guys relax, from what I understand the end game of this lawsuit is not to get the test thrown out. I think their main objective is to get the test curved from 65 and up to be passers, or at least have a fair analysis of the questions submitted for changes.... And we all know that what ever debacle occurred at the TVB it was absolutely not a fair analysis of the questions submitted for changes.
Su Madre 24 said
Mar 25, 2016
Sarge wrote:
guys relax, from what I understand the end game of this lawsuit is not to get the test thrown out. I think their main objective is to get the test curved from 65 and up to be passers, or at least have a fair analysis of the questions submitted for changes.... And we all know that what ever debacle occurred at the TVB it was absolutely not a fair analysis of the questions submitted for changes.
That is def their main goal. Get it curved or a new TVB
IShredMajors said
Mar 25, 2016
I think they would throw out the list before they curve it.
Su Madre 24 said
Mar 25, 2016
IShredMajors wrote:
I think they would throw out the list before they curve it.
Sweet f*cking Christ, if that occurs: all hell well break loose
-- Edited by Su Madre 24 on Friday 25th of March 2016 10:38:44 PM
ltexm2015 said
Mar 25, 2016
I want every smart man and women from the elite to breathe. I want you to think. I want you to rationalize and break this all down. 1- a federal judge will either grant or deny an in juncture monday. The job has ZERO choice but to cancel promotions bc if the in juncture is granted...then it's safer to cancel promotions on a Thursday rather then scramble on a Monday at 1800. 2- break down the arguements presented. Loud noise?? Oh I'm sorry guess the whole world should stop on a spring April day so you can pass a test. Proctor leaving and bathroom talking??? Really?? I hope the sgt who saw that made an immediate IAB notification for corruption. Answer key being posted? If someone took a picture of they key that would be an individual problem not relating to anything to do w any test taker. Finally the questions...shame on you if you provided questions to any future test taker. Ppl talking about questions will never change....what needs to change is the administering of future tests. All stuff that concludes no one I can see who went out of their way to cheat. Any at test taker where there's proof he saught out questions should be dealt w swiftly. This will all come out ...you're hearing a one sided story by a bunch of sgts who are feeding the media what they want to hear.
-- Edited by ltexm2015 on Friday 25th of March 2016 11:42:33 AM
ondeeair2321 said
Mar 25, 2016
ur forgetting one thing. that the city cares abut 200 people who passed. i hate to inform you---they dont. u are a cog in a system---relax and wait for what comes. also that you have much power to react. you dont. welcome to the job. this isnt going away i can tell you that
Transitblows said
Mar 25, 2016
Should we add that to the list of crap you "guaranteed" or "confirmed" over the past year
ondeeair2321 said
Mar 25, 2016
I'm on no ones side. I'm over this. Done. It will just be a long road now for everyone. For the makeup guys, who attempted to take the short road--they forced all onto the long one. Good luck to all.
Samiam32 said
Mar 25, 2016
Curving the list is not going to happen. Only two options I see (1) Throw out the whole exam and start from scratch or (2) Everyone makes the list and the people at the bottom just die on the list like in the past.
Devil Dog said
Mar 25, 2016
Samiam32 wrote:
Curving the list is not going to happen. Only two options I see (1) Throw out the whole exam and start from scratch or (2) Everyone makes the list and the people at the bottom just die on the list like in the past.
City won't negotiate like that. I'd bet if an injunction is granted, they toss it. Which will result in a huge lawsuit vs the city and the lying sgts. Or if no injunction they'll promote and investigate some alleged cheaters.
-- Edited by Devil Dog on Friday 25th of March 2016 01:19:15 PM
Samiam32 said
Mar 25, 2016
This is not going away that easily. Either way the city turns there's going to be a lawsuit. If they toss the list the original 164 passers have a case. If they keep the list those that failed have a case. Then those that get passed over by an alternate test taker have a case. Too many people got hurt this time around. Promotion to Lt is a big step career wise.
IShredMajors said
Mar 25, 2016
Samiam32 wrote:
Curving the list is not going to happen. Only two options I see (1) Throw out the whole exam and start from scratch or (2) Everyone makes the list and the people at the bottom just die on the list like in the past.
These are the only 2 scenarios I see happening. They would scrap it before they curved it.
Also, I read the court complaint. It only has cheating allegations in it. Nothing in there about bad TVB or 70 passing is too hard or anything like that. Cheating allegations don't make failures into passers.
A link to the court complaint for those interested. There's a lot of cry baby bullsh*t in there.
-- Edited by IShredMajors on Friday 25th of March 2016 01:36:31 PM
70please said
Mar 25, 2016
I'm in as well ... I believe all the passers will be willing to put money towards legal proceedings... However finding good counsel will be the challenge ... Just based on a Sba lawyer who is also a sgt that closed on my house ...... Probably not getting anywhere fruitful with the Sba
Devil Dog said
Mar 25, 2016
70please wrote:
I'm in as well ... I believe all the passers will be willing to put money towards legal proceedings... However finding good counsel will be the challenge ... Just based on a Sba lawyer who is also a sgt that closed on my house ...... Probably not getting anywhere fruitful with the Sba
We wont need the SBA. I'll bet we get a 100 people easy, which would be a substancial amount of resources.
papote170 said
Mar 25, 2016
I say,, we should start getting together and really start looking at different law firms because I get the feeling this is about to get ugly.. those of us who passed the exam on the initial day of the exam should STRONGLY consider joining forces. all the time away from your family / kids ,,the hours spent at the library studying ur butts off in order to pass this debacle of exam.. and now we have to deal with this B.S of the possibility of the list being thrown out ! .. There is no justification on why those of us who took the exam on the initial day shouldn't get promoted ...if the issue is how the "scammers" made their way into the list ! .. let's just pass them over for promotions until it is investigated !! .. I'm pretty sure nobody would have an issue with that !..
PROVE IT said
Mar 25, 2016
the only people who should of had a say were the original passers...the cheaters only bumped them down the list... the scammers didn't effect any of the original failures and now 9 crybaby failures are exaggerating and are claiming rampant cheating....i hope nothing comes out of this but a small delay and a hefty bill for those newest 9 scammers.
Devil Dog said
Mar 25, 2016
papote170 wrote:
I say,, we should start getting together and really start looking at different law firms because I get the feeling this is about to get ugly.. those of us who passed the exam on the initial day of the exam should STRONGLY consider joining forces. all the time away from your family / kids ,,the hours spent at the library studying ur butts off in order to pass this debacle of exam.. and now we have to deal with this B.S of the possibility of the list being thrown out ! .. There is no justification on why those of us who took the exam on the initial day shouldn't get promoted ...if the issue is how the "scammers" made their way into the list ! .. let's just pass them over for promotions until it is investigated !! .. I'm pretty sure nobody would have an issue with that !..
yep. We should also seek an injuction to stop any future LTs test until the original passers have been promoted ( if not jammed etc.). Let's take a deep breath and see where we are Monday. Will be easy to get a cpl of us to make calls and meet up for sit downs.
-- Edited by Devil Dog on Friday 25th of March 2016 02:02:02 PM
PROVE IT said
Mar 25, 2016
Papote, I agree..... I can see them promoting all of the original passers and delaying the scammers or even dismissing the from promotion... But their just isn't any justification to throw out a list that has 164 or whatever Origional passers
InYanoITrust said
Mar 25, 2016
In for the suit if it becomes necessary. PM me if anyone plans on organizing it
sixmonthwonder said
Mar 25, 2016
If DCAS would have just thrown out obviously flawed questions like they always do this never would have happened. Zero changes is what screwed us, heads need to roll at DCAS, glad they're the ones being sued at least. Maybe if they will just accept the changes submitted by the TVB and add to the list all this can go away?
Also in for the lawsuit if the in juncture is granted on Monday, will be in touch. I have a small squad of original test day passer friends that are in as well. Hopefully this doesn't break the bank, but this is what it might come to.
ltexm2015 said
Mar 25, 2016
Break the banks?? You're talking about losing thousands of dollars each month for your life time!!
Devil Dog said
Mar 25, 2016
sixmonthwonder wrote:
If DCAS would have just thrown out obviously flawed questions like they always do this never would have happened. Zero changes is what screwed us, heads need to roll at DCAS, glad they're the ones being sued at least. Maybe if they will just accept the changes submitted by the TVB and add to the list all this can go away?
Also in for the lawsuit if the in juncture is granted on Monday, will be in touch. I have a small squad of original test day passer friends that are in as well. Hopefully this doesn't break the bank, but this is what it might come to.
i have a squad here as well. We will exceed 100 people easily. Hopefully it's not necessary
GDASSCLUB said
Mar 25, 2016
Would we allow any of the make-ups to join this suit, or only the elite 164?
ltexm2015 said
Mar 25, 2016
Just bc they took a makeup doesn't mean they cheated!!
Suckerpunched said
Mar 25, 2016
GDASSCLUB wrote:
Would we allow any of the make-ups to join this suit, or only the elite 164?
It should only be the ORIGINAL 164.
whatadebacle said
Mar 25, 2016
Never been on this forum before but what is happening is an atrocity against the people who passed on the first day. which I am a part of as well. count me in 100%.
PROVE IT said
Mar 25, 2016
i still highly doubt this list will be thrown out...just going to be a deep investigation and the delaying of the inevitable, which is the promotion of legit passers
Nikkydenimblue said
Mar 25, 2016
I hope u are right. I have a huge headache over this. I thought the worst was over. I was wrong. Studying for this test was the hardest thing I've ever done. I was a new mother and instead of taking care of my newborn i decided to study. I ultimately decided that for the better of my family and if they take this away from us... It's too much.
fodx said
Mar 25, 2016
Isnt curving it just as much grounds for a lawsuit as throwing it out? That makes everyone else have to wait longer now for the next exam because the list gets bigger. And why should a 64 have to wait as a 65 makes the list. Throw this POS exam out for Christmas sakes.
Original164 said
Mar 25, 2016
Count me in too
senior said
Mar 25, 2016
Count me in too, I took test on original date,
Revolver787 said
Mar 25, 2016
I'm in, original takers only is my opinion. Let The others sue on an alternate date!
PROVE IT said
Mar 25, 2016
count me in ...please PM me so i can join...whatever it takes....this time the job, the city, and the 9 criminals will not win!!!
fodx said
Mar 25, 2016
Lets just all agree to throw it out. Lets all go to City Hall and do "Throw it out" chants. One big happy. Group hug.
Prop26 said
Mar 25, 2016
Count me in too. Original test taker and passed. Just PM me and let me know. I'm not letting these 9 pre madonnas get away with this atrocity that they are causing.
sixmonthwonder said
Mar 25, 2016
An unholy alliance.
We might have to join forces with them. Like it or not, our fates might be tied together with the makeup exam passers. It has come to this, passers vs. failures.
As I've said before, you can't be too mad at the makeup testers, maybe the LOD, but not those with legitimate reasons. If I took the test months later than everyone else even if I had no intention of actively cheating I would automatically have an advantage. This is a broken system, the City allows this to happen and hasn't done anything about it for decades. It's literally entrapment to set this system up and then say they "cheated."
If things go downhill on Monday I'm all in no matter what, but I'm open to the unholy alliance. Hopefully it doesn't come to that.
Jabronijoe29 said
Mar 25, 2016
100% in also
papote170 said
Mar 25, 2016
at what time is this debacle supposed to be heard in court on Monday ? ,, I'm considering taking a ride downtown to either witness Armageddon or head over to a bar and celebrate future promotions lol
Nikkydenimblue said
Mar 25, 2016
Four
Prop26 said
Mar 25, 2016
We should all go over there to witness this. I'm serious about this. Are we allowed to go in and be there witnessing this?
Slate said
Mar 25, 2016
Hopefully nothing comes out of this besides a little delay. But if it does, I am IN (original passer).
Simple solution to all this, start promoting original passers while investigation is being conducted on makeups. Then come back to either promote or disqualify them. Problem solved.
Nikkydenimblue said
Mar 25, 2016
Lol I don't know. I think we are.
Devil Dog said
Mar 25, 2016
We should all have about 1k available for a retainer in the near future. I think a private group on Facebook would prob be an effective way to organize. Thankfully, I've gotten many texts and Pms regarding the suit. Seems like no one is taking this lightly. Let's hope for the best Monday.
Cheaterpolice said
Mar 25, 2016
I am in on a lawsuit. I can't study again.
92Fot said
Mar 25, 2016
Let us know if you set up a private page. As much as I enjoy reading everyone's screen names in the paper it will be nice to take this to a private forum with atleast some verification of who we are.
Devil Dog said
Mar 25, 2016
92Fot wrote:
Let us know if you set up a private page. As much as I enjoy reading everyone's screen names in the paper it will be nice to take this to a private forum with atleast some verification of who we are.
Yes. Will set it up Monday if necessary or if we are still unsure of the results.
Jabronijoe29 said
Mar 25, 2016
Devil dog on point... We will def have more then enough people... Hopefully doesn't get to that point but we will convene if it does
Devil Dog said
Mar 25, 2016
Jabronijoe29 wrote:
Devil dog on point... We will def have more then enough people... Hopefully doesn't get to that point but we will convene if it does
around 50 or so have already pledged their support. Keep it coming
96Times6 said
Mar 25, 2016
+1 for the suit (original passer)
sixmonthwonder said
Mar 25, 2016
Hopefully I won't be getting to know all of you a lot better beyond this board on Monday, but if it comes down to it I guess see all of you next week.
guys relax, from what I understand the end game of this lawsuit is not to get the test thrown out. I think their main objective is to get the test curved from 65 and up to be passers, or at least have a fair analysis of the questions submitted for changes.... And we all know that what ever debacle occurred at the TVB it was absolutely not a fair analysis of the questions submitted for changes.
That is def their main goal. Get it curved or a new TVB
I think they would throw out the list before they curve it.
Sweet f*cking Christ, if that occurs: all hell well break loose
-- Edited by Su Madre 24 on Friday 25th of March 2016 10:38:44 PM
I want every smart man and women from the elite to breathe. I want you to think. I want you to rationalize and break this all down. 1- a federal judge will either grant or deny an in juncture monday. The job has ZERO choice but to cancel promotions bc if the in juncture is granted...then it's safer to cancel promotions on a Thursday rather then scramble on a Monday at 1800. 2- break down the arguements presented. Loud noise?? Oh I'm sorry guess the whole world should stop on a spring April day so you can pass a test. Proctor leaving and bathroom talking??? Really?? I hope the sgt who saw that made an immediate IAB notification for corruption. Answer key being posted? If someone took a picture of they key that would be an individual problem not relating to anything to do w any test taker. Finally the questions...shame on you if you provided questions to any future test taker. Ppl talking about questions will never change....what needs to change is the administering of future tests. All stuff that concludes no one I can see who went out of their way to cheat. Any at test taker where there's proof he saught out questions should be dealt w swiftly. This will all come out ...you're hearing a one sided story by a bunch of sgts who are feeding the media what they want to hear.
-- Edited by ltexm2015 on Friday 25th of March 2016 11:42:33 AM
City won't negotiate like that. I'd bet if an injunction is granted, they toss it. Which will result in a huge lawsuit vs the city and the lying sgts. Or if no injunction they'll promote and investigate some alleged cheaters.
-- Edited by Devil Dog on Friday 25th of March 2016 01:19:15 PM
These are the only 2 scenarios I see happening. They would scrap it before they curved it.
Also, I read the court complaint. It only has cheating allegations in it. Nothing in there about bad TVB or 70 passing is too hard or anything like that. Cheating allegations don't make failures into passers.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2016/03/24/order.pdf
A link to the court complaint for those interested. There's a lot of cry baby bullsh*t in there.
-- Edited by IShredMajors on Friday 25th of March 2016 01:36:31 PM
We wont need the SBA. I'll bet we get a 100 people easy, which would be a substancial amount of resources.
yep. We should also seek an injuction to stop any future LTs test until the original passers have been promoted ( if not jammed etc.). Let's take a deep breath and see where we are Monday. Will be easy to get a cpl of us to make calls and meet up for sit downs.
-- Edited by Devil Dog on Friday 25th of March 2016 02:02:02 PM
Also in for the lawsuit if the in juncture is granted on Monday, will be in touch. I have a small squad of original test day passer friends that are in as well. Hopefully this doesn't break the bank, but this is what it might come to.
i have a squad here as well. We will exceed 100 people easily. Hopefully it's not necessary
It should only be the ORIGINAL 164.
Never been on this forum before but what is happening is an atrocity against the people who passed on the first day. which I am a part of as well. count me in 100%.
We might have to join forces with them. Like it or not, our fates might be tied together with the makeup exam passers. It has come to this, passers vs. failures.
As I've said before, you can't be too mad at the makeup testers, maybe the LOD, but not those with legitimate reasons. If I took the test months later than everyone else even if I had no intention of actively cheating I would automatically have an advantage. This is a broken system, the City allows this to happen and hasn't done anything about it for decades. It's literally entrapment to set this system up and then say they "cheated."
If things go downhill on Monday I'm all in no matter what, but I'm open to the unholy alliance. Hopefully it doesn't come to that.
Simple solution to all this, start promoting original passers while investigation is being conducted on makeups. Then come back to either promote or disqualify them. Problem solved.
Yes. Will set it up Monday if necessary or if we are still unsure of the results.
around 50 or so have already pledged their support. Keep it coming