Supposedly its 3 because the guy with aids already had it listed on the movement slip and you don't list it twice . I dropped that one. Do you remember the dept. veh accident question with cops from another command. I picked that the patrol Supervisor preprEs a par x4 but inheard the answer is the p/s determines if a summons should be issued to a civilian operator

I don't remember what I chose lol but I think I dropped that one.....anybody send 3 cops to the transport???

Wait how is it 3 for the medical treatment? I thought it was 2, the guy who went to the hospital and the guy who asked to go, but then RMA'd.

For the transport you had to send 3 cops because it was more than 2 prisoners without chains.

-- Edited by Thebirds on Sunday 26th of February 2017 11:48:25 PM

Patrol Guide for medical Treatment says do one for someone who requests then refuses ..also says denote communicable disease on either movement slip or medical treatment . 3 cops to transport for sure
also says do one for someone who may require medication 

Where was this note ? Don't tell me it was on the rmp sheet . Car stop with the firearm ? That was good to go .. housing stop ? Unverified Caller ? No other reason
To stop ? No good

Finest7578 wrote:

---

Where was this note ? Don't tell me it was on the rmp sheet . Car stop with the firearm ? That was good to go .. housing stop ? Unverified Caller ? No other reason
To stop ? No good

-- Edited by Finest7578 on Monday 27th of February 2017 12:04:04 AM

---

 I'm vaguely remembering that question, but the housing stop answer I picked was to question and he had the right to leave although you aren't obligated to inform him of that. Didn't it have something about seeing a bulge that appeared to be a weapon or am I mixing up 2 questions?

Finest7578 wrote:

---

Where was this note ? Don't tell me it was on the rmp sheet . Car stop with the firearm ? That was good to go .. housing stop ? Unverified Caller ? No other reason
To stop ? No good

-- Edited by Finest7578 on Monday 27th of February 2017 12:04:04 AM

---

 it was a memo hope also caught that one of the tour changes got canceled and one if the cops came back full duty 

Grammar question I was stuck then I saw principal was misspelled 

Sounds like you guys had a tough fair exam.  Just so you know, a question won't get thrown out because of poor wording or even missing a word.  The answer you picked has to be as good or better.  If the question has completely no right answer, then it could be a throw out.  

Bigfoot is right. 

-- Edited by SonsOfXavier1997 on Monday 27th of February 2017 12:30:30 AM

Nyfine wrote:

---

Yes they were on Elite fb going on and on until he erased ppl posts putting questions up. There was a note that one of the Vans were to transport prisoners and the van was equipped with Chains!!!! Also they made the aided 66 and said the guy that hit him it was his 55th bday making him exactly over 10 years younger causing it to be Assault 2. Both those questions & answers had me upset! Lol

---

 The preliminary information stated the precinct's only set of transport chains were lost. The answer for the transport is definitely 3 cops.

@ no63foryou.....someone told me Dcas was trying to suck you into a trap in choosing to wait for the ID but the answer was to put the person through

wow, i put 4. i was so caught up in the damn in basket that didnt even notice that it mentioned that a movement slip was done else where in the in basket cuz the question didnt mentioned any movement slip.

Finest7578 wrote:

---

Patrol Guide for medical Treatment says do one for someone who requests then refuses ..also says denote communicable disease on either movement slip or medical treatment . 3 cops to transport for sure
also says do one for someone who may require medication 

-- Edited by Finest7578 on Sunday 26th of February 2017 11:53:05 PM

---

 It actually states on a medical treatment form if not on a movemoment slip. I don't recall a movement slip. I only recalled seeing a Pedigree Card. Also you needed one for the guy who needed prescribed medication (asthma guy with pump)

What about the forms.. I listed stop report and lobs worksheet as correct since the 61 had the wrong jurisdiction 

oh yeah now i remember that damn slip in there  wow. thats another wrong. no way I'm making it

nypd2010 wrote:

---

What about the forms.. I listed stop report and lobs worksheet as correct since the 61 had the wrong jurisdiction 

---

 Same

nypd2010 wrote:

---

Will be protesting the question regarding confrontations. Based on the choices there were none that were verbatum from the PG. One choice said to have the cop take out his ID in a controlled manner (never specified slow) which is a point they went to on the last exam also the other apparently "correct" answer said for the cop to holster his firearm and put his hands in the air. i dont have the PG near me right now but i checked and there is no statement about holstering a firearm. it merely says while doing admin work in civ. attire, wear shield near holster but make an attempt to move shield near chest area when taking enforcement action 

Also, the 207 question regarding notifying IAB, it was the officers on scene right?

fire question- supervisor I chose advise FDNY incident commander of the number of mos in the building but i heard a few people say it was proceed immediately to the incident command post

---

 For the (2) fire questions, one is for the Sgt to report to the incident command post, and the other was for the sector (second sector on scene) to account for the UMOS's.

DeezNutz wrote:

---

nypd2010 wrote:

---

Will be protesting the question regarding confrontations. Based on the choices there were none that were verbatum from the PG. One choice said to have the cop take out his ID in a controlled manner (never specified slow) which is a point they went to on the last exam also the other apparently "correct" answer said for the cop to holster his firearm and put his hands in the air. i dont have the PG near me right now but i checked and there is no statement about holstering a firearm. it merely says while doing admin work in civ. attire, wear shield near holster but make an attempt to move shield near chest area when taking enforcement action 

Also, the 207 question regarding notifying IAB, it was the officers on scene right?

fire question- supervisor I chose advise FDNY incident commander of the number of mos in the building but i heard a few people say it was proceed immediately to the incident command post

---

 For the (2) fire questions, one is for the Sgt to report to the incident command post, and the other was for the sector (second sector on scene) to account for the UMOS's.

-- Edited by DeezNutz on Monday 27th of February 2017 12:52:50 AM

---

 I addressed this already, look at my post on the question. They got a lot of people on that sergeant fire question because they didn't take into account that he was the second sergeant on scene. 

wowwww @ nauseous a lot of ppl told me I was wrong when I chose delay arrest processing....209-38 step 12 states that desk officer is to allow the person time to get ID if they can get DAT or Summons.......I was thinkin what I would do if I was on the desk.....in ADDITION to that the city council and everyone else is on our TAILS when it comes to weed....they basically want us to get rid of them asap IF they don't have a warrant but a lot of people told me I was wrong and it was to put them thru

prayingforapass70 wrote:

---

yea the movement slip was weird as hell.....I really think they did this in basket with their eyes closed....soooo many sneaky things

---

 This in basket really got me good. Who ever wrote that in basket really had a lot of free time on his hands. It was very challenging. I just smile when some guys say that the exam was straight forward. And I tell them you either didn't study and just took the exam or took a different one 

The time was certainly taken to make it tricky.  However, it seems the time was also taken to ensure their was a comprehensible correct question.

nypd2010 wrote:

---

What about the forms.. I listed stop report and lobs worksheet as correct since the 61 had the wrong jurisdiction 

---

 The 61 was bad period. No 61 for Crim Tres 3.

bigfoot45 wrote:

---

The time was certainly taken to make it tricky.  However, it seems the time was also taken to ensure their was a comprehensible correct question.

---

 You're correct Bigfoot. Those questions were on another level. Don't get me wrong hey were a few straight forward question, but wow. 

It's actually a good thing to have an exam like that.  Those that really put the time in will pass.  Those that didn't will fall a little short.  

bigfoot45 wrote:

---

It's actually a good thing to have an exam like that.  Those that really put the time in will pass.  Those that didn't will fall a little short.  

---

 I don't really get this attitude. If you put more time in you do better and get a higher list number. Why would I wish for more people to fail? If the test is "too easy" the list will get cut anyway.

DeezNutz wrote:

---

Anyone who did not have a question with a female that suffered a broken leg caused by an MOS using force?

---

 It was a broken ankle.

Myself and 2 other people I know of did not have that question.

nypd2010 wrote:

---

Will be protesting the question regarding confrontations. Based on the choices there were none that were verbatum from the PG. One choice said to have the cop take out his ID in a controlled manner (never specified slow) which is a point they went to on the last exam also the other apparently "correct" answer said for the cop to holster his firearm and put his hands in the air. i dont have the PG near me right now but i checked and there is no statement about holstering a firearm. it merely says while doing admin work in civ. attire, wear shield near holster but make an attempt to move shield near chest area when taking enforcement action 

Also, the 207 question regarding notifying IAB, it was the officers on scene right?

fire question- supervisor I chose advise FDNY incident commander of the number of mos in the building but i heard a few people say it was proceed immediately to the incident command post

---

 Holstering and putting hands in the air is wrong bc the PG specifically states to remain motionless

prayingforapass70 wrote:

---

yea I def got that wrong I thought it was the sgt one just cuz they didn't state WHO pushed the lady. IN the question it only stated the officers moved ppl along...but o well

---

@ 3rd time the charm yes it says remain motionless