Check your email for your score. It seems DCAS is sending the emails out right before their holiday weekend. Hopefully we can all enjoy the Labor Day weekend festivities together!

Helloall wrote:

---

I didnt get mine either but I heard a lot people failed and Tremendously

---

 most people fail every time a test comes out.

it sounds cold but the reality is that most people don't put in the work to pass.

i'd say on average 10k take the test and approximately 2k usually pass

Swayyzeee wrote:

---

69

---

 R U serious? :o

Lmaooo Yeap. Ofcourse Id get a 69. 

Same... 69 

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

I havent received
An email yet, anyone in the same boat ?

---

 Neither do I. one from my command got his score this morning at 6 oclock. he passed.

countryroads wrote:

---

Lol 20% of people selecting 95+ in the poll?

---

 People are just selecting that so they can look at the poll. Like I couldn't see the poll so I picked failed, even though I didn't take the test.

NoCD wrote:

---

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

I havent received
An email yet, anyone in the same boat ?

---

 Neither do I. one from my command got his score this morning at 6 oclock. he passed.

---

 Okay cool still waiting , nothing yet smh

497CRUSADERS wrote:

---

Got my email 85. Thank you Mike Yanosik and Rising Star for pushing me thru.

---

 Mike 4 lyfe. 

61 smh

Praying for a curve

Msterdan8 wrote:

---

Do yall think a 94 (longevity included) will be eligible for the lt exam?

---

 i dont think so, promotions wont start until late next year...

if they push the lt test back thats a different story...

Msterdan8 wrote:

---

Do yall think a 94 (longevity included) will be eligible for the lt exam?

---

 Nope. First promotions are usually 9 months from the test or so. 

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

It looks like a lot of ppl unfortunately failed
There goes the day 2 debacle put to rest.
How many questions will be thrown out do you guys think?

---

 Hoping at least 10 plus a curve

If you study you'll be sitting comfortably waiting for your promotion. Those that took it day 2 and thought otherwise since most failed after the cheating scandal Good luck and nice work!

Papi825 wrote:

---

Studied very hard, got a 83 raw score. Dont have much seniority, will finish with an 85.5 without any throw outs. Lets see how long itll take me to get promoted. Interested to see how big this list will be.

---

If you study you'll be sitting comfortably waiting for your promotion. Those that took it day 2 and thought otherwise since most failed after the cheating scandal. Good luck and nice work!

eightleft wrote:

---

Msterdan8 wrote:

---

Do yall think a 94 (longevity included) will be eligible for the lt exam?

---

 i dont think so, promotions wont start until late next year...

if they push the lt test back thats a different story...

---

 Highly unlikely they push back the LT exam, as the current LT list expires in the summer.

It's still up in the air whether the first bmoc class from this exam will make it in time to sit for the LT exam. Possible but unlikely.

I agree. I studied all of mikes material religiously. I could practically teach a class but got a 69. This test was trash. Not a single investigative encounters question. Math question. 1 BS BWC question. I feel like if we took the 2017 exam we wouldve faired better.

Swayyzeee wrote:

---

I agree. I studied all of mikes material religiously. I could practically teach a class but got a 69. This test was trash. Not a single investigative encounters question. Math question. 1 BS BWC question. I feel like if we took the 2017 exam we wouldve faired better.

---

 Idk if you took it day 1 or 2 but they did go to investigative encounters 

but the question was mixed with investigative encounter/transit in the stem

i do agree with BWC, the way mike went so hard lol I would have expected more. That should be more of a 3-4 shield not 5

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

Swayyzeee wrote:

---

I agree. I studied all of mikes material religiously. I could practically teach a class but got a 69. This test was trash. Not a single investigative encounters question. Math question. 1 BS BWC question. I feel like if we took the 2017 exam we wouldve faired better.

---

 Idk if you took it day 1 or 2 but they did go to investigative encounters  

but the question was mixed with investigative encounter/transit in the stem

 i do agree with BWC, the way mike went so hard lol I would have expected more. That should be more of a 3-4 shield not 5

---

 Mike tends to teach new, important material with emphasis. During the 2017 Sgt test prep, he went pretty in-depth on TRIs. I believe there was two questions on TRIs. Same with the 2015 Lt test, he pretty much thought the entire test would be on CIMS. i dont know how many questions there were but it was not many. Unfortunately it takes going your first test to understand the ins and outs. I was fortunate to pass the 2017 test and have implemented my own study method. While I do pay attention to Mikes system, every procedure must be read so youre at least familiar with it. 

and they always ask a math question (related to COMPSTAT). 

in retrospect, I wonder if people would have preferred the in-basket?

100questions wrote:

---

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

Swayyzeee wrote:

---

I agree. I studied all of mikes material religiously. I could practically teach a class but got a 69. This test was trash. Not a single investigative encounters question. Math question. 1 BS BWC question. I feel like if we took the 2017 exam we wouldve faired better.

---

 Idk if you took it day 1 or 2 but they did go to investigative encounters  

but the question was mixed with investigative encounter/transit in the stem

 i do agree with BWC, the way mike went so hard lol I would have expected more. That should be more of a 3-4 shield not 5

---

 Mike tends to teach new, important material with emphasis. During the 2017 Sgt test prep, he went pretty in-depth on TRIs. I believe there was two questions on TRIs. Same with the 2015 Lt test, he pretty much thought the entire test would be on CIMS. i dont know how many questions there were but it was not many. Unfortunately it takes going your first test to understand the ins and outs. I was fortunate to pass the 2017 test and have implemented my own study method. While I do pay attention to Mikes system, every procedure must be read so youre at least familiar with it. 

and they always ask a math question (related to COMPSTAT). 

in retrospect, I wonder if people would have preferred the in-basket?

---

There was zero math question on this sgt exam

and I agree with  you, I am happy to have come out with an 80, but I will study differently for LT

RamJamFlamSong wrote:

---

I received a raw score of 89.

---

 Wow thats nice , how much time

do you have OTJ?

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

100questions wrote:

---

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

Swayyzeee wrote:

---

I agree. I studied all of mikes material religiously. I could practically teach a class but got a 69. This test was trash. Not a single investigative encounters question. Math question. 1 BS BWC question. I feel like if we took the 2017 exam we wouldve faired better.

---

 Idk if you took it day 1 or 2 but they did go to investigative encounters  

but the question was mixed with investigative encounter/transit in the stem

 i do agree with BWC, the way mike went so hard lol I would have expected more. That should be more of a 3-4 shield not 5

---

 Mike tends to teach new, important material with emphasis. During the 2017 Sgt test prep, he went pretty in-depth on TRIs. I believe there was two questions on TRIs. Same with the 2015 Lt test, he pretty much thought the entire test would be on CIMS. i dont know how many questions there were but it was not many. Unfortunately it takes going your first test to understand the ins and outs. I was fortunate to pass the 2017 test and have implemented my own study method. While I do pay attention to Mikes system, every procedure must be read so youre at least familiar with it. 

and they always ask a math question (related to COMPSTAT). 

in retrospect, I wonder if people would have preferred the in-basket?

---

There was zero math question on this sgt exam

and I agree with  you, I am happy to have come out with an 80, but I will study differently for LT

---

 Nice job. For the next test, using rising star questions in addition to a school is an incredibly wise move. Also, make sure you know historically tested procedures to the point where you can practically recite them line by line, and you're g2g.

100questions wrote:

---

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

Swayyzeee wrote:

---

I agree. I studied all of mikes material religiously. I could practically teach a class but got a 69. This test was trash. Not a single investigative encounters question. Math question. 1 BS BWC question. I feel like if we took the 2017 exam we wouldve faired better.

---

 Idk if you took it day 1 or 2 but they did go to investigative encounters  

but the question was mixed with investigative encounter/transit in the stem

 i do agree with BWC, the way mike went so hard lol I would have expected more. That should be more of a 3-4 shield not 5

---

 Mike tends to teach new, important material with emphasis. During the 2017 Sgt test prep, he went pretty in-depth on TRIs. I believe there was two questions on TRIs. Same with the 2015 Lt test, he pretty much thought the entire test would be on CIMS. i dont know how many questions there were but it was not many. Unfortunately it takes going your first test to understand the ins and outs. I was fortunate to pass the 2017 test and have implemented my own study method. While I do pay attention to Mikes system, every procedure must be read so youre at least familiar with it. 

and they always ask a math question (related to COMPSTAT). 

in retrospect, I wonder if people would have preferred the in-basket?

---

 Hell no, only thing I wouldve preferred is a math question 

HopeBoss wrote:

---

I got an 84 but with my points Ill be at an 88.6 so Im hoping for at least 2 throw outs to push me over the top into the 90s. You guys think thats possible ?

---

 Very possible 

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

RamJamFlamSong wrote:

---

I received a raw score of 89.

---

 Wow thats nice , how much time

do you have OTJ?

---

 I'll have ten years in January so I am just shy of full longevity points. I have an average amount of medals as well.

RamJamFlamSong wrote:

---

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

RamJamFlamSong wrote:

---

I received a raw score of 89.

---

 Wow thats nice , how much time

do you have OTJ?

---

 I'll have ten years in January so I am just shy of full longevity points. I have an average amount of medals as well.

---

 Wow congrats man!!

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

RamJamFlamSong wrote:

---

Nypdboss0722 wrote:

---

RamJamFlamSong wrote:

---

I received a raw score of 89.

---

 Wow thats nice , how much time

do you have OTJ?

---

 I'll have ten years in January so I am just shy of full longevity points. I have an average amount of medals as well.

---

 Wow congrats man!!

---

 Thank You