'M HEARING THAT THEY ARE SAYING THE COUSIN WITH THE BAT IS WRONG BECAUSE ITS ASSAULT 1. IT HAS TO BE ASSAULT 2 OR 3 IN ORDER TO FIT THE FAMILY OFFENSE. THE ANSWER STATED THAT HE INTENDED TO BREAK THE ARM AND ACTUALLY BROKE THE ARM. THAT WOULD MAKE IT AN ASSAULT 1. I CHOSE THE COUSINS AS WELL.
TenFour16 said
Apr 5, 2017
The only way I can see the family question being thrown out is if it has no correct answer. They had the answer as Grand Larceny. I realized im beating myself up over my choice when I realized that it can still be fought because how exactly is it Grand Larceny and not unauthorized use ?
Reality is, I need 1 point and im trying to hold on to false hope when I shouldnt. But what the hell .......
TenFour16 said
Apr 5, 2017
Grand Larceny 4th is what they had as the answer. Everything was a blurr at the PRS for me, but did it say he "STOLE" the vehicle ? Didnt is also say he said he isnt giving it back ?
Looked up Penal Law now.
It says:
S 165.05 Unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree.
A person is guilty of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third
degree when:
1. Knowing that he does not have the consent of the owner, he takes,
operates, exercises control over, rides in or otherwise uses a vehicle.
A person who engages in any such conduct without the consent of the
owner is presumed to know that he does not have such consent; or
2. Having custody of a vehicle pursuant to an agreement between
himself or another and the owner thereof whereby he or another is to
perform for compensation a specific service for the owner involving the
maintenance, repair or use of such vehicle, he intentionally uses or
operates the same, without the consent of the owner, for his own
purposes in a manner constituting a gross deviation from the agreed
purpose; or
3. Having custody of a vehicle pursuant to an agreement with the owner
thereof whereby such vehicle is to be returned to the owner at a
specified time, he intentionally retains or withholds possession
thereof, without the consent of the owner, for so lengthy a period
beyond the specified time as to render such retention or possession a
gross deviation from the agreement.
For purposes of this section "a gross deviation from the agreement"
shall consist of, but not be limited to, circumstances wherein a person
who having had custody of a vehicle for a period of fifteen days or less
pursuant to a written agreement retains possession of such vehicle for
at least seven days beyond the period specified in the agreement and
continues such possession for a period of more than two days after
service or refusal of attempted service of a notice in person or by
certified mail at an address indicated in the agreement stating (i) the
date and time at which the vehicle was to have been returned under the
agreement; (ii) that the owner does not consent to the continued
withholding or retaining of such vehicle and demands its return; and
that continued withholding or retaining of the vehicle may constitute a
class A misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to one thousand dollars
or by a sentence to a term of imprisonment for a period of up to one
year or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree is a class A misdemeanor.
TenFour16 said
Apr 5, 2017
Guys, the cousin with the bat is Assault 1. We are losing that battle. For those fighting this question, our only hope is fighting that there is NO CORRECT answer. What the boyfriend did sounds like Unauthorized use.
goose-eggs said
Apr 5, 2017
should we start a search party for prayingforapass70?
NJohn33 said
Apr 5, 2017
We should.. please notify his residence Pct..
Sunrise said
Apr 5, 2017
I picked the Grand Larceny, but honestly, I did feel like it could Unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.
Queens Finest said
Apr 5, 2017
.......
-- Edited by Queens Finest on Thursday 13th of April 2017 02:58:53 AM
Just out of curiosity do we know of passers both at Brooklyn and Manhattan I'm extremely nervous .
UrinalFly said
Apr 5, 2017
Sunrise wrote:
I picked the Grand Larceny, but honestly, I did feel like it could Unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.
That's what I thought of as well.
Sunrise said
Apr 5, 2017
Queens Finest wrote:
The crime reporting reference guide goes into the whole GLA/UUV. I have not attended the PRS yet but wasn't the answer similar to last bullet on the attached image?
Yup!
TenFour16 said
Apr 5, 2017
Queens Finest, the last one looks exactly like the correct choice they had.
There goes my protest.
Thanks for that post though, its basically identical to what they had.
Queens Finest said
Apr 5, 2017
...
-- Edited by Queens Finest on Sunday 16th of April 2017 01:49:17 PM
TenFour16 said
Apr 5, 2017
Wait a minute, but didnt they have the answer as Grand Larceny 4th ?
Sunrise said
Apr 5, 2017
@tenfour is there anything else that you got wrong that ppl have protested or are going to protest? You might still have a shot.
TenFour16 said
Apr 5, 2017
They had the answer as GL 4th degree. The reference guide you show has GLA.
GLA was not any if the choices
Queens Finest said
Apr 5, 2017
Yes, but GLA is technically GL 4. I believe it's subdivision 8. The value of the vehicle was 10k so its actually GL 3. Still a family offense though.
Sunrise said
Apr 5, 2017
Hmm. GLA 4th is a family offense, but the reference guide does say GLA; which isn't a family offense.
Sunrise said
Apr 5, 2017
Queens Finest wrote:
Yes, but GLA is technically GL 4. I believe it's subdivision 8. The value of the vehicle was 10k so its actually GL 3. Still a family offense though.
True
TenFour16 said
Apr 5, 2017
Even if it was GL 3, it wasnt a choice. Wouldnt that make it a throwout ?
Lol ...... I need to get over it. Hanging on to whatever hope I have.
At least its debateable ... worth a shot.
jetsetter said
Apr 5, 2017
The response read "A woman's Honda civic was stolen from the front of her house. Her ex-boyfriend calls her and says he has it and is not giving it back" No where does it say he stole the vehicle--- some crack head could have stolen it and now he Criminally Posses the Stolen Property, but it does not say he committed the Grand Larceny. So I think there is no correct answer.
making dcas great again said
Apr 5, 2017
Does anyone know the answer to the map question did it get thrown out ?
TenFour16 said
Apr 5, 2017
Jetsetter brings up a good point.
Seems to be various ways to fight this one.
Caralho said
Apr 5, 2017
cop wrote:
Just out of curiosity do we know of passers both at Brooklyn and Manhattan I'm extremely nervous .
Where are u going ?
Caralho said
Apr 5, 2017
prayingforapass70 Where are u buddy? How was the protest?
making dcas great again said
Apr 6, 2017
prayingforapass70 we need some updates MIA
Sunrise said
Apr 6, 2017
Maybe. Try it! You never know. You might get that point that you need.
Supervisorhopeful said
Apr 6, 2017
This board isnt the same without prayingforapass. Bring him back!!!
UrinalFly said
Apr 6, 2017
Someone call a level 1.
Artiemac said
Apr 6, 2017
Dude .. if you steal something and refuse to give it back and it's worth more than a thousand it's a grand larceny .. get over this dam question . Most of us got it wrong focus on things that aren't word for word proven already .
Sunrise said
Apr 6, 2017
Prayingforapass70- where are you?
fighten0h said
Apr 6, 2017
I'm semi concerned
yougonow said
Apr 6, 2017
Where's prayingforapass?
NYPD1287 said
Apr 6, 2017
Bellevue would probably be the first place to check
My Friend got the Map question wrong, I did not see it on my screen but I picked the longer selection.
making dcas great again said
Apr 6, 2017
nyfine you got the map question right ? I pick the short route but my protest date is 4/12 I am wondering what's the correct answer for the map question
BLASTboys said
Apr 6, 2017
parayingforapass on the air?
BlastLivesMatter said
Apr 6, 2017
TenFour16 wrote:
I fell one point short. Just 1.
I got the burg question wrong (commercial vehicle) and the family question wrong. I chose the cousin who hit the other cousin with the bat. Does anyone believe either one of these is a throw out ?
Did they throw out the "Which is the Most Answer" question? If not yet then you're sure to pick up that 1 extra point
Nyfine said
Apr 6, 2017
making dcas great again wrote:
nyfine you got the map question right ? I pick the short route but my protest date is 4/12 I am wondering what's the correct answer for the map question
The map question wasn't on my screen.
NauseousPBBN said
Apr 6, 2017
guy from my precinct said that the First question wasnt Nyugen and Allen for shooting auto, can anyone else confirm?
Arrow said
Apr 6, 2017
those were the only 2 that you could put because turner was the only option and turner got denied the tour change.
The other choice was just UF250.
The answer was the Gla its a sub of grand larceny which is a family offense...went to the protest and got it wrong
he's probably out celebrating. good for him if he passed.
Isn't that assault 1? That's why I didnt pick it. That's not a family offense.
"With intent to cause SPI to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person by means of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument.".
Sounds clear to me. The correct answer at the PRS said he "intended" to cause SPI.
This was my only hope to get that 1 point I need. Not getting it.
........
-- Edited by Queens Finest on Thursday 13th of April 2017 03:03:40 AM
I GO ON THE 18TH BUT I'M HEARING THAT THEY ARE SAYING THE COUSIN WITH THE BAT IS WRONG BECAUSE ITS ASSAULT 1. IT HAS TO BE ASSAULT 2 OR 3 IN ORDER TO FIT THE FAMILY OFFENSE. THE ANSWER STATED THAT HE INTENDED TO BREAK THE ARM AND ACTUALLY BROKE THE ARM. THAT WOULD MAKE IT AN ASSAULT 1. I CHOSE THE COUSINS AS WELL.
SORRY I MEANT TO RESPOND TO THIS....
I GO ON THE 18TH BUT I'M HEARING THAT THEY ARE SAYING THE COUSIN WITH THE BAT IS WRONG BECAUSE ITS ASSAULT 1. IT HAS TO BE ASSAULT 2 OR 3 IN ORDER TO FIT THE FAMILY OFFENSE. THE ANSWER STATED THAT HE INTENDED TO BREAK THE ARM AND ACTUALLY BROKE THE ARM. THAT WOULD MAKE IT AN ASSAULT 1. I CHOSE THE COUSINS AS WELL.
Reality is, I need 1 point and im trying to hold on to false hope when I shouldnt. But what the hell .......
Looked up Penal Law now.
It says:
S 165.05 Unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree.
A person is guilty of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third
degree when:
1. Knowing that he does not have the consent of the owner, he takes,
operates, exercises control over, rides in or otherwise uses a vehicle.
A person who engages in any such conduct without the consent of the
owner is presumed to know that he does not have such consent; or
2. Having custody of a vehicle pursuant to an agreement between
himself or another and the owner thereof whereby he or another is to
perform for compensation a specific service for the owner involving the
maintenance, repair or use of such vehicle, he intentionally uses or
operates the same, without the consent of the owner, for his own
purposes in a manner constituting a gross deviation from the agreed
purpose; or
3. Having custody of a vehicle pursuant to an agreement with the owner
thereof whereby such vehicle is to be returned to the owner at a
specified time, he intentionally retains or withholds possession
thereof, without the consent of the owner, for so lengthy a period
beyond the specified time as to render such retention or possession a
gross deviation from the agreement.
For purposes of this section "a gross deviation from the agreement"
shall consist of, but not be limited to, circumstances wherein a person
who having had custody of a vehicle for a period of fifteen days or less
pursuant to a written agreement retains possession of such vehicle for
at least seven days beyond the period specified in the agreement and
continues such possession for a period of more than two days after
service or refusal of attempted service of a notice in person or by
certified mail at an address indicated in the agreement stating (i) the
date and time at which the vehicle was to have been returned under the
agreement; (ii) that the owner does not consent to the continued
withholding or retaining of such vehicle and demands its return; and
that continued withholding or retaining of the vehicle may constitute a
class A misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to one thousand dollars
or by a sentence to a term of imprisonment for a period of up to one
year or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree is a class A misdemeanor.
.......
-- Edited by Queens Finest on Thursday 13th of April 2017 02:58:53 AM
Just out of curiosity do we know of passers both at Brooklyn and Manhattan I'm extremely nervous .
That's what I thought of as well.
Yup!
There goes my protest.
Thanks for that post though, its basically identical to what they had.
...
-- Edited by Queens Finest on Sunday 16th of April 2017 01:49:17 PM
GLA was not any if the choices
True
Lol ...... I need to get over it. Hanging on to whatever hope I have.
At least its debateable ... worth a shot.
Does anyone know the answer to the map question did it get thrown out ?
Seems to be various ways to fight this one.
Where are u going ?
prayingforapass70 we need some updates MIA
Maybe. Try it! You never know. You might get that point that you need.
This board isnt the same without prayingforapass. Bring him back!!!
Hmmm
nyfine you got the map question right ? I pick the short route but my protest date is 4/12 I am wondering what's the correct answer for the map question
Did they throw out the "Which is the Most Answer" question? If not yet then you're sure to pick up that 1 extra point
The map question wasn't on my screen.
those were the only 2 that you could put because turner was the only option and turner got denied the tour change.