I say 500. This is because many that are freaking out were probably looking between an 80 to 95 on a typical Lieutenant test. Now you will have between a 70 and 85. This test will
eliminate the test taker that wasnt completely dedicated.
hollar said
Oct 30, 2011
Disagree... One didn't have to study hard for six months for this test
PatrolGuideismyBible said
Oct 30, 2011
Yes, even the patrol guide questions were very tricky and inconsistent in many of the fact patterns. Someone who knew the PG cold could still get a lot of them wrong bc the fact patterns and the choices were vague...
RISING IDIOT said
Oct 30, 2011
hollar wrote:
Disagree... One didn't have to study hard for six months for this test
I am starting to think the same thing.....P.S. I am one of the idiots that dedicated 6 months of his life to studying
occbsux said
Oct 30, 2011
100-250 depending on the throwouts.
NYG37 said
Oct 30, 2011
I think there will be easy 500-600 people passing the scores won't be as high though. I'm just hoping for a bare minimum of 70%.
OkeeDokee said
Oct 30, 2011
Most P.G. questions were of the "trick variety." Studying helped, albeit not much. The PAR question was a set-up.
E D said
Oct 30, 2011
What was up with Uniform question, I tbought 2 people were ok? Also the Truck & bus supplemental, I didn't even see the right answer as a choice and I know that procedure well
-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:08:15 PM
infinity said
Oct 30, 2011
I thought the tattoo guy and hair clip girl were good to go. What was the wrong voucher? Money or phone?
E D said
Oct 30, 2011
They asked 4 good voucher didn't they? I put marijuana was good one
Y i thought they were both good too.
-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:13:24 PM
infinity said
Oct 30, 2011
Truck and bus I put 1 par and don't use the marker.
infinity said
Oct 30, 2011
I put the phone. The marijuana threw me off with the FTP? I thought that meant field test positive. But it should be POS
E D said
Oct 30, 2011
It's supp to be 2 truck & bus supplaments and no marker, but that wasnt a choice, WTF!
-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:15:44 PM
wereinbacklog said
Oct 30, 2011
They asked which voucher was good for signing off
counterfeit voucher= bad counterfeit usc doesn't vouchered
firearm voucher= bad round from chamber was itemized 2nd
cellphone vouchered = bad it was vouchered as safekeeping should be arrest evidence
marihuana= good
wereinbacklog said
Oct 30, 2011
The 204 question the answer was the tatoo guy that came out in 2010, he doesn't have to carry the letter on his person
occbsux said
Oct 30, 2011
Marijuana was missing the complaint number.
MN50 said
Oct 30, 2011
Wasn't it the gun voucher that was wrong
E D said
Oct 30, 2011
So what was wrong with the girl with the small brown hair clip
wereinbacklog said
Oct 30, 2011
It didn't ask which one was wrong it asked which one was good for signing.
MN50 said
Oct 30, 2011
None of the vouchers had a 61#
infinity said
Oct 30, 2011
It didn't meet the criteria for the supplement. Nobody was transported for medical or any cars towed
MN50 said
Oct 30, 2011
I thought the brown clip girl was good
wereinbacklog said
Oct 30, 2011
I didn't see what was wrong with the girl with the hair clip but the most correct to me was the the umos with the approval of the co and wasn't carrying the letter.
sig226 said
Oct 30, 2011
For par question it's one supplement. and no reference markers for bridges/tunnels
E D said
Oct 30, 2011
Yes the truck was towed for other than flat tire v
MN50 said
Oct 30, 2011
Negative, the truck was towed for a defect
infinity said
Oct 30, 2011
They called a tow. Didn't say it was towed
E D said
Oct 30, 2011
Can't bebone supp, comm vehicle over 10000 lbs, and other vehicle had hazmat placard
wereinbacklog said
Oct 30, 2011
The Traffic Agent question about harrasment the answer was (49 addressed to Chief of Patrol) it should be chief of transportation.
sig226 said
Oct 30, 2011
In uniform must have a letter.
wereinbacklog said
Oct 30, 2011
The accident question stated that a tow truck was called but not that the vehicle was removed from the scene, therefore no supplement
E D said
Oct 30, 2011
Uniform, double answer, par throw out. That's my opinion
sig226 said
Oct 30, 2011
Exactly. That vehicle was over 10000 something plus the driver had injury and his suv had hazmat plaque
wereinbacklog said
Oct 30, 2011
sig226 wrote:
In uniform must have a letter.
U do not need a letter if the reason is for a tatoo and approved by d co. The PG states it goes in ur personal folder and doesn't have to be carried.
E D said
Oct 30, 2011
Backlog are u serious? Can't be. If a tie truck was called the car was towed
wereinbacklog said
Oct 30, 2011
sig226 wrote:
Exactly. That vehicle was over 10000 something plus the driver had injury and his suv had hazmat plaque
the driver had injury but not removed from the scene
infinity said
Oct 30, 2011
He was treated at the scene. Even tho they requested a tow, no car was removed. No doa. No supplement! And I'm sticking too it lol
OkeeDokee said
Oct 30, 2011
sig226 wrote:
In uniform must have a letter.
Where does it say that anywhere?It should be in personnel folder.
Also, the truck & bus question---the car had a biohard plaque.
How about the ammended PAR question? It says in the P.G. to refer them with leaving the scene cases, but it also says give them a MV104 if they don't qualify for MV104an
-- Edited by OkeeDokee on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:25:52 PM
-- Edited by OkeeDokee on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:27:28 PM
E D said
Oct 30, 2011
Right, tattoo app by Co don't carry letter, goes in ur folder. But the girls hair was ok too. That's why I say it's a double.
sig226 said
Oct 30, 2011
Operation safe store dropped it big time((gotta call detective bureau duty captain. not co/duty capt What about that retarded one with exploded dye pack...they wanted 2 procedures and none was indicated in answer choices
wereinbacklog said
Oct 30, 2011
E D wrote:
Backlog are u serious? Can't be. If a tie truck was called the car was towed
The question came down to two choices (Eliminate 2 since the reference marker will not be used accident occured on a bridge). Both stated one par, and not include d reference marker, but one said no supplement and the other stated one supplement. If in fact the supplement should be done then it should be two (placard, 22k lbs) instead of one.
-- Edited by wereinbacklog on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:26:07 PM
MN50 said
Oct 30, 2011
It's supposed to be a commercial truck over ten k, the truck in question was a rental, the guy was treated at the scene, for it to qualify injury had to be fatal or he had to be immediately transported to hospital, the suv with the placard was the only vehicle that qualified. And I think when they requested the tow for the defect it inferred the truck was towed
E D said
Oct 30, 2011
Right there in 203-07, the note
sig226 said
Oct 30, 2011
Ok but truck weighted more than 10000. Doesn't it get supplement report?
sig226 said
Oct 30, 2011
QUALIFYING VEHICLE - for the purposes of this procedure is: a. Any commercial truck having a Gross Weight Rating or Gross Combined Weight Rating more than 10,000 pounds b. Any vehicle displaying a hazardous materials placard
E D said
Oct 30, 2011
If there is one cond of severity, the truck being towed, you Do a supp for every Qual vehicle. There were 2. The truck and suv with hazmat placard. U don't use ref marker for bridges and tunns. It should of been 2 supps no marker, but that wasn't a Choice.
NYG37 said
Oct 30, 2011
IInfinity is right.it sucks I got it wrong
OkeeDokee said
Oct 30, 2011
1. Didn't it say commercial rental? And, 2. Wasn't it a biohazard plaque?
wereinbacklog said
Oct 30, 2011
E D wrote:
If there is one cond of severity, the truck being towed, you Do a supp for every Qual vehicle. There were 2. The truck and suv with hazmat placard. U don't use ref marker for bridges and tunns. It should of been 2 supps no marker, but that wasn't a Choice.
Bingo, that's why I choice no supplement because since they didn't give me the correct supplement amount I figured that d vehicle wasn't towed and the person was treated at d scene. Either way a double answer or throwout.
MN50 said
Oct 30, 2011
It stated it was a rental truck, not a commercial so it didn't qualify. The suv was the only vehicle that qualified, only one supp prepared
I say 500. This is because many that are freaking out were probably looking between an 80 to 95 on a typical Lieutenant test. Now you will have between a 70 and 85. This test will
eliminate the test taker that wasnt completely dedicated.
Also the Truck & bus supplemental, I didn't even see the right answer as a choice and I know that procedure well
-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:08:15 PM
-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:13:24 PM
-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:15:44 PM
They asked which voucher was good for signing off
counterfeit voucher= bad counterfeit usc doesn't vouchered
firearm voucher= bad round from chamber was itemized 2nd
cellphone vouchered = bad it was vouchered as safekeeping should be arrest evidence
marihuana= good
The 204 question the answer was the tatoo guy that came out in 2010, he doesn't have to carry the letter on his person
Marijuana was missing the complaint number.
I didn't see what was wrong with the girl with the hair clip but the most correct to me was the the umos with the approval of the co and wasn't carrying the letter.
U do not need a letter if the reason is for a tatoo and approved by d co. The PG states it goes in ur personal folder and doesn't have to be carried.
the driver had injury but not removed from the scene
Where does it say that anywhere?It should be in personnel folder.
Also, the truck & bus question---the car had a biohard plaque.
How about the ammended PAR question? It says in the P.G. to refer them with leaving the scene cases, but it also says give them a MV104 if they don't qualify for MV104an
-- Edited by OkeeDokee on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:25:52 PM
-- Edited by OkeeDokee on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:27:28 PM
But the girls hair was ok too. That's why I say it's a double.
What about that retarded one with exploded dye pack...they wanted 2 procedures and none was indicated in answer choices
The question came down to two choices (Eliminate 2 since the reference marker will not be used accident occured on a bridge). Both stated one par, and not include d reference marker, but one said no supplement and the other stated one supplement. If in fact the supplement should be done then it should be two (placard, 22k lbs) instead of one.
-- Edited by wereinbacklog on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:26:07 PM
a. Any commercial truck having a Gross Weight Rating or Gross Combined Weight Rating more than 10,000 pounds
b. Any vehicle displaying a hazardous materials placard
It should of been 2 supps no marker, but that wasn't a
Choice.
2. Wasn't it a biohazard plaque?
Bingo, that's why I choice no supplement because since they didn't give me the correct supplement amount I figured that d vehicle wasn't towed and the person was treated at d scene. Either way a double answer or throwout.