how about creating a new screen name and using a random computer so nobody can trace the IP address .. come on people ..grow a pair of balls and take us all out of our misery !!
sgt2be said
Feb 9, 2016
throw down...its no disrespect to you in anyway..its 204 or 218....i blieve you when the job has the list
Throwdown said
Feb 9, 2016
sgt2be wrote:
throw down...its no disrespect to you in anyway..its 204 or 218....i blieve you when the job has the list
True.
-- Edited by Throwdown on Tuesday 9th of February 2016 10:43:59 PM
-- Edited by Throwdown on Tuesday 9th of February 2016 11:04:50 PM
bigfoot45 said
Feb 9, 2016
Maybe there was one change then
sgt2be said
Feb 9, 2016
throw down i give you major props....machine is reliable poster though....but you rocked it and if its 218 or even 204 thanks for everyhting
Throwdown said
Feb 9, 2016
sgt2be wrote:
throw down i give you major props....machine is reliable poster though....but you rocked it and if its 218 or even 204 thanks for everyhting
Very true.
-- Edited by Throwdown on Tuesday 9th of February 2016 11:06:25 PM
Onedownonetogo said
Feb 9, 2016
Letssss get readyyyyy to studyyyyy
ondeeair2321 said
Feb 9, 2016
this is truly shocking
machine said
Feb 9, 2016
By the way, not sure if 2,800 was the number that registered for the test or the number that sat for the test....either or the actual size of the list is 204.
Time to regroup people....God Damn it.
sgt2be said
Feb 9, 2016
HAS ANYONE SEEN THE LIST????? 204 or 218???
Samiam32 said
Feb 9, 2016
Well I can honestly say that I don't feel so bad being amongst the 2400 other people who failed.
machine said
Feb 9, 2016
Sgt2be I'm sure the list will be leaked by tomorrow, it might even be sent to every command....but the "official release date" (whatever that means to u) is scheduled for the 17th.
ondeeair2321 said
Feb 9, 2016
I am also hearing that a certain white shirt was very very very instrumental in the fight against protests. he definitely got the last laugh I can tell you that
machine said
Feb 9, 2016
...also 204 or 218? Who cares?? It sucks either way, but the actual # is 204.
Ineed63 said
Feb 9, 2016
The accepting rate for Harvard University was 6%, this is close
Also confirmed was that capt insano s counter doesn't have as much weight as u guys think! The tvb outweighs him otherwise their is no reason to have a tvb. Stop listening to this BS it is not true. The tvb and dcas hear a reasoning but if it's jacked it's jacked. So stop acting like this guy tom cruised jack Nicholson on the stand. It didn't happen that way ease edp ask ur friend of this. I have asked many and it's simply not true.
__________________
This is ondeairs post 5 days ago. Will this guy ever stop flip flopping??
-- Edited by Samiam32 on Tuesday 9th of February 2016 11:26:38 PM
Ok confirmed---218 on list. Zero changes. These guys are all legit. My buddy's confirmed it and has a copy of it. And as I said list release 2/17. And no jman---I won't be taking another one my friend. Their scheduling it for April 2017. Good luck to all.
Is this the same buddy who told you 208 passers before changes, fact?
Samiam32 said
Feb 10, 2016
The guy is a mental patient
wisecop said
Feb 10, 2016
Sarge wrote:
ondeeair2321 wrote:
Ok confirmed---218 on list. Zero changes. These guys are all legit. My buddy's confirmed it and has a copy of it. And as I said list release 2/17. And no jman---I won't be taking another one my friend. Their scheduling it for April 2017. Good luck to all.
Is this the same buddy who told you 208 passers before changes, fact?
He's only confirming what's on the forum. Zero changes is what I said and what he's been discrediting for weeks. In addition I posted department executives had the names of the passers weeks ago. I'm hearing 218 is the number. I don't know where this 2/17 date is coming from. Im still expecting the list tomorrow.
sixmonthwonder said
Feb 10, 2016
Transitblows said
Feb 10, 2016
I thinks its irrelevant that the list is ether 204 or 218. Zero changes is the big thing. everyone knows if they passed and should be on the list.
-- Edited by Transitblows on Wednesday 10th of February 2016 12:55:23 AM
Doggieloverwoof said
Feb 10, 2016
I can't help but wonder if dcas saw the test we see smh
sgt2be said
Feb 10, 2016
Dcas don't care! They just dont....I'm sorry. There should be changes
bigfoot45 said
Feb 10, 2016
Agreed, there should be at least 5 changes.
Transitblows said
Feb 10, 2016
Are we allowed to question them or ask questions at this protest review?????
sixmonthwonder said
Feb 10, 2016
Transitblows wrote:
Are we allowed to question them or ask questions at this protest review?????
If there even is such a review. If there is I think I'll go to it just to see what sort of ridiculous reasons they give for keeping some of these.
Slate said
Feb 10, 2016
There is, ull get invite in the mail after list is released
DRPapi1983 said
Feb 10, 2016
No one knows list size,...
Slate said
Feb 10, 2016
2011 test people with low 60s were making the list, 2015 on the other hand looks like guys with 69 are not making it and this was a harder exam in my opinion. Doesn't make sense.....
Onedownonetogo said
Feb 10, 2016
I feel bad for you guys... Im a sgt now... Not sure if i want to give up another 6 months of my life for a test that is so messed up... They better reevaluate their test writing procedures... This would be my first shot at LT
-- Edited by Onedownonetogo on Wednesday 10th of February 2016 02:07:06 AM
-- Edited by Onedownonetogo on Wednesday 10th of February 2016 02:07:41 AM
ondeeair2321 said
Feb 10, 2016
2011 exam was an exam of luck. people in the 50 s and 60 s managed to get on the list with the 19 changes. to be in the 60 s here it was 6 months min of studying. the zero changes is a real bazinga to everyone who took this exam who studied hard. however, the job doesn't care
DETSGT said
Feb 10, 2016
ondeeair2321 wrote:
2011 exam was an exam of luck. people in the 50 s and 60 s managed to get on the list with the 19 changes. to be in the 60 s here it was 6 months min of studying. the zero changes is a real bazinga to everyone who took this exam who studied hard. however, the job doesn't care
How the hell did people in the 50's manage to make the list with 19 changes? Is this confirmed? Fact? Lol
Transitblows said
Feb 10, 2016
Yea my lt had a 55 and made the 2011 list
DETSGT said
Feb 10, 2016
Transitblows wrote:
Yea my lt had a 55 and made the 2011 list
That's horrible. And zero throwouts for this exam? Wtf
Bklyn net said
Feb 10, 2016
Can't wait to respond to my next 39 illegal eviction and tell my cop to write that summons ..when my cop turns around looks at me and says sarge this guy has no valid ID and according to the PG in 209 and 214 a VALID PROPER ID IS A MUST ... .I will turn to him and say according to the 2015 LT test u don't need one !!
-- Edited by Bklyn net on Wednesday 10th of February 2016 04:35:15 AM
sixmonthwonder said
Feb 10, 2016
Are electronic devices allowed at the review session?
RookieScum4Life said
Feb 10, 2016
ondeeair2321 wrote:
I am also hearing that a certain white shirt was very very very instrumental in the fight against protests. he definitely got the last laugh I can tell you that
Don't listen to ondeeair2321. I've been on 3 Sergeant exam writing panels and once you are done writing the questions and the exam is given, your job is DONE. You have no involvement whatsoever after the exam is administered. You have ZERO involvement with the TVB.
Onedownonetogo said
Feb 10, 2016
The writers of this exam shouls be banished to the bowels of this dept
sixmonthwonder said
Feb 10, 2016
Onedownonetogo wrote:
The writers of this exam shouls be banished to the bowels of this dept
Yeah, you have no idea. This zero throwout news is mind-boggling.
Sarge said
Feb 10, 2016
i cant help but hope that if original passers was 208 and the list is 218, that there was one throw out ....
scheduleB_magnet said
Feb 10, 2016
WHAT DO WE WANT?...THE LIST!
WHEN DO WE WANT IT?...NOW!
Doggieloverwoof said
Feb 10, 2016
Sarge wrote:
i cant help but hope that if original passers was 208 and the list is 218, that there was one throw out ....
I don't see only 10 people getting added for 1 throwout.... maybe for a double but not a full throwout.
mjehangir96 said
Feb 10, 2016
Doggieloverwoof wrote:
Sarge wrote:
i cant help but hope that if original passers was 208 and the list is 218, that there was one throw out ....
I don't see only 10 people getting added for 1 throwout.... maybe for a double but not a full throwout.
the original numbers could be off as well.... But let's say 128 passed originally and 60 scammers .... That gives us 30 extra people .... At this point , these are are theories till the list comes out.
Doggieloverwoof said
Feb 10, 2016
mjehangir96 wrote:
Doggieloverwoof wrote:
Sarge wrote:
i cant help but hope that if original passers was 208 and the list is 218, that there was one throw out ....
I don't see only 10 people getting added for 1 throwout.... maybe for a double but not a full throwout.
the original numbers could be off as well.... But let's say 128 passed originally and 60 scammers .... That gives us 30 extra people .... At this point , these are are theories till the list comes out.
True... they should just release this disaster already
sgt2be said
Feb 10, 2016
In addition...the difference between a 204 list and 218 person list can give support of changes or not. 204 def no changes...218 slight chance...i keep hearing diff numbers..untill we get a I saw the list....anyone??
DRPapi1983 said
Feb 10, 2016
sgt2be wrote:
In addition...the difference between a 204 list and 218 person list can give support of changes or not. 204 def no changes...218 slight chance...i keep hearing diff numbers..untill we get a I saw the list....anyone??
Smh,...It'll be over soon,...cant wait for this list to come out. Hope it's today
Flambino said
Feb 10, 2016
Didn't THROWDOWN see the list?
Jamwich said
Feb 10, 2016
This wait is like watching a birth!!!
Doggieloverwoof said
Feb 10, 2016
Jamwich wrote:
This wait is like watching a birth!!!
It's been 10 months.... we could have all had a baby by now lol
True.
-- Edited by Throwdown on Tuesday 9th of February 2016 10:43:59 PM
-- Edited by Throwdown on Tuesday 9th of February 2016 11:04:50 PM
Maybe there was one change then
Very true.
-- Edited by Throwdown on Tuesday 9th of February 2016 11:06:25 PM
Time to regroup people....God Damn it.
Also confirmed was that capt insano s counter doesn't have as much weight as u guys think! The tvb outweighs him otherwise their is no reason to have a tvb. Stop listening to this BS it is not true. The tvb and dcas hear a reasoning but if it's jacked it's jacked. So stop acting like this guy tom cruised jack Nicholson on the stand. It didn't happen that way ease edp ask ur friend of this. I have asked many and it's simply not true.
This is ondeairs post 5 days ago. Will this guy ever stop flip flopping??
-- Edited by Samiam32 on Tuesday 9th of February 2016 11:26:38 PM
Is this the same buddy who told you 208 passers before changes, fact?
He's only confirming what's on the forum. Zero changes is what I said and what he's been discrediting for weeks. In addition I posted department executives had the names of the passers weeks ago. I'm hearing 218 is the number. I don't know where this 2/17 date is coming from. Im still expecting the list tomorrow.
I thinks its irrelevant that the list is ether 204 or 218. Zero changes is the big thing. everyone knows if they passed and should be on the list.
-- Edited by Transitblows on Wednesday 10th of February 2016 12:55:23 AM
Agreed, there should be at least 5 changes.
If there even is such a review. If there is I think I'll go to it just to see what sort of ridiculous reasons they give for keeping some of these.
I feel bad for you guys... Im a sgt now... Not sure if i want to give up another 6 months of my life for a test that is so messed up... They better reevaluate their test writing procedures... This would be my first shot at LT
-- Edited by Onedownonetogo on Wednesday 10th of February 2016 02:07:06 AM
-- Edited by Onedownonetogo on Wednesday 10th of February 2016 02:07:41 AM
How the hell did people in the 50's manage to make the list with 19 changes? Is this confirmed? Fact? Lol
That's horrible. And zero throwouts for this exam? Wtf
Can't wait to respond to my next 39 illegal eviction and tell my cop to write that summons ..when my cop turns around looks at me and says sarge this guy has no valid ID and according to the PG in 209 and 214 a VALID PROPER ID IS A MUST ...
.I will turn to him and say according to the 2015 LT test u don't need one !!
-- Edited by Bklyn net on Wednesday 10th of February 2016 04:35:15 AM
Don't listen to ondeeair2321. I've been on 3 Sergeant exam writing panels and once you are done writing the questions and the exam is given, your job is DONE. You have no involvement whatsoever after the exam is administered. You have ZERO involvement with the TVB.
Yeah, you have no idea. This zero throwout news is mind-boggling.
i cant help but hope that if original passers was 208 and the list is 218, that there was one throw out ....
WHAT DO WE WANT?...THE LIST!
WHEN DO WE WANT IT?...NOW!
I don't see only 10 people getting added for 1 throwout.... maybe for a double but not a full throwout.
the original numbers could be off as well.... But let's say 128 passed originally and 60 scammers .... That gives us 30 extra people .... At this point , these are are theories till the list comes out.
True... they should just release this disaster already
Smh,...It'll be over soon,...cant wait for this list to come out. Hope it's today
It's been 10 months.... we could have all had a baby by now lol