I know someone who received a 65 and was shocked that they were called to verify veterans points but they went down and did.
It's crazy. When I took this test, I thought that it was so neatly put together that there would be no throwouts. But with people verifying Veteran points with 65s and allegedly 64s and below, I guess I was wrong. That being said one of my friends from the puzzle palace said that there was a curve. I asked him if he got that from the rising star, he said no and that he knows someone from DCAS. I'm still going to be veeeeeeeerrrryy skeptical about that. Maybe he got it from the same source as JDMEV09. But only time will tell I guess.
Hahaha... Ill NEVER mention source, but like Aladdin, while standing on a magic carpet, I extend my hand and ask -- Do you trust me ?
A few more days ! Then I get to Really Talk sh*** to the Haters on here.
Disclaimer:
(I hope my psychic abilities are correct)
-- Edited by JDMEVO9 on Tuesday 12th of December 2017 10:50:40 AM
IamTheLaw said
Dec 12, 2017
JDMEVO9 wrote:
IamTheLaw wrote:
Samiam32 wrote:
I know someone who received a 65 and was shocked that they were called to verify veterans points but they went down and did.
It's crazy. When I took this test, I thought that it was so neatly put together that there would be no throwouts. But with people verifying Veteran points with 65s and allegedly 64s and below, I guess I was wrong. That being said one of my friends from the puzzle palace said that there was a curve. I asked him if he got that from the rising star, he said no and that he knows someone from DCAS. I'm still going to be veeeeeeeerrrryy skeptical about that. Maybe he got it from the same source as JDMEV09. But only time will tell I guess.
Hahaha... Ill NEVER mention source, but like Aladdin, while standing on a magic carpet, I extend my hand and ask -- Do you trust me ?
A few more days ! Then I get to Really Talk sh*** to the Haters on here.
Disclaimer:
(I hope my psychic abilities are correct)
-- Edited by JDMEVO9 on Tuesday 12th of December 2017 10:50:40 AM
I would never reveal a source either so I fully agree with ya. That being said, There is alot of smoke to what you've been saying. That leads me to believe that there is a fire. I mean you're a senior member of this sight with no reason to troll us. I know someone who claims to have seen the list and said it was huge. That lines up with what you've been saying about people pass failing. I also was told by someone I know and trust that he was told there would be some kind of curve (still skeptical about it being an actual curve and assuming it's a mass amount of throwouts). It took ten months and this list hasn't dropped. Original passers goes from 700s to 1200s to 1400s to over 2000s. With all signs pointing to you being onto something. The 61 curve does line up with the 2600 person list. Sooooo I'm gonna say eff it and hop onto the carpet and trust ya! Lol. But if it all comes crashing down that's on you.
Caralho said
Dec 12, 2017
IamTheLaw wrote:
JDMEVO9 wrote:
IamTheLaw wrote:
Samiam32 wrote:
I know someone who received a 65 and was shocked that they were called to verify veterans points but they went down and did.
It's crazy. When I took this test, I thought that it was so neatly put together that there would be no throwouts. But with people verifying Veteran points with 65s and allegedly 64s and below, I guess I was wrong. That being said one of my friends from the puzzle palace said that there was a curve. I asked him if he got that from the rising star, he said no and that he knows someone from DCAS. I'm still going to be veeeeeeeerrrryy skeptical about that. Maybe he got it from the same source as JDMEV09. But only time will tell I guess.
Hahaha... Ill NEVER mention source, but like Aladdin, while standing on a magic carpet, I extend my hand and ask -- Do you trust me ?
A few more days ! Then I get to Really Talk sh*** to the Haters on here.
Disclaimer:
(I hope my psychic abilities are correct)
-- Edited by JDMEVO9 on Tuesday 12th of December 2017 10:50:40 AM
I would never reveal a source either so I fully agree with ya. That being said, There is alot of smoke to what you've been saying. That leads me to believe that there is a fire. I mean you're a senior member of this sight with no reason to troll us. I know someone who claims to have seen the list and said it was huge. That lines up with what you've been saying about people pass failing. I also was told by someone I know and trust that he was told there would be some kind of curve (still skeptical about it being an actual curve and assuming it's a mass amount of throwouts). It took ten months and this list hasn't dropped. Original passers goes from 700s to 1200s to 1400s to over 2000s. With all signs pointing to you being onto something. The 61 curve does line up with the 2600 person list. Sooooo I'm gonna say eff it and hop onto the carpet and trust ya! Lol. But if it all comes crashing down that's on you.
Nice.
IamTheLaw said
Dec 12, 2017
jay012983 wrote:
No sgt class will finish bmoc before the final raise in march. its that simple. no bmoc in dec, jan, or feb. as for the list...i have no clue and wont pretend that i do but i could see them holding out until feb or so just so the dept couldnt try to put classes in before the march raise. You will certainly hit top pay in a year if your part of any class that gets made before the final march raise and the city does not want that.
You were right Jay. Just heard from the academy. Class is delayed indefinitely.
jay012983 said
Dec 12, 2017
i knew it!!! its not coming out until feb/march. dont listen to the trolls.
BML said
Dec 13, 2017
A raven just arrived from Dragonstone...The List is coming!
IamTheLaw said
Dec 13, 2017
BML wrote:
A raven just arrived from Dragonstone...The List is coming!
If it's out by Friday, I'll bend the Knee!
BONESAWisREADY said
Dec 13, 2017
IamTheLaw wrote:
BML wrote:
A raven just arrived from Dragonstone...The List is coming!
If it's out by Friday, I'll bend the Knee!
I used to be hopeful like you, till I took an arrow in the knee
4th Time said
Dec 13, 2017
Guys and gals. Believe in the Brat.
NightOwl said
Dec 13, 2017
Ok no one will be at top pay a year later, they will be frozen at that Step till they reach top pay. Dont believe me? Take a look
A quirk in the Patrolmens Benevolent Association contract reached in late January that meant members of that union who were subsequently promoted from Police Officer to Sergeant faced a pay cut led the de Blasio administration to temporarily upgrade salary for the new promotees.
Straight to Step 4
In doing so, however, the city had to promote them to the fourth step on the pay scale for Sergeants, meaning they would also be receiving more in base pay during their first year in that rank than those who had reached it three years ago. Although they will be frozen at that step on the pay scale for their first four years in the rank, the move has stirred resentment among some other Sergeants who have not yet reached maximum pay, and prompted talk among them of bringing a lawsuit.
when the co tract first hit that was the assumptions
when the cops were sworn and promoted to sergeant
they jumped some steps and will be going to top pay in June 2018.
you cannot say OOPS, this benefits OR DOESNT benefit certain members
you can only make FUTURE CHANGES.
its not a Scratch 61 where you can just Fuukk with a contract and change what benefits someone
new hires wont get So lucky
TransitJoe said
Dec 13, 2017
The article is not old, it's from September. And if the NYC Labor commissioner says that those sgts will be at 3rd step for 4 yrs, I'd believe that Over anyone else.
And when the sgts do stay at 3rd step, do you think the sba will start an expensive lawsuit against the city just for 2% of their membership?
-- Edited by TransitJoe on Wednesday 13th of December 2017 04:07:51 PM
JDMEVO9 said
Dec 13, 2017
Transit arent real cops
they never know anything
nontheless difference between opinion and facts
go back in the hole
Caballo Loco said
Dec 13, 2017
That comment basically shot down any credibility you had on this site.
Moving on!
Thebirds said
Dec 13, 2017
He's not wrong tho
Aqfyn3st said
Dec 13, 2017
Department got the list back.... PC has to sign. If not by Friday before or by next Wednesday. Final passing Number remains as I mentioned. Its been a pleasure. Good luck to all. Class first week of January.
Caralho said
Dec 13, 2017
Aqfyn3st wrote:
Department got the list back.... PC has to sign. If not by Friday before or by next Wednesday. Final passing Number remains as I mentioned. Its been a pleasure. Good luck to all. Class first week of January.
Whats the final passing?
HanginByAThread said
Dec 13, 2017
Generally, when the department recieves the list back they waste no time signing and putting it through the finest message. I dont have a source who knows anything about the list but if agfynest is right then it shouldnt be too long.
If you guys want to see for yourselves what I am saying, look at the 2013 Sgts exam on the top left of the first page. Printed by dcas at 1700 hours on one day then STAMPED by 10am the next morning by the department and leaked by the afternoon.
We shall see in the next coming days if this news is accurate.
Caralho said
Dec 13, 2017
HanginByAThread wrote:
Generally, when the department recieves the list back they waste no time signing and putting it through the finest message. I dont have a source who knows anything about the list but if agfynest is right then it shouldnt be too long.
If you guys want to see for yourselves what I am saying, look at the 2013 Sgts exam on the top left of the first page. Printed by dcas at 1700 hours on one day then STAMPED by 10am the next morning by the department and leaked by the afternoon.
We shall see in the next coming days if this news is accurate.
Your absolutely right!
Aqfyn3st said
Dec 13, 2017
I try to pass info as I get them. By no means I am right. Everything I say is subject to change. All the Borough will be sending someone to pick up a copy of the list by Friday this way they can plan accordingly on how many bodies they will lose and needs to Be replaced. Holiday season and everything else going on every administration is different. I am just glad its not on mercy of DCAS no more.
Caralho said
Dec 13, 2017
Aqfyn3st wrote:
I try to pass info as I get them. By no means I am right. Everything I say is subject to change. All the Borough will be sending someone to pick up a copy of the list by Friday this way they can plan accordingly on how many bodies they will lose and needs to Be replaced. Holiday season and everything else going on every administration is different. I am just glad its not on mercy of DCAS no more.
But whats the number of passers? Do you know?
Aqfyn3st said
Dec 13, 2017
Less than 1300
IamTheLaw said
Dec 13, 2017
Caralho wrote:
Aqfyn3st wrote:
I try to pass info as I get them. By no means I am right. Everything I say is subject to change. All the Borough will be sending someone to pick up a copy of the list by Friday this way they can plan accordingly on how many bodies they will lose and needs to Be replaced. Holiday season and everything else going on every administration is different. I am just glad its not on mercy of DCAS no more.
But whats the number of passers? Do you know?
I think that he meant that the passing number is 70. Not that he knows the number of passers.
Caralho said
Dec 13, 2017
Aqfyn3st wrote:
Less than 1300
So this person on here claiming to have people verify vet points with 65 s and a big List is a fraud..??
HanginByAThread said
Dec 13, 2017
He had posted a few pages back that the number of passers was approximately 1280. That is a reasonable number and matches the amount of throwouts/double answers. That has been the number being thrown around for months until people started posting insane stuff.
Aqfyn3st said
Dec 13, 2017
Notice of examination stated 70. You can create any scenario you like but its what they mentioned and its what you signed for and fingerprinted to. I will try to get a better accurate info Friday.
HanginByAThread said
Dec 13, 2017
If the list is at 1pp theres no way in hell we wont know how many passers by friday. Its gonna spread like wildfire.
If its true that is.
A10shun said
Dec 13, 2017
Confirming that list is in the hands of pd. Just a matter of time. < 1 week
A10shun said
Dec 13, 2017
About 40 people from 2016 list will be on it. Subject to change. But doubt it
This is regarding the January class
-- Edited by A10shun on Wednesday 13th of December 2017 07:38:01 PM
Caralho said
Dec 13, 2017
Aqfyn3st wrote:
Notice of examination stated 70. You can create any scenario you like but its what they mentioned and its what you signed for and fingerprinted to. I will try to get a better accurate info Friday.
Throw outs ??
Aqfyn3st said
Dec 13, 2017
One and double answers were already handled during protest.
doowee58 said
Dec 13, 2017
U mean 40 people from 2017 list???
Rover357 said
Dec 13, 2017
Number is about 2640. Whoever told you less than 1300 gave you bad info.
HanginByAThread said
Dec 13, 2017
This list better be out hy friday or im gonna lose my mind.
Aqfyn3st said
Dec 13, 2017
Rover357 wrote:
Number is about 2640. Whoever told you less than 1300 gave you bad info.
Why stop at 2640 lets make it 3640. 10 throw outs and 7 double answers.
IamTheLaw said
Dec 13, 2017
Aqfyn3st wrote:
Rover357 wrote:
Number is about 2640. Whoever told you less than 1300 gave you bad info.
Why stop at 2640 lets make it 3640. 10 throw outs and 7 double answers.
Way to be dismissive and condescending at the same time. You're gonna be one helluva a sgt. I heard the same thing as Rover and I'm not calling you CNN. You could be right for all I know. I could be wrong. But something tells me that you didn't actually see the list and are just going off what was already public information. You say that there is 1 throw out and 2 double answers that where reflected on the protest. That's a little suspicous. I guess they were just twiddling there thumbs during the TVB. I know for a fact that there were more throwouts than that. I also know people personally who said they verified vet points with a 65. I'm no mathmaticion but ai know 70 - 3 isnt 65. Also you are the same guy who said you'd sue if passing was below a 70, so I feel like you're being a little biased. But what do I know. I guess we'll all find out soon.
-- Edited by IamTheLaw on Wednesday 13th of December 2017 10:08:14 PM
Caralho said
Dec 13, 2017
IamTheLaw wrote:
Aqfyn3st wrote:
Rover357 wrote:
Number is about 2640. Whoever told you less than 1300 gave you bad info.
Why stop at 2640 lets make it 3640. 10 throw outs and 7 double answers.
Way to be dismissive and condescending at the same time. You're gonna be one helluva a sgt. I heard the same thing as Rover and I'm not calling you CNN. You could be right for all I know. I could be wrong. But something tells me that you didn't actually see the list and are just going off what was already public information. You say that there is 1 throw out and 2 double answers that where reflected on the protest. That's a little suspicous. I guess they were just twiddling there thumbs during the TVB. I know for a fact that there were more throwouts than that. I also know people personally who said they verified vet points with a 65. I'm no mathmaticion but ai know 70 - 3 isnt 65. Also you are the same guy who said you'd sue if passing was below a 70, so I feel like you're being a little biased. But what do I know. I guess we'll all find out soon.
Nice..
-- Edited by IamTheLaw on Wednesday 13th of December 2017 10:08:14 PM
JDMEVO9 said
Dec 14, 2017
Caballo Loco wrote:
That comment basically shot down any credibility you had on this site.
Moving on!
You think I care about your opinion ?
transit cops dont even know how to handle a PAR without requesting a patrol Sector
and you want to listen to MANY articles that have suggested the same **** with the contract
when the SBA has DIRECTLY stated the opposite of that article. SBA meetings or News Article ?
im caling Out NONSENSE. This is America, you want to believe the article cold heartedly thats on you
you CANNOT just alter a contract because some Vaginas will be Hurt. 250 Sergeants benefitting means NOTHING on a scale of
hundreds of millions of dollars. The article Comforts Haters..
BlastLivesMatter said
Dec 14, 2017
JDMEVO9 wrote:
Caballo Loco wrote:
That comment basically shot down any credibility you had on this site.
Moving on!
You think I care about your opinion ?
transit cops dont even know how to handle a PAR without requesting a patrol Sector
Because a PAR makes you a real cop lol, meanwhile you have transit cops solo, no partner in the 73/67/47 holding down their posts making stops for TOS yeah whatever it is what it is, but no they arent real cops? I was never in transit but I respect what they do. And besides werent you in Narco or Vice? Yeah because theyre real detectives, collaring skells for stems and doing B&B, locking some chick who offered a handjob for 20 dollars lol, meanwhile Gang Detectives running cases from the ground up doing take downs on entire crews, gun rips. handing out man years like its candy. Stop trying to sh!t on cops who do their job.
-- Edited by BlastLivesMatter on Thursday 14th of December 2017 04:01:33 AM
-- Edited by BlastLivesMatter on Thursday 14th of December 2017 04:02:43 AM
-- Edited by BlastLivesMatter on Thursday 14th of December 2017 04:58:12 AM
Aqfyn3st said
Dec 14, 2017
If you guys are done fighting....
Yesterday was the last CARB for 2013 waiting to be promoted...can anyone else confirm this?
TooSucio4u said
Dec 14, 2017
Gangs is a glorified Crime Team and Narco a is gloried SNEU team we all know that lol
AND Transit is where the money is at. Dont hate the player hate the game
StillAtTheBottom said
Dec 14, 2017
So let me put this out there for everyone coming up with bizzare information. There was 2 throwout questions( the Dv question & the comstat math question) i dont know what the double answer questions are but there is 3 of them. The list is in NYPD hands and is awaiting the PC signature, it should be out Friday or The lastest Tuesday by 1730 the latest. There is a class going in Jan 2 of 40 with 14 holdovers from the 2013 test. The list under 1300 ppl and the job is currently down 162 Sgts citywide.
Thebirds said
Dec 14, 2017
What was wrong with the math question?
StillAtTheBottom said
Dec 14, 2017
The math questioin was thrown Out because the test was suppose to be original be in Oct of 2016 so the years of the comparison on the comstat sheet in the inbasket was 2016/2015 but the since we took the test In February 2017 they was supposed to be 2017/2016. I know its a petty reason but hey its an extra point and wasnt much question to throw out cus the test was stra foward
BlastLivesMatter said
Dec 14, 2017
StillAtTheBottom wrote:
The math questioin was thrown Out because the test was suppose to be original be in Oct of 2016 so the years of the comparison on the comstat sheet in the inbasket was 2016/2015 but the since we took the test In February 2017 they was supposed to be 2017/2016. I know its a petty reason but hey its an extra point and wasnt much question to throw out cus the test was stra foward
Lmfaooo yeah okay
Caralho said
Dec 14, 2017
BlastLivesMatter wrote:
StillAtTheBottom wrote:
The math questioin was thrown Out because the test was suppose to be original be in Oct of 2016 so the years of the comparison on the comstat sheet in the inbasket was 2016/2015 but the since we took the test In February 2017 they was supposed to be 2017/2016. I know its a petty reason but hey its an extra point and wasnt much question to throw out cus the test was stra foward
Lmfaooo yeah okay
Who is this guy??
Caralho said
Dec 14, 2017
BlastLivesMatter wrote:
StillAtTheBottom wrote:
The math questioin was thrown Out because the test was suppose to be original be in Oct of 2016 so the years of the comparison on the comstat sheet in the inbasket was 2016/2015 but the since we took the test In February 2017 they was supposed to be 2017/2016. I know its a petty reason but hey its an extra point and wasnt much question to throw out cus the test was stra foward
Lmfaooo yeah okay
What was the answer to the math question
Noice said
Dec 14, 2017
StillAtTheBottom wrote:
The math questioin was thrown Out because the test was suppose to be original be in Oct of 2016 so the years of the comparison on the comstat sheet in the inbasket was 2016/2015 but the since we took the test In February 2017 they was supposed to be 2017/2016. I know its a petty reason but hey its an extra point and wasnt much question to throw out cus the test was stra foward
This is true
HanginByAThread said
Dec 14, 2017
I wasnt going to post it for specific reasons. Stillatthebottom is correct. Laugh at him all you want that is spot on !
The three double answers are also questions no one discussed here. The only throwout that we discussed on the boards was the family question.
-- Edited by HanginByAThread on Thursday 14th of December 2017 02:02:53 PM
So69isntgood said
Dec 14, 2017
So basically no one is getting that point because I dont know anyone who got that wrong.... maybe if they forgot their calculator at home on test day maybe
-- Edited by JDMEVO9 on Tuesday 12th of December 2017 10:50:40 AM
I would never reveal a source either so I fully agree with ya. That being said, There is alot of smoke to what you've been saying. That leads me to believe that there is a fire. I mean you're a senior member of this sight with no reason to troll us. I know someone who claims to have seen the list and said it was huge. That lines up with what you've been saying about people pass failing. I also was told by someone I know and trust that he was told there would be some kind of curve (still skeptical about it being an actual curve and assuming it's a mass amount of throwouts). It took ten months and this list hasn't dropped. Original passers goes from 700s to 1200s to 1400s to over 2000s. With all signs pointing to you being onto something. The 61 curve does line up with the 2600 person list. Sooooo I'm gonna say eff it and hop onto the carpet and trust ya! Lol. But if it all comes crashing down that's on you.
Nice.
You were right Jay. Just heard from the academy. Class is delayed indefinitely.
If it's out by Friday, I'll bend the Knee!
I used to be hopeful like you, till I took an arrow in the knee
Guys and gals. Believe in the Brat.
Ok no one will be at top pay a year later, they will be frozen at that Step till they reach top pay. Dont believe me? Take a look
A quirk in the Patrolmens Benevolent Association contract reached in late January that meant members of that union who were subsequently promoted from Police Officer to Sergeant faced a pay cut led the de Blasio administration to temporarily upgrade salary for the new promotees.
Straight to Step 4
In doing so, however, the city had to promote them to the fourth step on the pay scale for Sergeants, meaning they would also be receiving more in base pay during their first year in that rank than those who had reached it three years ago. Although they will be frozen at that step on the pay scale for their first four years in the rank, the move has stirred resentment among some other Sergeants who have not yet reached maximum pay, and prompted talk among them of bringing a lawsuit.
Article: http://thechiefleader.com/news/open_articles/new-nypd-sergeants-temporarily-earning-more-than--yr-vets/article_dd3d83fa-8688-11e7-9f06-eb9f16191da7.html
Dude your wrong
that article is outdated
when the co tract first hit that was the assumptions
when the cops were sworn and promoted to sergeant
they jumped some steps and will be going to top pay in June 2018.
you cannot say OOPS, this benefits OR DOESNT benefit certain members
you can only make FUTURE CHANGES.
its not a Scratch 61 where you can just Fuukk with a contract and change what benefits someone
new hires wont get So lucky
The article is not old, it's from September. And if the NYC Labor commissioner says that those sgts will be at 3rd step for 4 yrs, I'd believe that Over anyone else.
And when the sgts do stay at 3rd step, do you think the sba will start an expensive lawsuit against the city just for 2% of their membership?
-- Edited by TransitJoe on Wednesday 13th of December 2017 04:07:51 PM
Transit arent real cops
they never know anything
nontheless difference between opinion and facts
go back in the hole
That comment basically shot down any credibility you had on this site.
Moving on!
Whats the final passing?
If you guys want to see for yourselves what I am saying, look at the 2013 Sgts exam on the top left of the first page. Printed by dcas at 1700 hours on one day then STAMPED by 10am the next morning by the department and leaked by the afternoon.
We shall see in the next coming days if this news is accurate.
Your absolutely right!
But whats the number of passers? Do you know?
I think that he meant that the passing number is 70. Not that he knows the number of passers.
So this person on here claiming to have people verify vet points with 65 s and a big List is a fraud..??
If its true that is.
About 40 people from 2016 list will be on it. Subject to change. But doubt it
This is regarding the January class
-- Edited by A10shun on Wednesday 13th of December 2017 07:38:01 PM
Throw outs ??
U mean 40 people from 2017 list???
Number is about 2640. Whoever told you less than 1300 gave you bad info.
Why stop at 2640 lets make it 3640. 10 throw outs and 7 double answers.
Way to be dismissive and condescending at the same time. You're gonna be one helluva a sgt. I heard the same thing as Rover and I'm not calling you CNN. You could be right for all I know. I could be wrong. But something tells me that you didn't actually see the list and are just going off what was already public information. You say that there is 1 throw out and 2 double answers that where reflected on the protest. That's a little suspicous. I guess they were just twiddling there thumbs during the TVB. I know for a fact that there were more throwouts than that. I also know people personally who said they verified vet points with a 65. I'm no mathmaticion but ai know 70 - 3 isnt 65. Also you are the same guy who said you'd sue if passing was below a 70, so I feel like you're being a little biased. But what do I know. I guess we'll all find out soon.
-- Edited by IamTheLaw on Wednesday 13th of December 2017 10:08:14 PM
You think I care about your opinion ?
transit cops dont even know how to handle a PAR without requesting a patrol Sector
and you want to listen to MANY articles that have suggested the same **** with the contract
when the SBA has DIRECTLY stated the opposite of that article. SBA meetings or News Article ?
im caling Out NONSENSE. This is America, you want to believe the article cold heartedly thats on you
you CANNOT just alter a contract because some Vaginas will be Hurt. 250 Sergeants benefitting means NOTHING on a scale of
hundreds of millions of dollars. The article Comforts Haters..
Because a PAR makes you a real cop lol, meanwhile you have transit cops solo, no partner in the 73/67/47 holding down their posts making stops for TOS yeah whatever it is what it is, but no they arent real cops? I was never in transit but I respect what they do. And besides werent you in Narco or Vice? Yeah because theyre real detectives, collaring skells for stems and doing B&B, locking some chick who offered a handjob for 20 dollars lol, meanwhile Gang Detectives running cases from the ground up doing take downs on entire crews, gun rips. handing out man years like its candy. Stop trying to sh!t on cops who do their job.
-- Edited by BlastLivesMatter on Thursday 14th of December 2017 04:01:33 AM
-- Edited by BlastLivesMatter on Thursday 14th of December 2017 04:02:43 AM
-- Edited by BlastLivesMatter on Thursday 14th of December 2017 04:58:12 AM
Yesterday was the last CARB for 2013 waiting to be promoted...can anyone else confirm this?
AND Transit is where the money is at. Dont hate the player hate the game
The math questioin was thrown Out because the test was suppose to be original be in Oct of 2016 so the years of the comparison on the comstat sheet in the inbasket was 2016/2015 but the since we took the test In February 2017 they was supposed to be 2017/2016. I know its a petty reason but hey its an extra point and wasnt much question to throw out cus the test was stra foward
Lmfaooo yeah okay
Who is this guy??
What was the answer to the math question
This is true
I wasnt going to post it for specific reasons. Stillatthebottom is correct. Laugh at him all you want that is spot on !
The three double answers are also questions no one discussed here. The only throwout that we discussed on the boards was the family question.
-- Edited by HanginByAThread on Thursday 14th of December 2017 02:02:53 PM