78. The National Weather Service has predicted a Category 1 Hurricane on a direct course to strike lower Manhattan. The Mayor has activated the CIMS protocol to handle this potential incident. The structure will be a Unified Command Element....Blah Blah Blah...... Lt Rice has be given the responsibility of managing the utilization, assignment and deployment of a meteorologist that has been assigned by the National Weather Service. According to PG 220-01, Lt. Rice would be MOST correct to that he has been assigned the role of:
86. PO Petriv appoaches Lt Bernanos and states that he has been directed to appear in cour for jury duty. According to PG 205-26, Lt Bernanos would be MOST correct to indicate to PO Petriv that:
Junius78 said
Nov 9, 2015
#7 and #54? Anyone have info on body of question and what possible doubles may be from them?
Su Madre 24 said
Nov 9, 2015
54 is the slapping Mexicans
7 might be the illegal wviction
Team J said
Nov 9, 2015
86 was a ground ball question l. I don't see how that would be a throw out . That's the only one I am skeptical about.
HardExam said
Nov 9, 2015
86 was never discussed amongst us... #14 was the bull**** unlawful eviction
mjehangir96 said
Nov 9, 2015
TVB doesn't look at every question and analyze it as if it should be a double, triple or a throw out. They base their findings on the protests submitted. First off like I said previously and sgt2be also said it that majority of the submitted protests were not even considered by the dcas due to not providing evidence with the argument or not presenting a valid argument. So if valid protest argued that question number 45 should be a double , TVB will base their findings only on that argument. They can not start looking at the body of question and finding mistakes or other arguments on their own.
HardExam said
Nov 9, 2015
How are guys here able to quote the question word for word?
Tavares91 said
Nov 9, 2015
HardExam wrote:
86 was never discussed amongst us... #14 was the bull**** unlawful eviction
you are incorrect, #14 is about searching for armed/dangerous persons in subway...#10 was unlawful eviction
-- Edited by Tavares91 on Monday 9th of November 2015 09:01:43 PM
CoptoCapt said
Nov 9, 2015
Su Madre 24 wrote:
54 is the slapping Mexicans
7 might be the illegal wviction
7. Immediate after speaking with Sgt Vaughn about the bank deposit, you begin to peruse and scrutinize the Command Log. Accordingly, which on of the following actions is LEAST correct:
54. Long family dispute question, ending in the male slapping the female in the face.
SU, I dont know where you got MEXICANS from, but from that statement, I know where YOUR head is at!!! Please be on the desk when I have the duty!!!
narco26 said
Nov 9, 2015
I heard that captains a real loser with no friends is it true
Flambino said
Nov 9, 2015
Does anyone remember which question had the typo and didn't make any sense? I think it had to do with a summons notification. If that is not a throw-out something is wrong.
DRPapi1983 said
Nov 9, 2015
DETSGT wrote:
emt54 wrote:
HardExam wrote:
emt54 wrote:
45 and 7 make zero sense as doubles...
45 makes complete sense
Nope. 45 asked you to pick the most correct answer . The proposed correct answer was wrong and so were the rest .
Agreed. 100%
So 45 should be a throw out no?
jfedster said
Nov 9, 2015
Flambino wrote:
Does anyone remember which question had the typo and didn't make any sense? I think it had to do with a summons notification. If that is not a throw-out something is wrong.
Stop whining, that question was a perfect example of grammatical EXCELLENCE!!! YOU clearly must be retarded.
Flambino said
Nov 9, 2015
jfedster wrote:
Flambino wrote:
Does anyone remember which question had the typo and didn't make any sense? I think it had to do with a summons notification. If that is not a throw-out something is wrong.
Stop whining, that question was a perfect example of grammatical EXCELLENCE!!! YOU clearly must be retarded.
Maybe you right... I don't speak English so good.
DETSGT said
Nov 9, 2015
bigfoot45 wrote:
Guys, the bottom line is 45 must be a throw out or the board is incompetent
Agreed.
Although I wouldn't out it past this job that somehow it's a double.
Tavares91 said
Nov 9, 2015
89. PO Langi approaches Lt. Warek, the Desk Officer, seeking guidance, after being several summons and complaint by the Operations Coordinator, Lt. Lackey regarding an arrest. In according with P.G. Procedure 211-21, "Obtaining Assistance of Corporation Counsel," Lt. Warek would most correct to inform Po Langi to
Flambino said
Nov 9, 2015
Tavares91 wrote:
89. PO Langi approaches Lt. Warek, the Desk Officer, seeking guidance, after being several summons and complaint by the Operations Coordinator, Lt. Lackey regarding an arrest. In according with P.G. Procedure 211-21, "Obtaining Assistance of Corporation Counsel," Lt. Warek would most correct to inform Po Langi to
Thank you. That has to get tossed right? Maybe #86 that is supposedly a throw-out is a typo and it should be #89. Just a theory...
sgt2be said
Nov 9, 2015
not getting tossed....i dont believe it was even submitted to dcas to be tossed
Throwdown said
Nov 9, 2015
I have 3 of those doubles/triples, need all 3 to come my way to get the magic # of 70.....so close, yet so far.
Flambino said
Nov 9, 2015
sgt2be wrote:
not getting tossed....i dont believe it was even submitted to dcas to be tossed
Thanks. I'm really surprised by that. The question makes no sense...but neither did that whole test I guess. If all those changes are legit I just need one of the doubles/triples land. I'm grasping at straws.
Tavares91 said
Nov 9, 2015
im shocked 89 counts also...how can a question count if it makes no sense...????
sgt2be said
Nov 9, 2015
i think alot of ppl are going to be surprised at the reasons for not tossing questions. I know what question you are talking about...it took me 3 or 4 times reading it to understand it.
DatnoidS said
Nov 9, 2015
I know a reliable guy who knows another guy. That guy knows the top guy who confirmed from another guy that there are 7 throw outs and one double.
Who ever started this thread is a straight up scam artist and loves attention.
DRPapi1983 said
Nov 9, 2015
So are we saying that Ondeeairs' info is NO GOOD????
DatnoidS said
Nov 9, 2015
Get a life. U love to give false hopes. I think u should start a thread on when the next dooms day on earth.
ondeeair2321 said
Nov 9, 2015
Hey datnoids. U sir---are a jag off. 7 throw outs and 1 double. Another a hole spewing Bologna.
Throwdown said
Nov 9, 2015
ondeeair2321 wrote:
Hey datnoids. U sir---are a jag off. 7 throw outs and 1 double. Another a hole spewing Bologna.
Dude get the answers foe the doubles and does that include triples or are they all just doubles?
-- Edited by Throwdown on Monday 9th of November 2015 10:33:47 PM
DatnoidS said
Nov 9, 2015
DRPapi1983 wrote:
So are we saying that Ondeeairs' info is NO GOOD????
he is "half way right" im sure there is a math formula for his false cr@p already. whoever this guy is, he needs to get a damn life & not create false threads to get people all hyped up for nothing
Sarge said
Nov 9, 2015
Flambino wrote:
sgt2be wrote:
not getting tossed....i dont believe it was even submitted to dcas to be tossed
Thanks. I'm really surprised by that. The question makes no sense...but neither did that whole test I guess. If all those changes are legit I just need one of the doubles/triples land. I'm grasping at straws.
If I remember correctly I protested that question on the grounds that grammatically it didn't make sense. If that was indeed question #89 I am very surprised they kept it, but honestly nobody really knows if they kept it or not yet....
NOWAYOUT said
Nov 9, 2015
LicknBallz is awfully quiet now !
Flambino said
Nov 9, 2015
Sarge wrote:
Flambino wrote:
sgt2be wrote:
not getting tossed....i dont believe it was even submitted to dcas to be tossed
Thanks. I'm really surprised by that. The question makes no sense...but neither did that whole test I guess. If all those changes are legit I just need one of the doubles/triples land. I'm grasping at straws.
If I remember correctly I protested that question on the grounds that grammatically it didn't make sense. If that was indeed question #89 I am very surprised they kept it, but honestly nobody really knows if they kept it or not yet....
I protested it too. Same reasons. It was not grammatically correct and was impossible to answer because you could not determine what the question was asking. Hopefully my #86 is actually #89 theory is true.
Su Madre 24 said
Nov 9, 2015
I think your theory is absurd
Team J said
Nov 9, 2015
Flambino wrote:
Sarge wrote:
Flambino wrote:
sgt2be wrote:
not getting tossed....i dont believe it was even submitted to dcas to be tossed
Thanks. I'm really surprised by that. The question makes no sense...but neither did that whole test I guess. If all those changes are legit I just need one of the doubles/triples land. I'm grasping at straws.
If I remember correctly I protested that question on the grounds that grammatically it didn't make sense. If that was indeed question #89 I am very surprised they kept it, but honestly nobody really knows if they kept it or not yet....
I protested it too. Same reasons. It was not grammatically correct and was impossible to answer because you could not determine what the question was asking. Hopefully my #86 is actually #89 theory is true.
I agree... Should be 89
Flambino said
Nov 9, 2015
Su Madre 24 wrote:
I think your theory is absurd
Haha. I think you are right.
Flambino said
Nov 9, 2015
Hey Su Madre. Team J believes. Thanks Team J.
Jusstice4U said
Nov 9, 2015
#54..... whats the consensus on the 2 answers looking like......
Junius78 said
Nov 9, 2015
Im wondering about #54 as well... Any chance a triple?
Jman, licknclitz, and joe John both versions are pieces of absolute s**t. This is a forum for info and they troll for their own amusement. U are disgusting human beings and terrible that as cops u do this. Bosses nontheless some of u.
ondeeair2321 said
Nov 9, 2015
I post information on it from legit sources and believe me there are others in this forum that no for a FACT the number 9 is a confirmed fact. fACt. Believe these other jerk offs and the rabbits their pulling out of f n hats at ur own peril. They re selling u unicorns my friends. And for that I find them nauseating. And I noticed it all started with jman. King jerk off
onedeeair232l said
Nov 9, 2015
ondeeair2321 wrote:
Jman, licknclitz, and joe John both versions are pieces of absolute s**t. This is a forum for info and they troll for their own amusement. U are disgusting human beings and terrible that as cops u do this. Bosses nontheless some of u.
Watch your language please
scheduleB_magnet said
Nov 9, 2015
Ondeeair, didn't you quit this forum?
Licknclitz said
Nov 9, 2015
Ondeair aka RatBastard has really stirred the pot. Everyone took the bait, well mostly everyone. I can't believe you guys are still buying his snake oil. The throw out number is 12. List is mid 600. Can't wait for this list to become public knowledge.
HardExam said
Nov 9, 2015
Why ? So you can be some loser behind a computer screen and keyboard letting everyone know you were right..
Junius78 said
Nov 9, 2015
Ondeairr said the news is all around 1PP... Can anyone else confirm this? Besides those who received texts from people second hand?
CaptDoucheinaj said
Nov 9, 2015
Ondeeair, and cunnilingus-guy...all your info is wrong! No one will defeat my questions!
Drstylez12 said
Nov 9, 2015
I spoke to somebody that works at 1pp and they get their info from this site so yeahhh.....
GDASSCLUB said
Nov 10, 2015
Police work 101: when an individual keeps trying to tell the truth, chances are they a full of sh#t! All the screen names that seem to know the changes keep repeating themselves over and over again. Wake up people they are lying to us. Don't be fooled!
ondeeair2321 said
Nov 10, 2015
there is a lot of us who know of the 9. the doubles we dont have choices---but will get them for u. good luck
86. PO Petriv appoaches Lt Bernanos and states that he has been directed to appear in cour for jury duty. According to PG 205-26, Lt Bernanos would be MOST correct to indicate to PO Petriv that:
7 might be the illegal wviction
86 was a ground ball question l. I don't see how that would be a throw out . That's the only one I am skeptical about.
you are incorrect, #14 is about searching for armed/dangerous persons in subway...#10 was unlawful eviction
-- Edited by Tavares91 on Monday 9th of November 2015 09:01:43 PM
7. Immediate after speaking with Sgt Vaughn about the bank deposit, you begin to peruse and scrutinize the Command Log. Accordingly, which on of the following actions is LEAST correct:
54. Long family dispute question, ending in the male slapping the female in the face.
SU, I dont know where you got MEXICANS from, but from that statement, I know where YOUR head is at!!! Please be on the desk when I have the duty!!!
So 45 should be a throw out no?
Stop whining, that question was a perfect example of grammatical EXCELLENCE!!! YOU clearly must be retarded.
Maybe you right... I don't speak English so good.
Agreed.
Although I wouldn't out it past this job that somehow it's a double.
89. PO Langi approaches Lt. Warek, the Desk Officer, seeking guidance, after being several summons and complaint by the Operations Coordinator, Lt. Lackey regarding an arrest. In according with P.G. Procedure 211-21, "Obtaining Assistance of Corporation Counsel," Lt. Warek would most correct to inform Po Langi to
Thank you. That has to get tossed right? Maybe #86 that is supposedly a throw-out is a typo and it should be #89. Just a theory...
Thanks. I'm really surprised by that. The question makes no sense...but neither did that whole test I guess. If all those changes are legit I just need one of the doubles/triples land. I'm grasping at straws.
Who ever started this thread is a straight up scam artist and loves attention.
Dude get the answers foe the doubles and does that include triples or are they all just doubles?
-- Edited by Throwdown on Monday 9th of November 2015 10:33:47 PM
he is "half way right" im sure there is a math formula for his false cr@p already. whoever this guy is, he needs to get a damn life & not create false threads to get people all hyped up for nothing
If I remember correctly I protested that question on the grounds that grammatically it didn't make sense. If that was indeed question #89 I am very surprised they kept it, but honestly nobody really knows if they kept it or not yet....
I protested it too. Same reasons. It was not grammatically correct and was impossible to answer because you could not determine what the question was asking. Hopefully my #86 is actually #89 theory is true.
I agree... Should be 89
Haha. I think you are right.
Lmaoooooooo
Watch your language please
I spoke to somebody that works at 1pp and they get their info from this site so yeahhh.....
there is a lot of us who know of the 9. the doubles we dont have choices---but will get them for u. good luck