I'm hearing 30 lieutenants for March 29th. It will be interesting to see if anyone gets passed over.
Bklyn net said
Mar 2, 2016
Just wondering can they put in a class even though the protest review session is march 31?
IShredMajors said
Mar 2, 2016
The list has been established and released. The results are final. The protest review will give us a little bit of info but it won't change anything.
bigfoot45 said
Mar 2, 2016
Yes they can. List is established. Nothing can change at the review
Bklyn net said
Mar 2, 2016
Ok thank u
ltexm2015 said
Mar 2, 2016
Ishred....can you tell me where your getting 30 number from?
sixmonthwonder said
Mar 2, 2016
That would be nice, wish it was a bit more, but something is better than nothing.
IShredMajors said
Mar 2, 2016
ltexm2015 wrote:
Ishred....can you tell me where your getting 30 number from?
Not gonna reveal my source but the 30 number is definitely not set in stone, it's too early to know the exact number. I was just starting the thread to see if anyone else has more info than me.
-- Edited by IShredMajors on Wednesday 2nd of March 2016 06:43:33 PM
ltexm2015 said
Mar 2, 2016
Been hearing less....way too early to tell. Bmoc doesn't know yet and no word from personnel
hotshot25 said
Mar 2, 2016
They said last week at the PA that they needed 44
bigfoot45 said
Mar 2, 2016
Who actually makes the decision when to put in a class and how many go in?
Su Madre 24 said
Mar 2, 2016
sixmonthwonder wrote:
That would be nice, wish it was a bit more, but something is better than nothing.
I'm not surprised brother. Even tho theres apparently 50 something vacancies, they gotta slow play this list imo. As we all know...just not enough of you guys on the list.
i think they'll stretch this thing out for about 18 months
sixmonthwonder said
Mar 2, 2016
Su Madre 24 wrote:
sixmonthwonder wrote:
That would be nice, wish it was a bit more, but something is better than nothing.
I'm not surprised brother. Even tho theres apparently 50 something vacancies, they gotta slow play this list imo. As we all know...just not enough of you guys on the list.
i think they'll stretch this thing out for about 18 months
That does sound feasible, but at the same time it would be strange to leave vacancies open just so they can drag the list out. The 2011 list ended in November and they didn't even establish the 2015 list until February. They need to announce a test right now in my opinion though, they should shoot for a November test.
Su Madre 24 said
Mar 2, 2016
sixmonthwonder wrote:
Su Madre 24 wrote:
sixmonthwonder wrote:
That would be nice, wish it was a bit more, but something is better than nothing.
I'm not surprised brother. Even tho theres apparently 50 something vacancies, they gotta slow play this list imo. As we all know...just not enough of you guys on the list.
i think they'll stretch this thing out for about 18 months
That does sound feasible, but at the same time it would be strange to leave vacancies open just so they can drag the list out. The 2011 list ended in November and they didn't even establish the 2015 list until February. They need to announce a test right now in my opinion though, they should shoot for a November test.
From your lips to God's ears!! I WISH they announced it ASAP! But...still think we're on the 2015 timetable: Aug announcement for April test
sixmonthwonder said
Mar 2, 2016
Think they'll almost certainly run out of names on this list then, especially if it takes DCAS a year to release it again. Hopefully it's a fair test this time around, we're due for one.
Cheaterpolice said
Mar 2, 2016
I wonder what's going to happen. Would be nice of the job did the right thing for once and passed over the makeup people
sixmonthwonder said
Mar 3, 2016
If they wanted to do the right thing they would curve the test so everyone above 65 made the list. They don't care.
bigfoot45 said
Mar 7, 2016
Does anyone know any details about a class this month?
johnnybigtime said
Mar 7, 2016
Class on the 29th. Numbers keep changing from around 20 down to 12. They want to stretch this list 18 months.
Su Madre 24 said
Mar 7, 2016
johnnybigtime wrote:
Class on the 29th. Numbers keep changing from around 20 down to 12. They want to stretch this list 18 months.
Thanks for the info for BT. Have you heard any rumors about the next test? Everyone prob still expects an August announcement for April 2017.
johnnybigtime said
Mar 7, 2016
Sorry nothing about the next test.
bigfoot45 said
Mar 7, 2016
johnnybigtime wrote:
Class on the 29th. Numbers keep changing from around 20 down to 12. They want to stretch this list 18 months.
Wow, that makes a lot of sense. We will run on a Lt deficit for 18 months instead of 3 to 6 months. Dopes
Devil Dog said
Mar 7, 2016
Thx Johnny.
sixmonthwonder said
Mar 7, 2016
bigfoot45 wrote:
johnnybigtime wrote:
Class on the 29th. Numbers keep changing from around 20 down to 12. They want to stretch this list 18 months.
Wow, that makes a lot of sense. We will run on a Lt deficit for 18 months instead of 3 to 6 months. Dopes
Yeah, if they want to make it last they could put in 50 now and wait three or four months before they put in a second class. Not surprised though, NYPD logic.
rockets said
Mar 10, 2016
Confirmed class of ~20 Lieutenants getting promoted on the 29th
Bklyn net said
Mar 10, 2016
How does it work i know sgt classes u get promoted at the end They get called for ID cards and shields two days before ? I know they get promoted up front
ltexm2015 said
Mar 10, 2016
promotions 29th....id cards prob wed/thurs the week prior
Bklyn net said
Mar 10, 2016
THanks
Nypd 1234 said
Mar 10, 2016
Only 20. Wtf.
Windeast said
Mar 11, 2016
i say they announce another exam this april for november, hoping to expedite this list now and skip over the scammers being investigated so that way they can exhaust the list and start a new one with less scammers.
Devil Dog said
Mar 11, 2016
Windeast wrote:
i say they announce another exam this april for november, hoping to expedite this list now and skip over the scammers being investigated so that way they can exhaust the list and start a new one with less scammers.
From your lips to God's ears...
TransitSucks said
Mar 11, 2016
no one is going to admit they cheated.
sixmonthwonder said
Mar 11, 2016
TransitSucks wrote:
no one is going to admit they cheated.
I've heard some already have. Hard to risk your job when there's evidence against you.
Most will be in the clear, but for some there is already a case that they cheated.
ltexm2015 said
Mar 14, 2016
Id expect to see I'd card notifications come down next monday
bigfoot45 said
Mar 14, 2016
Any confirmation on the number of promotions this month?
Wheresthelist said
Mar 14, 2016
26 on the 29th
DETSGT said
Mar 14, 2016
Just heard the same. 26 Lt's no capt's
Wheresthelist said
Mar 14, 2016
No sgts no capts
skiguy37 said
Mar 14, 2016
Wow. We will find out real soon how serious the department is taking the cheating scandal.
Slate said
Mar 14, 2016
Thanks whereathelist, any word on the makeups?
Nypd 1234 said
Mar 14, 2016
How many of these cheaters will be passed over?
wereinbacklog said
Mar 14, 2016
Nypd 1234 wrote:
How many of these cheaters will be passed over?
24
skiguy37 said
Mar 14, 2016
wereinbacklog wrote:
Nypd 1234 wrote:
How many of these cheaters will be passed over?
24
Are you serious?
EddieFrank said
Mar 14, 2016
Are we sure this for an investigation and not because people don't have the time or credits?
IShredMajors said
Mar 14, 2016
wereinbacklog wrote:
Nypd 1234 wrote:
How many of these cheaters will be passed over?
24
wereinbacklog said
Mar 14, 2016
skiguy37 wrote:
wereinbacklog wrote:
Nypd 1234 wrote:
How many of these cheaters will be passed over?
24
Are you serious?
That's what I was told.
Wheresthelist said
Mar 14, 2016
Slate wrote:
Thanks whereathelist, any word on the makeups?
I dont have any info regarding this sorry.
Boogie Knight said
Mar 15, 2016
skiguy37 wrote:
Wow. We will find out real soon how serious the department is taking the cheating scandal.
There was no cheating involved with this exam.
Scenario: Taker taker A takes exam on April 18 and test taker B takes exam months later.
if test taker A wants to tell test taker B everything that was on the exam, he can. at this point, it is an issue of competitiveness.
There is no code of silence or contract anyone signed that restricts people from talking or listening after a test is given. Even that piece of sh!t that was allegedly outside of the school asking people what was on the exam is not cheating. A piece of sh!t, yes, but not a cheater.
Taker A can keep quiet to keep his/her advantage. Hence, competition.
Cheating occurs if both test takers when taking it at the same time and pass notes, give signals, text each other, etc. as the test is being administered. OR if the hard copy itself is provided to the test takers in advance of the exam is administered, that's cheating too.
it is what it is. As much as I myself hate to admit it, the holy observers/military/etc. have only the classic case of, Don't Hate The Player, Hate The Game.
-- Edited by Boogie Knight on Tuesday 15th of March 2016 01:04:08 AM
soccerpsyco32 said
Mar 15, 2016
^^^^ Yes. But said conduct may still be "prejudicial to the good order and discipline of the Department". There's a reason they have these type of "catch all" administrative charges, and this type of bullsh!t could absolutely be covered under that charge.
Slate said
Mar 15, 2016
Boogie Knight wrote:
skiguy37 wrote:
Wow. We will find out real soon how serious the department is taking the cheating scandal.
There was no cheating involved with this exam.
Scenario: Taker taker A takes exam on April 18 and test taker B takes exam months later.
if test taker A wants to tell test taker B everything that was on the exam, he can. at this point, it is an issue of competitiveness.
There is no code of silence or contract anyone signed that restricts people from talking or listening after a test is given. Even that piece of sh!t that was allegedly outside of the school asking people what was on the exam is not cheating. A piece of sh!t, yes, but not a cheater.
Taker A can keep quiet to keep his/her advantage. Hence, competition.
Cheating occurs if both test takers when taking it at the same time and pass notes, give signals, text each other, etc. as the test is being administered. OR if the hard copy itself is provided to the test takers in advance of the exam is administered, that's cheating too.
it is what it is. As much as I myself hate to admit it, the holy observers/military/etc. have only the classic case of, Don't Hate The Player, Hate The Game.
-- Edited by Boogie Knight on Tuesday 15th of March 2016 01:04:08 AM
Interesting PERSONAL definition of cheating. Unfortunately you missed the part that says acting unfairly in order to gain advantage. Knowing the questions word for word before you take your makeup that were obtained after the protest session falls in that category. You dont need any codes of silence/contracts to act unfairly.....
I'm hearing 30 lieutenants for March 29th. It will be interesting to see if anyone gets passed over.
The list has been established and released. The results are final. The protest review will give us a little bit of info but it won't change anything.
Yes they can. List is established. Nothing can change at the review
Not gonna reveal my source but the 30 number is definitely not set in stone, it's too early to know the exact number. I was just starting the thread to see if anyone else has more info than me.
-- Edited by IShredMajors on Wednesday 2nd of March 2016 06:43:33 PM
They said last week at the PA that they needed 44
Who actually makes the decision when to put in a class and how many go in?
I'm not surprised brother. Even tho theres apparently 50 something vacancies, they gotta slow play this list imo. As we all know...just not enough of you guys on the list.
i think they'll stretch this thing out for about 18 months
That does sound feasible, but at the same time it would be strange to leave vacancies open just so they can drag the list out. The 2011 list ended in November and they didn't even establish the 2015 list until February. They need to announce a test right now in my opinion though, they should shoot for a November test.
From your lips to God's ears!! I WISH they announced it ASAP! But...still think we're on the 2015 timetable: Aug announcement for April test
If they wanted to do the right thing they would curve the test so everyone above 65 made the list. They don't care.
Does anyone know any details about a class this month?
Thanks for the info for BT. Have you heard any rumors about the next test? Everyone prob still expects an August announcement for April 2017.
Wow, that makes a lot of sense. We will run on a Lt deficit for 18 months instead of 3 to 6 months. Dopes
Thx Johnny.
Yeah, if they want to make it last they could put in 50 now and wait three or four months before they put in a second class. Not surprised though, NYPD logic.
From your lips to God's ears...
I've heard some already have. Hard to risk your job when there's evidence against you.
Most will be in the clear, but for some there is already a case that they cheated.
Any confirmation on the number of promotions this month?
24
Are you serious?
That's what I was told.
I dont have any info regarding this sorry.
There was no cheating involved with this exam.
Scenario: Taker taker A takes exam on April 18 and test taker B takes exam months later.
if test taker A wants to tell test taker B everything that was on the exam, he can. at this point, it is an issue of competitiveness.
There is no code of silence or contract anyone signed that restricts people from talking or listening after a test is given. Even that piece of sh!t that was allegedly outside of the school asking people what was on the exam is not cheating. A piece of sh!t, yes, but not a cheater.
Taker A can keep quiet to keep his/her advantage. Hence, competition.
Cheating occurs if both test takers when taking it at the same time and pass notes, give signals, text each other, etc. as the test is being administered. OR if the hard copy itself is provided to the test takers in advance of the exam is administered, that's cheating too.
it is what it is. As much as I myself hate to admit it, the holy observers/military/etc. have only the classic case of, Don't Hate The Player, Hate The Game.
-- Edited by Boogie Knight on Tuesday 15th of March 2016 01:04:08 AM
Interesting PERSONAL definition of cheating. Unfortunately you missed the part that says acting unfairly in order to gain advantage. Knowing the questions word for word before you take your makeup that were obtained after the protest session falls in that category. You dont need any codes of silence/contracts to act unfairly.....